[1. CONVENE]
[00:00:02]
>> JAMIE PLENKOVICH, DISTRICT.
>> MIKE KOZACK, BOND OVERSIGHT.
>> SANDY MCMILLIAN, BOND OVERSIGHT.
>> BRIAN LYNCH, BOND OVERSIGHT.
>> [INAUDIBLE], [LAUGHTER] BOND OVERSIGHT.
>> MARK HARTIN, BOND OVERSIGHT.
>> NEXT ITEM IS TO ADOPT THE AGENDA.
SO IF ANYBODY WANTS TO PUT MOTION FORWARD CAN DO THAT.
>> ANYBODY OPPOSED. AGENDA IS ADOPTED.
SAME PROTOCOL FOR THE MINUTES FROM LAST MONTH.
>> YEAH, I'D ADOPT THE MINUTES AS WRITTEN.
>> ANYBODY OPPOSED. AND MINUTES ARE ADOPTED.
PUBLIC COMMENT OR PUBLIC DISCUSSIONS OVER THE PAST MONTH.
[2. PUBLIC COMMENT]
>> WELL, I'LL GO. WENT TO THE ROCK THE NEST.
ROCK THE NEST, IS THAT WHAT IT WAS CALLED? THAT WAS PRETTY GOOD.
THAT WAS A GREAT USE OF THE FIELD I THOUGHT.
I THOUGHT THEY HAD A GOOD TURNOUT FOR IT BEEN RAINING IN THE MORNING AND SUN IN THE AFTERNOON.
THE ONE THING I DID NOTICE WAS AND MAYBE WE'RE WORKING ON IT, BUT THE SIGNS THAT SAY "STAY OUT OF THE AISLE" ARE JUST A PIECE OF PAPER STUCK IN A LAMINATED SLEEVE.
AND I NOTICED THAT WE HAD TO PUT THOSE UP LAST YEAR.
WHEN I WAS AT THE FOOTBALL GAME, I NOTICED THAT THEY HAD JUST PUT THOSE UP BECAUSE KIDS WERE STANDING IN THAT AISLE, WHERE THE HANDICAPPED SEATS ARE, AND THEN THE LOWER SEATING AND THEN THE UPPER SEATING AND THEY JUST DON'T LOOK THE QUALITY OF THE STADIUM.
SO I WAS HOPING WE COULD GET TO SOMETHING MADE AND MOUNTED THERE IF THAT'S WHAT WE'RE GOING TO DO.
>> ALONG THE SAME LINES AS THE STADIUM SIGNAGE, I WAS WONDERING IF WE COULD HAVE A SIGN THAT SAID, CONCESSIONS THAT HUNG FROM THE BLEACHERS THAT WAS AN ARROW THAT POINTED DOWN.
I WAS LIKE, WHY DON'T WE HAVE THE METAL SHOP PEOPLE MAKE THAT OR DO A LASER ENGRAVED THING.
BUT HE WAS LIKE, WELL, MAYBE YOU COULD FIND SOMETHING THAT COULD MATCH THE REST OF THE SIGNAGE IN THE FACILITY.
THAT'S FROM A SIGNAGE STANDPOINT AS WELL.
LIKE THE BATHROOMS. THE BATHROOMS HAVE A GREAT SIGNAGE.
SOMETHING THAT MAYBE MATCH THAT A LITTLE BIT.
AND I KNOW WE NEED THE SIGNS THERE TO KEEP THE KIDS FROM STANDING IN THE AISLE.
SO I'M NOT DISCOUNTING THE NECESSITY OF THOSE AT ALL.
JUST $3 MILLION STADIUM AND THESE PIECES OF PAPER STUCK IN A THING.
IT'D BE COOL IF THEY LOOK A LITTLE BETTER.
>> ANYBODY ELSE ON PUBLIC COMMENT OR CONVERSATIONS WITH THE PUBLIC? WE'LL MOVE ON TO PUBLIC COMMUNICATION.
[3. UNFINISHED BUSINESS]
I KNOW THERE'S THE OFFICIAL GRAND OPENING NEXT WEEK.I KNOW THE BOND UPDATE STUFF HAS COMMENCED OR WHAT'S THE OPPOSITE OF COMMENCED? CONCLUDED. THERE YOU GO.
SO I ASSUME THE GRAND OPENINGS, THE GRAND FINALE OF PUBLIC COMMUNICATION UNTIL THERE'S I GUESS SOME FINAL NUMBERS TO PRESENT IN A MORE FORMAL CAPACITY, WHICH I ASSUME WILL PROBABLY JUST BE A SCHOOL BOARD.
>> I THINK YOU'RE EXACTLY RIGHT. I THINK FROM HERE ON OUT, IT WILL PROBABLY BE MOSTLY JUST SCHOOL BOARD INFORMATION.
>> IS THERE ON THAT SAME NOTE THOUGH FOR THAT THING NEXT WEEK, I NOTICED OR IS IT NEXT WEEK, THE END OF THE WEEK? IS THERE LIKE AN AGENDA OR I GUESS I'M JUST CURIOUS AS TO WHAT THAT'S GOING TO LOOK LIKE?
[00:05:02]
I HAVE NOT SEEN IT AS OF YET.I KNOW THERE'S A PLAN FOR THE DIFFERENT, THERE'S I THINK THREE OR FOUR DIFFERENT SPEAKERS AND SOME DIFFERENT.
THE GROUPS OF FOLKS WILL BE, YOU'LL BE GROUPED TOGETHER AND RECOGNIZED FOR FOLKS THAT CONTRIBUTED TO THE PROJECT.
BUT OTHER THAN THAT, I'M NOT ENTIRELY SURE WHAT ALL THE DETAILS ARE.
>> I DON'T KNOW HOW MANY OF EVERYBODY IS GOING, SO I DON'T WANT TO PUT WORDS IN ANYBODY'S MOUTH, BUT IF THERE'S ANY EXPECTATIONS FOR THIS GROUP, JUST LET US KNOW IN ENOUGH TIME, NOT LIKE THE DAY BEFORE, LIKE A FEW DAYS BEFORE.
>> HAVE YOU ALL RECEIVED AN INVITATION? I WILL CONFIRM TOMORROW, BUT I BELIEVE THE EXPECTATION IS THAT JUST IF YOU'RE ABLE TO COME, THEN YOU'LL STAND AS A GROUP.
>> I DON'T THINK THERE'S AN EXPECTATION THAT ANYBODY IS GIVING A SPEECH.
>> ON THAT NOTE, THERE IS A WSA LUNCH IN THING ON THIS FRIDAY AND WE HAVE TWO SPOTS.
AND SO IF ANYBODY ELSE WANTS TO GO DOWN TO THAT, IF NOT, I'M OKAY.
DON'T KNOW IF I'M AVAILABLE. I DON'T KNOW.
IT DEPENDS ON IF I CAN ACTUALLY DO WHAT I'M HOPING I CAN DO THE NEXT TWO DAYS.
BUT IF ANYBODY HAS A DESIRE TO GO WITH SANDY, WE HAVE TWO SPOTS ASSIGNED FOR OUR GROUP FOR THAT.
>> THE WASHINGTON ASSOCIATION OF SCHOOL ADMINISTRATORS.
IT'S A RECOGNITION OF COMMUNITY CONTRIBUTIONS TO EVERYBODY'S [LAUGHTER] SCHOOL DISTRICT.
SO IT'S A WAY TO RECOGNIZE PEOPLE THAT HAVE MADE CONTRIBUTION TO THE LOCAL SCHOOLS.
>> I REMEMBER I THINK YOU AND WENDY WENT DOWN.
>> YEAH. AND THEY MAY BE COMPLETELY DIFFERENT UNRELATED ITEMS. PEOPLE RAISE MONEY FOR "DRIVE" FOR KID.
IT'S A VERY VARIED, WHATEVER THE CONTRIBUTION WAS OF THE FOLKS IN THAT DISTRICT.
AND YOU GET I THINK A CHICKEN PARMESAN AT THE [INAUDIBLE] COUNTRY CLUB.
>> SANDY'S GOING, AND IF NO ONE ELSE. [BACKGROUND] PERFECT.
>> IF ANYBODY ELSE WOULD LIKE TO GO.
>> WELL, I WILL GO IF I CAN. I DON'T KNOW IF I CAN YET.
>> I'M NOT GOING TO WATCH A BUNCH WITH ADMINISTRATORS. PAT OTHER ON THE BACK.
AND THEN WE ARE SUPPOSED TO RSVP FOR, WHAT DAY IS THE RIBBON CUTTING?
>> AND WE'RE SUPPOSED TO RSVP? I DIDN'T EVEN SEE THAT.
SALINA SENT AN EMAIL, BUT I DIDN'T SEE.
>> YES, SHE SENT AN EMAIL TO THE OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE BASICALLY SPECIFICALLY INVITING US.
BUT THERE WASN'T LIKE A FORMAL CLICK HERE TO RSVP THING.
>> THAT COULD BE A GOOD OPPORTUNITY FOR THE BOND OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE TO GIVE A PUBLIC BLESSING OF THE PROJECT AT THAT IF JOE OR RILEY DID SPEAK AT THAT.
[00:10:02]
I AM ACTUALLY BEING SERIOUS [LAUGHTER].>> [OVERLAPPING] IS THAT A DUMB IDEA?
>> I DON'T KNOW WHAT KIND OF WEBSITE I'D HAVE TO GO ON TO BE ORDAINED TO GIVE A PUBLIC BLESSING OVER THE SCHOOL [LAUGHTER].
>> THEN I THINK IT'S A GREAT IDEA FOR JOE TO DO THAT.
>> YOU SPOKE AT THE SHOVEL DIGGING?
>> I THINK THE COMMUNICATIONS TEAM PROBABLY GOT A SOLID HANDLE ON IT.
I THINK WE CAN DO A GREAT JOB OF DOING ONE OF THESE THINGS.
BRING SOME WATER TO SPRINKLE IN SCHOOL OR SOMETHING.
ANYTHING ELSE ON PUBLIC COMMENT, COMMUNICATION? FOLLOW UP STUFF FROM LAST MONTH.
THERE IS A VERY ROUGH DRAFT OF THE FINAL BOARD REPORT.
IT'S BASICALLY MARK AND SANDY'S CONTRIBUTIONS WITH A COUPLE OF THINGS THAT I WAS ABLE TO DO IN BETWEEN FATHERLY DUTIES?
>> YEAH, I THINK I HAVE SENTENCES.
>> WELL, YOU DIDN'T TAG YOUR SENTENCE WITH YOUR NAME.
>> I'M JUST GOING TO TAKE IT OUT AND YOU'LL HAVE IT.
>> SO WITH DO NOT EXTEND OUR DURATION OF OUR GROUP ANY LONGER THAN IT NEEDS TO BE.
I'D LIKE TO HAVE THE FINAL REPORT DONE BEFORE NEXT MONTH'S MEETING SO THAT WE CAN BASICALLY OFFICIALLY VOTE AND RUBBER STAMP IT AND GET IT TO THE SCHOOL BOARD BASICALLY THAT DAY, SO THEY HAVE A WEEK TO LOOK AT IT, WHICH I THINK MEANS PROBABLY SETTING UP A TIME FOR EITHER TO DO AN OFFICIAL STUDY SESSION IF IT'S GOING TO BE A LARGER GROUP OR TRY TO MEET IN A COUPLE OF SMALLER GROUPS TO FORMALIZE IT OVER THE NEXT MONTH VERSUS EVERYBODY TRYING TO JUMP INTO A SHARED DOCUMENT.
>> DO ALL THE INPUT, EVERYTHING, YOU WANT ONTO THE SHARED DOCUMENT, BUT I THINK TO ACTUALLY SIT DOWN AND LIKE, HEY, WHAT DO YOU THINK ABOUT? CAN WE TAKE THIS? CAN WE REWORD THIS RATHER THAN TRYING TO DECIPHER 77 COMMENTS AND IT'S ALONG A SHARED DOCUMENT.
I'M HAPPY TO COORDINATE THAT WITH WHOEVER.
>> SO IN A STUDY SESSION OR WHATEVER YOU WANT TO CALL, WE CAN HAVE EVERYBODY PRESENT OR WE HAVE TO STAY UNDER A QUORUM?
>> IF YOU ADVERTISE IT AS A MEETING, YOU CAN ALL BE THERE.
SO IF YOU'RE JUST GETTING TOGETHER TO WORK ON IT, THEN YOU HAVE TO BE UNDER A QUORUM.
>> SO IF WE GET TOGETHER TO WORK ON IT AS GROUPS OF THREE?
>> WHICH I THINK IS PROBABLY FINE.
WE CAN PROBABLY [OVERLAPPING].
>> BE MORE PRODUCTIVE IN GROUPS OF THREE TO START WITH ANYWAY.
>> WE'LL JUST PLAN ON TRYING TO COORDINATE IN THE NEXT COUPLE OF WEEKS.
>> WEEK AFTER MAY. SO WE HAVE TWO SECTIONS OF KEY FUNCTIONS OF THE BOC.
WHO WROTE THE FIRST ONE. WHO WROTE THE SECOND ONE? I COULDN'T QUITE FIGURE OUT.
THERE'S THE KEY FUNCTIONS OF THE BOC ON PAGE, WELL, IT SAYS 8 OF 12.
>> MARK WROTE THE ONE WITH NUMBERS AND BULLET POINTS.
>> SO THEN I WROTE THE SECOND ONE.
[00:15:02]
>> SO WE JUST NEED TO CONSOLIDATE THOSE.
>> WELL AND FIGURE OUT WHAT FORMAT WE WANT THIS TO BE.
>> WELL BECAUSE WHAT I WROTE, HE MAY HAVE TO CAPTURE.
LIKE I JUST WROTE A BASIC LETTERLESS PARAGRAPH.
>> WHERE I TRIED TO MAKE MORE OF A PRESENTATION BULLET POINT WAS MY ORIGINAL THINGS.
THAT'S THE WAY I WROTE IT AND SO I JUST PUT IT IN THERE AND WE CAN GO THROUGH AND PICK AND CHOOSE AND MERGE THINGS.
THAT'S WHY I'D BE GOOD TO HAVE AT LEAST IN-PERSON, WHAT FORMAT DO WE ACTUALLY WANT?
>> IT'S VERY LIKELY TO CAPTURE EVERYTHING THAT I'M DOING.
>> OR IF NOT, WE THROW YOURS IN OR WHATEVER FORMAT. THAT'S WHY.
>> I STARTED EDITING AND I WAS LIKE, OH, WAIT, WE HAVE TWO KEY FUNCTIONS OF THE BOC, AND I STOPPED.
>> BUT I DON'T KNOW HOW YOU WANT TO DO THAT.
WHO'S EVEN INTERESTED IN PARTICIPATING? [NOISE] I LIKE THREE OF US THE FIRST TIME AND THEN [OVERLAPPING].
>> MAYBE I MEET WITH MEET YOU TOO AND THEN MAYBE I MEET WITH BRIAN.
>> THE ONE THING YOU SEE ON THE PROJECT IS STILL PRETTY NEW, IS WE CAN PROBABLY JUST, IF YOU SEND US WHAT YOU PUT IN THE RFP AND WE HAVE THE [INAUDIBLE]
>> THE ONLY THING I WANT TO MAKE SURE IS NOTED IN THERE IS SOME INFORMATION ABOUT YOU KNOW, THE CRITICAL MAINTENANCE, THINGS THAT WE WERE PLANNING ON DOING, WHAT WE ACTUALLY DID, WHAT THINGS WE WERE ABLE TO DO LIKE THE DISTRICT HANDLING THE HOT WATER HEATERS VERSUS SUBBING THAT OUT.
I THINK THE PROPOSAL OR RFP SAYS DDC CONTROLS AT XYZ, AND WE DID THEM EVERYWHERE, AND THEN WE ADDED THE REMOTE FUNCTION AT VISTA, I BELIEVE, OR THE [OVERLAPPING] YEAH, FROM A STARTING POINT.
I ALSO WANT TO MAKE SURE IN THERE THE ALTERNATES THAT WERE TAKEN AT THE OX GYM AND ALL THE CTE STUFF AND THE ADDITIONAL WORK AT THE PACK AND THAT STUFF GETS.
BUT I THINK HAVING THE INITIAL WOULD BE GREAT [NOISE].
>> THEY NEVER DID, I THOUGHT ON THAT LAST SECOND WHEN THEY ACTUALLY DID ACCEPT OUR BY LAWS OR PROVE THAT WE COULD OPERATE UNDER THOSE BY LAWS.
[00:20:16]
>> WHEN I WAS GOING THROUGH THIS, AND I HAVE TO BE HONEST, I DIDN'T DO NEARLY AS MUCH AS I WAS INTENDING TO, BUT IS THERE COMPONENTS THAT PEOPLE WANT TO SPEARHEAD AS FAR AS TOPICS? I KNOW THE PROCESS REVIEW, IF YOU WILL, THAT SECTION DIDN'T REALLY GET TOUCHED ON THAT WOULD JUST BE THE REVIEW OF EARLY PLANNING, FINANCING, AND SOME OF IT MIGHT BE IN THIS CONCLUSIONS, RECOMMENDATIONS AREA.
SOME OF IT CAN BE MAYBE GLEANED OUT OF THERE, BUT JUST A REVIEW OF THAT.
I HAD PLANNING FINANCING DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION, A REVIEW OF THOSE PROCESSES.
IF YOU COULD START THE FINANCING SIDE, BECAUSE YOU HAVE A FAR GREATER GRASP ON ALL OF THE NUANCE WITHIN THAT THAN I DO.
>> THAT'S GOING TO GO UNDER WHAT SECTION?
>> AGAIN, THIS ISN'T LOCKED IN, BUT THE WAY I HAD IT SET UP WAS TO BACKGROUND, KEY FUNCTIONS, SCOPE REVIEW, AND THEN PROCESS REVIEW, SO THAT WOULD BE BASICALLY A NARRATIVE OF THE DIFFERENT PROCESSES.
THAT EARLY PLANNING STAGE AND HOW WE WERE INVOLVED, AND WHAT HAPPENED AND WHAT WENT WELL, WHAT DIDN'T GO WELL, AND WHERE THAT LED TO OR WHATEVER.
>> I THINK SO. I MEAN, I GIVE IT FROM MY PERSPECTIVE, PROBABLY THE MORE DETAIL AT THIS POINT, THE BETTER, AND THEN WHEN WE SIT DOWN, WE CAN BE LIKE, WE DON'T NEED THREE PAGES ON HOW WE WENT FROM A TO Z OR WHATEVER.
BUT THAT WOULD BE THE PLANNING SIDE, AND THEN THE FINANCING SIDE WOULD BE TALKING ABOUT WHEN WE CHOSE TO RUN OR WHEN THE DISTRICT CHOSE TO RUN THE BOND SALES AND YOU KNOW, WE WENT THROUGH THE WHOLE PROCESS OF HAVING TO TRYING TO GIVE A SECOND OPINION AND THE SECOND SALE AND THE THIRD SALE, AND THAT PROCESS.
>> OBVIOUSLY, THE DESIGN PART ON DIEKMANNS ON BOARD, WANTS, I GUESS, THE PLANNING AND THE DESIGN INTERMINGLE A LITTLE BIT, BECAUSE AT SOME POINT, DIEKMANN GOT INVOLVED, AND THEN THEY WENT THROUGH THE PROCESS OF THE DIFFERENT, WHAT ARE THEY CALL IT THE DAC OR SOMETHING, WHERE THEY HAD THE THREE LOCATIONS OF THE SCHOOL, AND WALKED THROUGH THAT PROCESS.
THEN OBVIOUSLY THERE WAS THE BUDGET OPTION PROCESS, AND THEN THERE WAS THE DESIGN DEVELOPMENT OR SCHEMATIC DESIGN DEVELOPMENT, VALUE ENGINEERING, AND THAT PROCESS UNTIL YOU GET TO THE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS, AND BASICALLY, THAT DESIGN PROCESS WOULD TAKE YOU UP THROUGH.
>> YOU'D HAVE ORIGINAL BOND SCOPE, WHICH WAS WHAT CAME OUT OF THE MEETING WITH, WHAT'S THAT? [BACKGROUND] YES, THANK YOU.
THEN YOU HAD THE ORIGINAL DESIGN DOCUMENT SCOPE.
IS THAT WHAT WE'RE GOING TO CALL IT? THEN YOU HAVE THE FINAL SCOPE.
[OVERLAPPING] I'M MAKING NOTES UNDER THE SCOPE PROJECT/SCOPE VIEW.
>> THE SCOPE REVIEW WOULD BASICALLY BE LIKE FACTUAL.
THE WAY I'M SEEING IT, IT CAN NOT BE THIS WAY.
I DON'T CARE NECESSARILY, BUT THE WAY I SEE IT IS,
[00:25:01]
THE SCOPE REVIEW IS LIKE, THIS IS WHAT WE SAID WE WERE GOING TO DO, THIS IS WHAT WE DID, AND WHERE THINGS DIFFERED, LIKE HEY, WE WERE ABLE TO DO THIS AND THIS AND THIS ON TOP OF ALL THE THINGS WE SAID WE'RE GOING TO DO.HERE'S THE SCOPE REVIEW, SAFETY SECURITY UPDATES AT EVERY SCHOOL.
THEN PROBABLY LIST ALL THE SCHOOLS, AND WE DID FENCING IN THIS, AND FENCING AND SECURE ACCESS, AND JUST A LIST OF THE ACTUAL WORK, AND THEN THE HIGH SCHOOL WOULD BE REPLACED, WHATEVER THE LANGUAGE IS IN THE PROPOSAL, AND THEN, BASICALLY A BALL OF POINT OF THIS MUCH SQUARE FOOT OF THIS MUCH SQUARE FOOT OF CLASSROOM COMMONS, ATHLETIC CTE.
WE'RE ABLE TO ADD AN AUXILIARY DURING X, Y, Z ALTERNATE.
>> ORIGINAL BOND TASKFORCE ORIGINAL BASE SCOPE, AND THEN FINAL SCOPE WITH ALTERNATES?
>> YEAH, FOR ALL THREE OF THOSE SECTIONS.
>> I THINK THIS, SORRY, SANDY. GO AHEAD.
>> THE SCHEDULE THING OR THE ONE THAT HAD THE SCHEDULE, THAT ONE? [BACKGROUND] YEAH. [BACKGROUND] NO.
>> NO, I WAS ACTUALLY GOING TO SAY THAT SANDY'S POINT EARLIER, THE BOND PROPOSITION IS REALLY THE ACTUAL.
THAT'S THE STUFF WE HAVE TO DO THAT WE SAID WE WERE GOING TO DO.
I THINK USING THAT AS A SOURCE DOCUMENT IS IMPORTANT.
LINED WITH WHAT CAME OUT OF THE TASK FORCE.
YOU CAN CONNECT THOSE TWO DOTS PRETTY EASY, BUT THE RESOLUTION WAS THE CRITICAL PIECE.
>> I MEAN, THIS MAY BE A DUMB QUESTION, BUT WHERE IS THAT? IS THAT ON THE WEBSITE? THE BOND RESOLUTION.
>> IT SHOULD BE ON THE COUNTY WEBSITE AND I KNOW IT'S ON BOARDDOCS BECAUSE THE BOARD HAD TO APPROVE IT.
>> IT MIGHT BE IN THE SHAREPOINT.
>> I'LL AT LEAST GET A START IN ON THAT. THE SCOPE.
>> I THINK YOUR FINANCIAL ONE, YOU'VE ALREADY GOT THE SECOND HALF.
YOU'RE JUST MISSING THE BEGINNING OF IT BECAUSE THIS IS A REALLY GOOD CONCLUSION TO IT.
YOU JUST NEED TO ADD IN THE BEGINNING OF THE PROCESS.
>> I'M SORRY, ONE MORE NEW QUESTION.
THE OVERALL PROCESS REVIEW THAT'S WHERE THE FINANCIAL.
>> I BROKE IT INTO PLANNING, FINANCING, DESIGN, AND CONSTRUCTION.
THOSE THINGS ALL ARE TAILORED AROUND THE HIGH SCHOOL PROJECT, NOT NECESSARILY IN THE MAINTENANCE.
WE COULD TECHNICALLY HAVE ANOTHER LINE ITEM THAT WAS JUST MAINTENANCE AND SECURITY AND YOU COULD DO A LITTLE REVIEW OF THOSE THAT WORK.
IN THE END, IT WAS LESS THAN 10% OF THE OVERALL BOND.
BUT NONETHELESS, IT WAS NECESSARY AND A SUCCESS AND PART OF THE WORK.
>> WELL, I THINK WE STILL NEED TO COME AT IT TOO FROM OUR INVOLVEMENT IN THE PROCESS OF IT.
[00:30:03]
WE'VE STATED WHO WE ARE AND WE'VE STATED WHAT WE'RE SUPPOSED TO DO, AND WE'VE STATED WHAT THE SCOPE IS.THEN THAT'S REALLY HOW WE OPERATED WITHIN THE STRUCTURE OF WHAT HAPPENED, PROS, CONS, WHATEVER.
THEN THE LAST PART WOULD BE DO THIS AGAIN, THESE WERE GOOD THINGS.
DON'T DO THIS AGAIN OR AVOID DOING THESE THINGS AND WE SHOULD HAVE DONE THIS [BACKGROUND].
I THINK THE TOP SECTION IS REALLY JUST DATA AND THEN THAT PROCESS REVIEW IS REALLY THE REPORT, IF YOU WILL FOR OUR INVOLVEMENT IN THE PROCESS.
THAT'S PROBABLY WHERE THAT AND THE RECOMMENDATION SIDE WOULD PROBABLY BE THE PLACE TO SPEND THE MOST TIME MAKING SURE WE GOT THE RIGHT INFORMATION AND WE'RE SAYING IT THE RIGHT WAY.
>> I UPDATED THE LIVE DOCUMENT.
SANDY'S HANDLING THE FINANCING.
OUT OF THE OVERALL PROCESS REVIEW, WE STILL HAVE PLANNING, DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION, AND THEN MAINTENANCE AND SECURITY.
>> I'M HAPPY TO, WE CAN ALL JUMP IN THERE.
>> GET IN THERE WE CAN ADD SOME STUFF OVER THE NEXT COUPLE OF WEEKS.
>> I DON'T WANT TO PUSH INTO JULY.
>> OUR MEETING IS ON THE 18TH AND THE BOARD MEETING WOULD BE ON THE 25TH NEXT MONTH.
IT'S IN FOUR WEEKS IT'S OUR MEETING.
WE SHOULD PROBABLY PLAN ON MEETING AT LEAST AT THE LATEST PROBABLY THE 11TH A WEEK BEFORE OUR MEETING, TO MEET AND I CAN SEND AN EMAIL OUT TOO.
SOMEWHERE, IT DOESN'T HAVE TO BE THE 11TH, SOMEWHERE IN THAT AREA.
BUT IN THE MEANTIME, OBVIOUSLY, TRY TO GET IN AND ADD AS MUCH AS WE CAN SO WE'RE NOT HAVING TO SIT DOWN FOR TWO HOURS TO NOT GET A TON OF MOVEMENT.
>> I'LL SEND A TEXT OUT OR SOMETHING.
[BACKGROUND] WE HAVE MORE WORK TO DO THAN WHAT WE'RE THINKING OF. [INAUDIBLE].
>> HAVE A FINALIZED COPY TO GIVE IT TO TAMMY TO INCLUDE IN OUR PACKET.
WE PROBABLY NEED A FINALIZED COPY BY THE END OF THAT WEEK, THE 14TH, SO THAT TAMMY CAN GET THEM.
[BACKGROUND] I THINK STEVE HAD MEANT.
[00:35:02]
THE WAY I LOOK AT IT IS IN THE REPORT, BECAUSE IT GOES INTO THE RECORD, PROBABLY MORE THE BETTER.THE REALITY IS, IS THE BOARD GOING TO READ EVERY WORD OF IT? NO?
>> PARTICULARLY SINCE IT'S THE FINAL REPORT, I THINK INCLUDING A LOT OF INFORMATION.
HAVING A LONG REPORT THAT REFLECTS THE WORK THAT WENT INTO IT ISN'T NECESSARILY A BAD THING.
YOU DON'T NEED TO RECITE EVERY WORD AT THE [LAUGHTER] PRESENTATION.
BUT I THINK HAVING THE REPORT AS DETAILED AS YOU WANT TO MAKE IT IS GREAT.
SOMEBODY 10 YEARS FROM NOW READ THIS, THEY THINK, WOW, THEY WILL CAPTURE THE FULL FLAVOR OF IT OR NOT.
>> MY THOUGHT WOULD BE IF AND WHEN THE NEXT BOG PASSES AND I ASSUME THEY'LL TRY TO HAVE ANOTHER GROUP LIKE THIS AND WE MAY OR MAY NOT BE AROUND TO HELP IN ANY CAPACITY, MAYBE THEY COULD ACCESS IT AND READ IT AND START OFF IN A BETTER SPOT.
>> IT'LL BE SOMETHING FOR YOU TO SHARE AT THE PRESENTATION NEXT YEAR IN SPOKANE TOO.
>> WELL, LET'S TRY TO GET US THREE AND TRY TO GET TOGETHER IN THE NEXT COUPLE OF WEEKS.
>> [BACKGROUND] YOU GUYS SIGNED OFF ON THAT.
>> [BACKGROUND] IT WASN'T AT A MEETING.
I'M GOING TO BE WATCHING TENNIS. [LAUGHTER]
>> WE'LL FIGURE OUT TIME TO GET TOGETHER IN THE NEXT COUPLE OF WEEKS.
>> I WILL TEXT YOU, NOT EMAIL YOU.
>> OTHERWISE I WON'T GET RESPONSE UNTIL A WEEK BEFORE MEETING.
>> I'LL GET MY PART DONE BEFORE JUNE 1.
>> CAN I RECOMMEND MAY 27? SAY YES.
>> ANYTHING ELSE ON THE FINAL REPORT WE PLAN ON.
I'LL COORDINATE VIA EMAIL WITH TWO AT A TIME.
MOVING ON. I DID SEND AN EMAIL TO DR. ERICSON.
I DIDN'T GET A RESPONSE, I DON'T THINK.
I DON'T HAVE A RESPONSE ABOUT BASICALLY JUST LETTING THEM KNOW TO INVITE OR IF THERE'S A PROCESS ASKED TO BE FORMERLY GONE ABOUT IF OTHER FORMER BOARD MEMBERS WANTED TO PARTICIPATE IN A Q&A SINCE THEY'RE TECHNICALLY MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC NOW.
I DON'T KNOW IF I'M PRIVILEGED ENOUGH TO HAVE HIS PERSONAL.
>> THEY HAVE PHONE NUMBERS PUBLISHED ON THEIR WEBSITE TOO.
IT MAY HAVE BEEN A LOT OF TIMES THOSE THINGS WILL GET FORWARDED TO SUPERINTENDENT TO FOLLOW THROUGH ON.
>> I KNOW AFTER THE LAST MEETING WE HAD MENTIONED THAT THAT CAME UP AS AN IDEA AND IT WAS RECEIVED FAVORABLY.
[00:40:02]
>> I WILL TRY ALTERNATIVE MODES OF COMMUNICATION.
I'LL LEAVE IT IN THERE FOR IT TO SORT OUT.
ANYTHING ELSE ON THE FINAL REPORT IN GENERAL? WE'LL MOVE ON AND SEE IF WE CAN GET AN UPDATE ON WHERE WE'RE AT WITH GETTING THE FINAL CHANGE ORDER SORTED OUT.
WE'VE HAD A LITTLE BIT OF CORRESPONDENCE BACK AND FORTH WITH CORNERSTONE.
THE LAST VERSION THAT CAME THROUGH, I NEEDED TO GET A LITTLE CLARIFICATION FROM THEM, SO I SENT A RESPONSE TO SAM AND ASKED FOR CLARIFICATION ON A COUPLE OF THE ITEMS AND I'M WAITING TO HEAR BACK.
I'M HOPING TO GET THIS WRAPPED UP HERE FAIRLY SHORTLY, BUT I THINK THEY'RE PRETTY BUSY RIGHT NOW WITH SOME OTHER THINGS, I'M GUESSING SINCE IT'S THE TIME OF YEAR.
BUT AS SOON AS WE HEAR BACK FROM HIM, WE WILL BE ABLE TO GET BACK TO THEM VERY QUICKLY WITH THE NEXT PROPOSAL AND HOPEFULLY WE'LL HAVE IT SORTED OUT HERE PRETTY QUICK.
I GOT NOTHING OTHER THAN I'M WAITING FOR SOME INFORMATION.
BUT I THINK IT'S GOING TO SORT OUT FAVORABLY.
AS SOON AS WE GET SOME ACTUAL NEXT GO ROUND OF INFORMATION, WE CAN HAVE A SUBCOMMITTEE MEETING AND GO THROUGH THAT.
WELL, THERE AREN'T LITIGATION ITEMS. WE'RE WORKING ON A FINAL COMPREHENSIVE CHANGE ORDER TO WRAP UP ALL.
>> THAT'S YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT YOU'RE WAITING FOR THAT INCLUDES ALL OF EVERYTHING.
>> THERE'S SOME REFERENCE TO A COUPLE OF OTHER CHANGE ORDERS THAT WOULD BE OUTSIDE OF THAT, THAT I NEED CLARIFICATION AS TO WHAT THOSE ARE IN THEIR MIND SO THAT'S WHAT WE'RE WAITING FOR JUST SO WE CAN VERIFY THAT WE'RE OPERATING UNDER THE SAME ASSUMPTION, SAME BASE OF NUMBERS SO WE CAN RECONCILE.
AS SOON AS I GET THAT INFORMATION BACK FROM SAM, THEN WE'LL BE OFF TO THE RACES FOR IT.
HOLDING RETAINAGE. DO YOU HAVE ANY INCENTIVE TO FINALIZE THIS, I GUESS? WE'VE GOT A PAY APP THAT'S PENDING AS WELL.
>> THE END RESULT IN THE DISPUTED EXPENSES WAS SATISFACTORY TO THE SCHOOL DISTRICT?
>> THAT'S WHAT WE'RE WORKING ON.
>> SO ALL OF THAT IS STILL UP IN THE AIR?
>> YEAH. IT'S ALL BEEN ROLLED INTO ONE.
>> NONE OF THAT HAS ACTUALLY BEEN NEGOTIATED TO THE POINT OF AGREEMENT?
>> SO THAT YOU HAVE NO IDEA WHERE THAT LANDS OR WHERE FINANCIALLY IT'S AT NOW?
>> THAT'S NOT ENTIRELY ACCURATE.
>> I DIDN'T THINK IT WAS, BUT I WAS TRYING TO STIMULATE YOU TO RESPOND.
IT WILL BE LESS THAN WHAT WAS ON THE LAST QUESTION FINANCIAL.
THE ITEMS THAT ARE UP IN THE AIR WILL BE LESS THAN THAT, BUT I CAN'T, AT THIS POINT, TELL YOU HOW MUCH LESS.
>> YOU MAY HAVE TO START PUTTING A RESPONSE BY DATES ON THINGS.
IT'S NOT UNCOMMON FOR IT TO GET JUST KICKED TO THE SIDE.
IF THEY HAVE THREE PROPOSALS TRYING TO GO OUT THE DOOR, YOUR LAST IN LINE.
YOU WANT TO GET FINALIZED BECAUSE THE LONGER YOU'RE HOLDING THEIR MONEY AND THIS DRAGS OUT, THE MORE PEOPLE FORGET THINGS, SO YOU WANT TO BE KEEPING THINGS MOVING ALONG AND BE DONE.
IT'S ULTIMATELY IN YOUR BEST INTEREST.
>> I'M ALSO CURIOUS HOW MANY OF THOSE LARGE OUTSTANDING ITEMS ARE SUB ITEMS.
>> A MILLION BUCKS IS ON 112, 113.
[00:45:04]
REALLY, NOT THAT MUCH.>> WELL, ESPECIALLY IF THEY'RE ALL SUB-CHANGE ORDERS THAT JUST PASS THROUGH.
THEY'RE NOT OUT THE MILLION BUCKS, THEY'RE ONLY OUT.
>> MAYBE A FEW HUNDRED THOUSAND.
>> YEAH. WELL, WHATEVER IT IS.
>> BUT TO HIS POINT, IT WASN'T SELF PERFORMANCE.
A MILLION DOLLAR OF SELF PERFORMANCE IS SUBSTANTIALLY DIFFERENT THAN A MILLION DOLLARS OF A BUNCH OF SUBCONTRACTED STUFF, SO THEIR INCENTIVE IS LOW.
>> I DON'T THINK THEY WANT TO DRAG IT OUT TOO MUCH FURTHER EITHER.
MY EXPERIENCE WITH CORNERSTONE HERE AND ON OTHER PROJECTS INDIRECTLY, THEY DON'T SEEM TO LINGER AS MUCH AS OTHER CONTRACTORS THAT I'VE WORKED WITH.
LIKE HE SAID, IT'S JUST A MATTER OF THEY WANT X AND YOU OFFERED 1/2 OF X AND THEY WANT 3/4 OF X AND YOU'RE OFFERING 60% OF X AND YOU DO THE DANCE, THE THING.
JUST GETTING THEM TO RESPOND, WHICH USUALLY TAKES SAM TALKING TO SOMEBODY HIGHER THAT, ARE YOU OKAY WITH 80%? ARE YOU OKAY WITH 70%? WHATEVER.
>> OWNERS OF THESE LITTLE SUBS GET TOGETHER [INAUDIBLE]
>> ACTUALLY, I MIGHT YEAH. BEING THAT YOU DON'T KNOW THE NUMBER, YOU MIGHT NOT HAVE AN ANSWER FOR THIS EITHER, BUT I'M GOING TO ASK ANYWAY.
THE LAST ITERATION WHEN WE WENT DOWN THROUGH THE WHOLE BUDGET THING, THE BALANCE WAS LIKE AT 550.
MY ASSUMPTION IS THAT THAT 550 IS LARGER NOW.
THERE'S MORE OF A BALANCE BECAUSE THAT WAS INCLUDING EVERYTHING.
I DON'T THINK IT'S ACTUALLY LARGER NOW, BUT I THINK WE ANTICIPATE IT BEING LARGER WHEN WE'RE WRAPPED.
IS THAT 548 STILL ACCURATE OR HAS THE PACK WORK?
>> THERE ISN'T ANYTHING FURTHER.
>> THEORETICALLY, EVERYTHING IS DONE.
>> DOES ANYBODY ELSE HAVE ANY OTHER QUESTIONS JUST REVOLVING AROUND FINAL FINANCIAL TO CLOSE OUT? I GUESS MY ONE REQUEST WOULD BE IF THAT DOES HAPPEN PRIOR TO OUR NEXT MEETING, UNLESS IT'S A FRIDAY BEFORE OR SOMETHING, THEN THERE'S NO NEED TO HAVE A SPECIAL MEETING ON A MONDAY BEFORE WE MEET ON A TUESDAY, BUT IF SOMETHING HAPPENS, IT'D BE BENEFICIAL TO MAYBE DO A QUICK WALK THROUGH HOW THAT ALL SHOOK OUT.
>> MOVE ON. GET ONE LAST UPDATE FROM KEN.
[4.NEW BUSINESS]
[00:51:55]
>> WAIT, WHO WENT TO ACE HARDWARE AND GOT SOME EXTENSION CHANGED? THEY DID? I THOUGHT YOU WERE TALKING ABOUT THE THEATER FOLKS.
[00:55:08]
>> I ALSO APPRECIATED THE FACT THAT YOU GUYS REPLACED THE LIGHTS, THE WORK LIGHTS ON THE STAGE.
IT SOUNDS LIKE YOU DID THAT INTERNALLY? THAT WAS AWESOME.
>> WELL, THEY'RE STILL ON ALL THE TIME.
>> I THOUGHT THAT WAS SUPPOSED TO BE FIXED A COUPLE OF MONTHS AGO.
>> I THINK, THE TERM OVERRIDE SUPPOSED TO BE SELF EXPLANATORY.
YOU TALKED ABOUT TRAINING A LITTLE BIT, AND I GUESS IT'S JUST A GENERAL STATEMENT, ESPECIALLY IT MAKES ME THINK ABOUT THE CURTAINS.
ARE THE RIGHT PEOPLE BEING TRAINED AND ARE THEY BEING TRAINED TO THE LEVEL THAT THEY'RE GOING TO BE ABLE TO TRAIN THE KIDS? BECAUSE PERSON IS NOT GOING TO COME BACK EVERY TIME.
[01:00:04]
SOMEBODY IS GOING TO LET KIDS AT SOME POINT MANAGE SOME OF THE LIGHTING, THE SOUND, THE CURTAINS, THINGS LIKE THAT.ARE THOSE PEOPLE BEING TRAINED TO THE LEVEL THAT THEY CAN NOW TRAIN SOMEONE ELSE? [INAUDIBLE]
>> YEAH. AND IT'S NO CRITICISM IS JUST A QUESTION BECAUSE I KNOW THAT THAT COULD BE [INAUDIBLE]
>> THAT'S COMMON WITH A LOT OF STUFF, LIKE HOW WE HAD A PROBLEM WITH ONE OF THE FIRE CURTAINS, AND THERE WAS TRAINING, BUT THAT WAS SIX MONTHS AGO.
SO EXACTLY UNTIL YOU GO UP AND YOU KIND OF FUMBLE THROUGH IT, AND THE RIGHT PEOPLE WERE THERE, BUT IT'S STILL DEPENDING ON THE GAP BETWEEN WHEN YOU DID SOMETHING AND IT COULD HAVE BEEN A DAY THAT WE HAD, THREE DIFFERENT THINGS GOING ON AT THE SAME TIME.
HOW MUCH ARE YOU TAKING IN? THIS MAINTENANCE GUY WAS THERE, BUT HE MAY BE GONE THE NEXT TIME THAT SOMETHING HAPPENED.
SO WE'RE STILL GOING TO FUMBLE THROUGH SOME STUFF TILL WE GET USED TO DOING THAT A FEW TIMES.
WE HAVE THE RESOURCES, DOESN'T MEAN THAT IT'S GOING TO BE PERFECT.
>> NO. IT WON'T EVER BECAUSE PEOPLE WILL LEAVE AND NEW PEOPLE WILL COME AND THEY DIDN'T GET TRAINED.
>> I WENT THROUGH THE FIRE CURTAIN TRAINING ON THE RESET, AND IT'S LIKE GET BACK IN THERE.
IT'S LIKE, WHAT DID WE DO? WENT THROUGH THIS WITH KURT.
HOW DID WE DO THIS AGAIN? I'M SURE THE PACK WILL BE THE SAME WAY.
>> THE PROBLEM IS SOMETIMES [INAUDIBLE]
>> I GUESS IT'S GOOD THAT YOU GO THROUGH THAT AND A LOT OF TIMES LIKE ON BIG TREATMENT FACILITIES, WE'RE VIDEOING ALL THE TRAININGS NOW BECAUSE WHETHER WE SHOULD OR NOT, WE NEED TO BECAUSE THAT GUY'S GOING TO LEAVE AND HE'S GOING TO HAVE A NEW GUY.
SO THAT SAME TYPE OF THING IS CONTINUALLY GOING TO HAPPEN.
>> I NOTICED THAT THE SIGN BOARD WAS NOT WORKING FOR A COUPLE OF DAYS.
>> WE HAD A POWER ISSUE ON A FRIDAY.
WE LOST IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD A LEG THAT AFFECTED THE SIGN.
WE HAD TO CYCLE IT, AND THEN IT WAS BACK WORKING.
>> SO IT WAS A FLUKEY THING THEN?
>> IT WAS A FLUKEY THING, YEAH.
>> I WAS WONDERING IF THERE'S ANY CHANCE THAT THE CIVIL CONTRACTOR DAMAGED THE FEEDER LINES TO THE TENNIS COURT LIGHTS WHEN THEY WERE DIGGING ALONG THE TENNIS COURT BECAUSE THAT'S ABOUT THE TIME THEY STOPPED WORKING.
>> I THINK IT WAS BEFORE THAT ACTUALLY.
I THINK WE HAD AN EMAIL BEFORE THAT THAT THERE WAS SOME ISSUES.
[01:05:01]
IT'S BEEN HIT AND MISS.WE'VE TRIED TO FIGURE OUT WHAT'S GOING ON THERE, BUT THEN IT WORKED FOR A WHILE.
>> YEAH. THEY DON'T WORK ANYMORE. I'M ASSUMING YOU JUST TURNED THE POWER OFF TOO OUT THERE.
>> I'LL HAVE TO CHECK WITH RON.
WE'VE BEEN OUT THERE A FEW TIMES TO TRY TO FIGURE OUT WHAT'S GOING ON, AND FOR A WHILE IT WAS BACK WORKING.
>> WHO IS RESPONSIBLE FOR MOWING?
>> WE'RE STILL IN A TWO YEAR CONTRACT WITH THE LANDSCAPING CONTRACTOR.
THEY HAVE PROPOSED A DISCOUNT TO THEIR CONTRACT IF WE TAKE IT OVER SOONER, BUT WE'RE STILL EVALUATING THAT AND YES, IT HAS NOT BEEN GREAT.
>> I CAN'T TELL IF SOME OF THE GRASS IS INTENTIONALLY A FOOT LONG, IF IT'S THAT TYPE OF GRASS?
>> NO. MOST OF THOSE SPOTS SHOULD BE GETTING MOWED.
>> CAN'T TELL WHICH PART'S THE HAY FIELD AND WHICH PART
>> BECAUSE YOU DO HAVE A LOT MORE LAWN NOW.
>> YES. AND TO BE HONEST, WE HAVEN'T ACTUALLY TALKED ABOUT THIS IN DEPTH.
WHEN I SAW WHAT HE WAS PROPOSING FOR THE AMOUNT TO GIVE BACK TO US, I WAS LIKE, NO, YOU CAN KEEP DOING IT AS MY FIRST THOUGHT.
FOR THAT PRICE, YOU MIGHT AS WELL KEEP DOING IT FOR THE TWO YEARS.
WE'RE GOING TO SPEND MORE THAN THAT IN LABOR.
>> BECAUSE THEY'RE GOING TO EDGE IT TOO, WHEN THEY MOW IT? THEY'RE NOT JUST GOING TO MOW IT.
>> WELL, WE HAVE TO TALK TO THEM BECAUSE SO FAR IT HASN'T BEEN THE STANDARD I WOULD LIKE TO SEE.
I DON'T KNOW HOW MOTIVATED THEY ARE ON THAT ASPECT.
IT'S CONFUSING BECAUSE THEY HAVE A TWO YEAR CONTRACT, BUT WE ALSO TALKED ON THE PRACTICE FIELD, HOW LONG AND HE'S SAYING 90 DAYS AFTER ESTABLISHMENT.
WELL, WE'VE GOT A WHOLE BUNCH OF DIFFERENT AREAS AND DIFFERENT PHASES OF ESTABLISHMENT. WHAT DOES THAT MEAN? ARE WE TAKING OVER ALL THE MOWING AND YOU GUYS ARE STILL DOING THE PARTS THAT AREN'T.
THERE'S SOME THINGS WE GOT TO WORK OUT.
>> IT DOESN'T LOOK LIKE IT'S BEEN FERTILIZED OUT THERE. YOU WOULD KNOW BETTER THAN ME.
>> THEY WERE SUPPOSED TO HAVE FERTILIZED IT A FEW WEEKS AGO, AND I DON'T KNOW IF THEY ACTUALLY GOT OUT THERE.
IT DOES NOT LOOK LIKE IT'S, YEAH.
IT'S PRETTY YELLOWISH AT THIS POINT.
AND HE MAY HAVE WAITED TILL TRACK WAS DONE TO WANT TO DO THAT.
>> WHY DIDN'T THEY HYDROSEED ALONG THE PARK? WHY DID THEY JUST BROADCAST SPREAD? DID WE SAVE SOME MONEY BY THEM NOT HAVING A HYDROSEEDING OR?
>> I'M NOT TOTALLY SURE THEY DIDN'T SPRAY SOMETHING.
>> I WAS HOPING IT WAS GOING TO LOOK AWESOME FOR THE RIBBON CUTTING.
I GUESS THAT'S WHY I BROUGHT THAT UP.
>> WE WILL HAVE THE CONVERSATION WITH THEM, WHAT'S HAPPENING ON THE 30TH.
IT MIGHT BE IN THEIR BEST INTEREST TO MAKE IT LOOK GOOD.
BUT HE'S ALSO SAID ORIGINALLY THAT THEY'RE NOT SET UP AS A COMMERCIAL LAWN CARE BUSINESS.
>> WELL, THEY COULD SUBCONTRACT WINDWOOD.
>> IS THIS YOUR LANDSCAPING CONTRACTOR?
>> THE CONTRACTS LANDSCAPING CONTRACTOR?
>> THE CONTRACT IS WITH THE LANDSCAPING CONTRACTOR.
>> NO. THAT'S BEEN PROVEN SO FAR.
THEY'RE OUT WITH THIS LITTLE TINY PUSH MOWER, ONE PERSON.
THEY COULD DEFINITELY USE AN UPGRADE IN EQUIPMENT.
>> THE ONLY OTHER THING AS I WAS STANDING OUT WITH ONE OF THE FACULTY MEMBERS ON THE TRACK, AND IT LOOKED LIKE SOME OF THE SPOTS ARE POTENTIALLY BUBBLING ON THE TRACK.
SPECIFICALLY NEAR THE END ZONE ON THE GRANDSTAND SIDE.
HE WAS WALKING AND IT LOOKED LIKE IT WAS DEPRESSING AND THEN IT WOULD COME BACK UP.
I DON'T KNOW IF THAT'S SUPPOSED TO BE DOING THAT OR NOT.
IF YOU HAD A REALLY LOW ANGLE AT, YOU CAN SEE APPARENTLY A FEW SPOTS COMING UP,
[01:10:03]
SO I THOUGHT IT WAS WORTH MENTIONING.IT'S JUST IN THE BACK OF THE END ZONE, BASICALLY, NEAR THE FIRST LANE OF THE TRACK, THE FIRST INSIDE LANE OF THE TRACK ON THE SOUTHWEST CORNER.
>> THAT'S ACTUALLY FIRST I HEARD OF THAT. SHARE THAT.
>> IT WAS MARK, AND HE JUST SAW IT, SO YOU MIGHT ASK SINCE THEY'RE OUT THERE ALL THE TIME THEY NOTICE THAT.
I THOUGHT THAT WAS WORTH MENTIONING.
>> I'M JUST CURIOUS ON HOW THE PUNCH LIST IS GOING IN THE BUILDING.
IT'S THE MAIN BUILDING ITSELF.
IT SOUNDS LIKE IT'S PRETTY GOOD.
IT SOUNDS LIKE A LOT OF COMPLETED ITEMS.
>> WHEN'S THE WARRANTY START DATE? IT'LL BE A GOOD NEGOTIATING TOOL WITH YOUR FINAL CHANGE OVER?
>> YEAH. IF THAT'S NOT CLEAR IN THE CONTRACT, THAT'D BE A EXCELLENT NEGOTIATING TOOL.
>> I THINK THE CONTRACT WILL PROBABLY SAY WHEN YOU GET FINAL OCCUPANCY.
>> IF IT'S CLEAR, YOU DON'T GET FINAL TILL IT'S WORK IS DONE.
>> OR YOU CAN SAY IT STARTS WHEN WE GET FINAL RESOLUTION ON FINANCES.
AT LEAST WE GOT A FREE YEAR WORTH OF WARRANTY IN THE BILL.
>> EXACTLY. AND THEY DON'T WANT THAT. I KNOW THAT.
>> I DO THINK THE PLACE LOOKS AMAZING.
>> IT FEELS RIDICULOUS. IT'S AMAZING.
>> ARE THEY RUNNING THEIR BOND IN AUGUST?
>> THEY ARE GOING TO RUN IT AGAIN.
GOOD LUCK TO THEM, THEY OWN FOUR RIGHT NOW, SO.
>> DON'T THINK THAT EVERY SINGLE GAME WE HAVE HERE, AND IT'S AGAINST LINDA, THEY'RE NOT LOOKING AT IT VERY, VERY JEALOUS.
EVERY SINGLE GAME, EVERY EVENT.
>> RIBBON CUTTING NEXT THURSDAY.
IS ANYBODY I GUESS UNABLE TO COME?
>> YOU'RE GOING TO COME TO BRING HER DOWN THERE?
>> A FREE HOT-DOG OR SOMETHING?
>> I GOT SOME MAKING UP TO DO.
>> THAT'S GOOD. I WOULDN'T EXPECT TO SEE YOU.
>> PERFECT. YEAH. IF YOU GUYS SEE MY WIFE, LET HER KNOW THAT IT'S ALMOST OVER.
[01:15:03]
THANK HER PROFUSELY.I WILL BE IN CONTACT ABOUT TRYING TO GET THIS FINAL REPORT DONE FOR JUNE AND ANYTHING ELSE FOR THE GOOD OF THE ORDER?
>> THANK YOU, EVERYBODY. THANK YOU KEN.
>> NICE.
* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.