Sep 27, 2022 School Board Meeting

>> YOUR HONOR, I AM FINE WITH DEALING WITH THEM SEPARATELY [INAUDIBLE]

>> I UNDERSTAND.

>> OKAY.

>> ANYTHING ELSE? OKAY. THEN CAN I GET A MOTION TO ACCEPT THE CONSENT AGENDA WITH THE CHANGES THAT I RECOMMENDED OR NOT THOSE.

>> I WILL MAKE A MOTION TO ACCEPT THE AGENDA WITH THE CHANGES TO TAKE 6.01 AND MOVE IT UP TO 0.4 MATTERS RESERVED FOR BOARD ACTION.

THEN WHEN WE GET TO 0.8 IN THE SUPERINTENDENT CONSENT AGENDA, PAUSE TO DISCUSS 8.04 AND 8.06.

>> THEN ALSO TO ADD 4.02 OR 4.03 FOR THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY DISCUSSION.

>> YES, AND 4.03, WE DISCUSS GENERAL ASSEMBLY.

>> THANK YOU. A LITTLE BIT CONVOLUTED, BUT WE GOT IT ALL.

IT'S BEEN MOVED THAT WE ADOPT THE AGENDA WITH THE FOLLOWING CHANGES.

WE'RE GOING TO MOVE ITEM 6.01 TO BE PART OF THE MONITORING REVIEW PROCESS, 4.01 AND WE'RE GOING TO ADD 4.03 WHICH IS A DISCUSSION OF GENERAL ASSEMBLY.

THEN YOU ARE GOING TO DEFINITELY DISCUSS ITEMS 8.05 AND 8.06 AS PART OF THE CONSENT AGENDA.

INSIDE OF THAT TIME, WHEN WE NEED TO VOTE ON THEM SEPARATELY OR AS PART OF THE CONSENT AGENDA.

ALL THOSE IN FAVOR. PLEASE SIGNIFY BY SAYING AYE.

>> ALL CLOSED. WE HAVE THE AGENDA AS AMENDED,

[00:10:05]

ADOPTED AND WE MOVE FORWARD. THANK YOU EVERYBODY.

[3. PUBLIC COMMENT [GC-3.3]]

NEXT ITEM ON THE AGENDA [NOISE] IS ITEM 3.01, WHICH IS TO RECEIVE PUBLIC COMMENT AS THOSE WHO HAVE BEEN HERE BEFORE, YOU'VE HEARD ME SAY MANY A TIME.

A PUBLIC COMMENT IS NOT A TIME FOR DISCUSSION, IT'S A TIME FOR US TO HEAR FROM THE COMMUNITY, FROM MEMBERS OF THE AUDIENCE.

WHAT THEY'RE FEELING OR WHAT THEY'RE THINKING ABOUT DIFFERENT THINGS THAT ARE GOING ON.

IT IS NOT A TIME THAT WE COMMENT BACK.

WE LISTEN, WE MAY ASK CLARIFYING QUESTIONS, WE MAY DELEGATE A RESPONSE TO A PARTICULAR BOARD MEMBER OR A MEMBER OF THE EXACT TEAM OR SUPERINTENDENT.

FOR THOSE THAT DON'T APPRECIATE SPEAKING IN FRONT OF A GROUP OR USING A MICROPHONE OUR EMAIL ADDRESSES AND CONTACT INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE ON THE WEBSITE AND WE CAN BE CONTACTED IN THOSE MANNERS AS WELL.

THERE ARE SOME OTHER ODD OPPORTUNITIES THAT ARE ON THE WEBSITE AS FAR AS CONTACT.

EACH MEMBER THAT SPEAKS DOES NEED TO SIGN, AGAIN THAT'S PART OF THE OPEN PUBLIC MEETING RULES.

EACH PERSON IS GIVEN THREE MINUTES TO SPEAK.

KELLY SERVES AS MY TIMEKEEPER.

PLEASE IF YOU HEAR HER TIMER GO OFF, PLEASE WRAP YOUR COMMENTS UP SO THAT WE DON'T HAVE TO.

IT'S JUST MUCH NICER IF YOU FINISH WHERE YOU WANTED TO.

WE DID HAVE JENIFER DURACCO THAT SIGNED UP VIA EMAIL, BUT AS FAR AS I KNOW, SHE'S NOT HERE WITH US.

THEN I HAVE DOM FONG.

>> GOOD EVENING. IN MY REMARKS AT A BOARD MEETING LAST MONTH, I TALKED ABOUT ANTHONY FAUCI'S REVERSAL FROM PUBLICLY PRAISING NATURAL IMMUNITY IN 2004 TO FORCEFULLY ADVOCATING FULL VACCINATION ON ALL AMERICANS SINCE THE VACCINATIONS FIRST ROLLED OUT IN THE LATE 2020.

RECENTLY, FAUCI WAS IN THE NEWS AGAIN, BUT HE ADMITTED THAT ALL BAND-AIDS IN RESPONSE TO THE CORONA VIRUS WERE DRACONIAN AND HAVE DETRIMENTAL EFFECTS ON SCHOOL CHILDREN.

I'M GOING TO LET HIS WORDS SPEAK FOR THEMSELVES BY READING SOME EXCERPTS FROM AN ARTICLE TITLED, FAUCI ADMITS HE KNEW DRACONIAN MANDATES AND LOCKDOWNS WOULD HARM CHILDREN, AUSTRALIANEWS.COM.

FAUCI MADE THESE COMMENTS AT THE ATLANTIC FESTIVAL, WHICH LASTED FROM SEPTEMBER 21ST THROUGH THE 23RD, AND FEATURED WELL-KNOWN FIGURES IN THE MEDIA AND THE GOVERNMENT, AS WELL AS POLITICAL ACTIVISTS.

OF COURSE, WHEN YOU MAKE RECOMMENDATIONS, IF THE PRIMARY GOAL, WHEN YOU ARE WE RE-DEALING WITH A SITUATION WHERE THE HOSPITALS WILL BE OVERRUN IN NEW YORK, INTENSIVE CARE UNITS WERE BEING PUT IN THE HALLWAYS, YOU HAVE TO DO SOMETHING THAT'S RATHER DRACONIAN, THE DOCTOR ADMITTED.

SOMETIMES WHEN YOU DO DRACONIAN THINGS, IT HAS COLLATERAL NEGATIVE CONSEQUENCES.

JUST LIKE WHEN YOU SHUT THINGS DOWN, EVEN TEMPORARILY, IT DOES HAVE DELETERIOUS CONSEQUENCES ON THE ECONOMY [INAUDIBLE] FIRST OF ALL, HIS FALSE PREMISE HAS TO BE EXPOSED BECAUSE THE 1,000-BED HOSPITAL SHIP CALLED COMFORT TREATED ONLY 182 NEW YORK CITY PATIENTS IN APRIL 2020.

SECOND, LISTENING TO THESE STATEMENTS IN FRONT OF THE MEDICAL EXPERTS, I HAVE TO WONDER WHAT KIND OF SCIENCE THAT FAUCI FOLLOWS THAT WOULD GIVE HIM THE MORAL JUSTIFICATION FOR TREATING CHILDREN AS BEING EXPENDABLE, GIVEN THE FACT THAT THEY ARE AGE GROUP IS THE LEAST THREATENED BY THE VIRUS? WHY IS AN UNELECTED BUREAUCRAT LIKE FAUCI, GIVEN SO MUCH POWER TO PUSH FOR HARMFUL AND DESTRUCTIVE POLICIES ON THE LIVES AND LIVELIHOOD OF SOUTH AMERICANS AS A WHOLE AND ON THE EDUCATION AND WELL-BEING OF CHILDREN IN PARTICULAR.

ONE CAN SEE THAT FAUCI WANTS TO AVOID THE SCRUTINY OF HIS WORDS AND AND DEEDS BY ANNOUNCING HIS RESIGNATION AT THE END OF THE YEAR.

I BELIEVE THE ONLY FAIR AND JUST RESOLUTION IS TO LAUNCH A POLL INVESTIGATION.

[NOISE] CHARGE HIM WITH CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY AND

[00:15:02]

MONEY LAUNDERING IN THE FORM OF ROYALTY PAYMENTS AND PUT HIM, AMONG OTHERS, ON TRIAL JUST LIKE THE NUREMBERG TRIALS THAT WERE CARRIED OUT AFTER THE WORLD WAR II.

THANK YOU.

>> THANK YOU.

>> THANK YOU DOM. THAT IS EVERYBODY I HAVE ON MY LIST? I DON'T KNOW.

[NOISE] CAN YOU WRITE AT PAUL ROSTER, PLEASE? I CAN [INAUDIBLE] AND THEN JANE ROSTER AS WELL.

>> ARE WE GOOD, SIR?

>> I'M GOOD. THANK YOU.

REAL QUICK. I DON'T WANT THIS TO COUNT ALL THE TIME, BUT DOM, I WANT TO RECOGNIZE THIS MAN.

I'VE LEARNED THAT HE'S BEEN DOING THIS FOR THE LAST YEAR.

DOES ANYBODY IN THIS ROOM KNOWS DOM'S FULL STORY? RAISE YOUR HAND, PLEASE. YOU DON'T? AT AROUND IN HIS TEENS, HE ESCAPED FROM VIETNAM, A COMMUNIST COUNTRY.

HIS WHOLE FAMILY DID.

HE HAS BEEN DOWN THIS ROAD OF COMMUNISM AND TYRANNY.

HE KNOWS WHAT HE'S TALKING ABOUT, HE'S THE ONLY CITIZEN IN THIS ROOM THAT HAS GROUNDING IN THAT SITUATION.

KEEP THAT IN MIND.

AS THIS MAN GETS UP AND CONTINUES TO FIGHT AGAINST TYRANNY.

HE IS A BRAVE MAN, A BRAVE SOUL, AND HE NEEDS YOU-ALL'S SOME RESPECT.

[INAUDIBLE] AND HIS BATCH ARE BASICALLY A MILITARY LEVEL SCION PERPETRATED ON THE WORLD POPULATION.

DR. YEADON, A FORMER PFIZER EXECUTIVE CLAIMS IT'S PRETTY MUCH A GENOCIDE.

DR. MALONE, DR. WOLF, EDWARD DOWD, THE FORMER BLACKROCK GUY ARE SAYING SIMILAR.

THE CDC'S RECORDS AND ACTIONS SUGGEST THINGS ARE NOT RIGHT WITH THE VAX.

PEOPLE ARE BEING HARMED.

KIDS ARE BEING HARMED.

THERE'LL BE MORE INJURIES AND MORE DEATHS WITH THIS VAX.

WE WILL SEE IT PLAY OUT IN THE NEXT SIX MONTHS TO A YEAR, PROBABLY NEXT FIVE YEARS.

PREPARE YOURSELVES AND PROVE ME WRONG.

MASKS DON'T WORK.

NOW WE HAVE REVERSION AND OTHER WEIRD STUFF HAPPENING WITH YOUNG KIDS, TRANSGENDERISM.

WE ALSO HAVE CENTRAL BANK DIGITAL CURRENCY BEING TALKED ABOUT MORE AND MORE, THE FED ALREADY HAS A PLAN TO GET RID OF THE DOLLAR.

THE EXEC CALLING HALF A COUNTRY TERRORIST IN HIS PHILADELPHIA SPEECH A COUPLE OF WEEKS AGO.

PLEASE UNDERSTAND FOR THE BOARD, I WANT YOU ALL TO UNDERSTAND THIS: YOU ALL ARE THE VANGUARDS TO KEEP IN THE COMMUNITY FREE AND SAFE FROM THE GRIPS OF TYRANNY.

PLEASE KEEP THIS IN MIND WHEN YOU EXECUTE YOUR DUTIES THAT YOU DO THAT.

WHEN YOU SAY THE PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE THAT YOU DO THAT AND THAT YOU DO NOT ALLOW YOURSELF, OPEN YOURSELF OR GIVE AWAY THE FREEDOM OF THIS NATION.

I ASKED OF YOU TO DO THAT, PLEASE.

IN THE LAST YEAR, THERE'S JUST BEEN TOO MUCH DIVISIVENESS, THERE'S TOO MUCH WRONGHEADEDNESS.

TOO MUCH FOREIGN POLICY.

WE NEED TO CHANGE GEARS.

EITHER WE'RE GOING TO SINK TOGETHER OR WE'RE GOING TO SWIM TOGETHER.

SINKING TOGETHER MEANS WE ACCEPT THE TYRANNY, WE ACCEPT THE COVID STUFF.

WE DO WHAT WE'RE TOLD.

WE GET IN LINE.

WE GIVE OURSELVES TO TYRANNY.

[NOISE] IF WE SWIM, WE ALL COME TOGETHER AND WE REALIZE, NO, THIS SHALL NOT PASS.

PLEASE DO THE RIGHT THING.

A LOT OF PEOPLE ARE COUNTING ON YOU. THAT'S ALL I HAVE.

>> THANK YOU [INAUDIBLE]

>> HELLO. I'M JANE ROSTER AND [NOISE] I WANT TO THANK YOU ALL FOR YOUR TIME.

I KNOW THAT BEING ON THIS BOARD TAKES A LOT OF TIME.

IT TAKES LOT OF ENERGY AND I KNOW YOU'RE ALL DEDICATED TO FERNDALE AND SO THANK YOU.

[00:20:01]

I JUST WANT TO SAY IT'S BEEN AWHILE SINCE I'VE BEEN IN THE ROOM.

I'VE BEEN WATCHING A LOT OF THINGS HAPPEN.

I'M STILL DEALING WITH A LOT OF PERSONAL THINGS THAT ARE MALICIOUS AND CRUEL AND BEYOND ANYBODY'S WORST NIGHTMARE.

HAVING BEEN AN OUTSPOKEN ACTIVIST, I SUPPOSE, I CAN UNDERSTAND WHY MOST PEOPLE AVOID THE PITCH LATE.

BECAUSE THE PUNISHMENT IS SEVERE, AND IT'S ONE THING WHEN THE PUNISHMENT IS ON YOU, IT'S ANOTHER THING WHEN THEY'VE TURNED IT INTO YOUR CHILD.

THEY'VE ESSENTIALLY WITHHELD MY CHILD THROUGH LEGAL KIDNAPPING BECAUSE OF MY OUTSPOKENNESS.

I CAN UNDERSTAND WHY MOST OF YOU CHOOSE TO GO ALONG FOR THE RIDE.

BUT WHAT TOM AND PAUL HAVE SAID IS EXTREMELY TRUE.

THEY CAN TAKE MY CHILD, THEY CAN TAKE MY LIFE, BUT THEY CAN'T TAKE MY SOUL AND THEY CAN'T TAKE THE TRUTH.

THE FACT OF MATTER IS THAT WE RECALL ALL OF US IN ONE FORM OR ANOTHER, PERPETUATED TO A LIE.

WORSE THAN THAT, WE'RE PAYING OUR TAX IN DOLLARS TO GO TOWARDS A COLLUSION, IN MY OPINION, BETWEEN SADLY, LOADS OF COINTELPRO SITUATION, SO IT'S NOT JUST OUR DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE.

IT IS MANY DEPARTMENTS [NOISE] OF DEFENSE AS WELL AS BIG TECH AND BIG PHARMA AND HIS BIG MONEY, GENERATES A LOT OF CASH.

THERE YOU GO, AND PEOPLE WHO HAVE INVESTED IN THESE COMPANIES ARE DOING WELL.

THOSE WHO HAD AN INVESTMENT IN THEIR CHILDREN'S LIVES, WE HAVE BEEN INFILTRATED THROUGH THEIR ELECTRONIC DEVICES WITHOUT THEIR KNOWLEDGE OR CONSENT, WHOSE CHILDREN HAVE BEEN STOPPED AND OTHER THINGS OUT OF MY CONTROL, FOR EXAMPLE.

OUR INVESTMENT IS AT VERY BEST COMPROMISED AND THE WORST IS IT'S LOST IN THE WAY THAT CAN NEVER BE REPAID NO MATTER HOW MUCH MONEY SOMEBODY WOULD TURN ON OUR FACE.

YOU GUYS ARE ON THE FRONTLINE.

I THINK IT'S IMPORTANT TO PEEL BACK AGAIN AND SEE.

I'M GENERALLY AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTIVIST ON THE BLUE SIDE OF THE EQUATION.

I KNOW [NOISE] I'M NOT ON THE RED SIDE OR THE BLUE SIDE OR WHITE SIDE OR BLACK SIDE OR ANYBODY'S SIDE, EXCEPT FOR OUR SIDE, AGAIN IN THIS SIDE.

THE CHILDREN'S SIDE, TRUTH'S SIDE.

I STAND FOR TRUTH.

WE HAVE ALL BEEN LIED TO AND MANY PEOPLE HAVE DECIDED TO ACTUATE THAT LIE AND HAVE REFUSED TO LOOK BEHIND [NOISE] AND SEE WHAT'S ACTUALLY GOING ON.

PLEASE, PAY ATTENTION. THANK YOU.

>> THANK YOU, JEAN. THAT BRINGS US TO THE END OF OUR PUBLIC COMMENT TIME.

AGAIN, IF THERE ARE THOSE THAT HAVE COMMENTS AND YOU DIDN'T HAVE A CHANCE TO SEE ME TO VOICE THOSE OR WANT TO, OUR CONTACT INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE ON THE WEBSITE.

WE WELCOME YOUR THOUGHTS AND COMMENTS. THANK YOU.

[4. MATTERS RESERVED FOR BOARD ACTION]

NEXT ITEM ON OUR AGENDA TONIGHT IS ITEM 4.01, WHICH IS TO REVIEW THE MONITORING REPORT PROCESS.

WE JUST STARTED TALKING ABOUT THIS [NOISE] ARCH SPECIAL SESSION IN A COUPLE OF WEEKS AGO AND WE WANTED TO CONTINUE THAT PROCESS AND TO HELP EXPLAIN THAT BETTER.

WE'VE GOT THE MONITORS HERE AND WE'VE GOT THINGS THAT HAVE NEVER BEEN USED TO REPORT AN OPERATIONAL EXPECTATIONS 12, WHICH IS SAFETY, AS THE DEMONSTRATION MODEL TO WALK THROUGH THE PROCESS.

IF YOU LOOK IN YOUR PACKETS, CHRIS WAS SO KIND TO PROVIDED.

HERE IS A COPY.

THESE ARE ALSO AVAILABLE ON BOARD DOCS FOR THOSE WHO ARE LOOKING.

BUT THERE'S A HARD COPY OF POLICY OE12.

THERE IS ALSO A COPY OF THE MONITORING REPORT.

IF YOU WANT TO LOOK AT THOSE, GO BACK AND FORTH AND TRYING TO SPACE ONLINE.

ESSENTIALLY, WHAT OUR GOAL IS AND OR PLAN PER SE IS THAT WE GET THE REPORTS, BEAR ME FOR A SECOND [NOISE] AS I'M GOING TO CHANGE TO THE CALENDAR SO THAT THIS IS THE RIGHT DATE.

>> IF I'M GOING TO POP THE CALENDAR.

>> YEAH, IF YOU CAN POP THE CALENDAR THEN EVERYBODY CAN SEE IT.

[00:25:02]

IF YOU LOOK AT THE CALENDAR THERE, IT DOES SAY OCTOBER 2022 AND THAT IS CORRECT.

IF YOU LOOK AT THE TOP THERE, THE 27, RIGHT UNDER TUESDAY IS THE TONIGHT'S MEETING AND IT'S NOT LISTED ON THERE BUT THAT'S WHERE WE'RE AT, AND THEN YOU'LL ALSO SEE ESSENTIALLY THE PROCESS BEING PROCESSED THAT WE'RE ROLLING OUT IS, OKAY, THE STARTING POINT WE CAN WORK FROM THEN IS WE WOULD GET THE MONITORING REPORTS AND WE'RE GOING TO PRETEND THAT WE HAVE AN ADOBE 12 AND R 2.2, THE MATHEMATICS PRIOR TO THIS.

BUT ESSENTIALLY WE WOULD GET THEM ON THE MEETING NIGHT OF THE 27TH AT THE SAME TIME, A SURVEY IS GOING TO GO OUT AND THAT'S THE SURVEY THAT WE WILL BE LOOKING AT IN A SECOND, THAT ALLOWS SOME BOARD MEMBERS TO ESSENTIALLY IT WORKS HAND-IN-HAND WITH THE REPORT, IF YOU FOLLOW THROUGH YOU CAN DO THAT IN JUST A SECOND.

THAT REPORT WILL THEN WILL BE BACK TO BACK ON THE 7TH, SO ESSENTIALLY A WEEK-AND-A-HALF LATER.

AS THIS SAYS, YOU'VE GOT THE SURVEYS DO FOR OE 12 FOR SAFETY.

IT DOES SAY OE 6 BUT WE'RE DELAYING THAT ONE MONTH JUST BECAUSE WE WANTED TO KEEP IT SIMPLE WITH THE INITIAL PROCESS AND OUR 2.2 FOR MATHEMATICS.

BOTH THOSE REPORTS WE HAVE, WE'VE GOT THE SAFETY SURVEYS OUT THERE. YOU'VE HAD A CHANCE.

IT WAS BOTH IN THIS WAY AS WELL AS ON MORE DOCS TO TAKE A LOOK AT AND WE'LL WALK THROUGH IN A SECOND.

BUT WE'LL GET THOSE SURVEYS GIVEN TO EACH OF THE BOARD MEMBERS THAT HAS TO RESPOND TO THE SURVEYS, PUT COMMENTS IN, GET THOSE SURVEYS BACK TO CHRIS BY THE 7TH, AND THEN SHE WILL COMPILE THOSE RESULTS, GET THEM BACK OUT TO US ON THE 14TH, ESSENTIALLY A WEEK LATER, WHICH THEN GIVES US A WEEK-AND-A-HALF TO LOOK THROUGH TO EVALUATE THE OTHER BOARD MEMBERS DOCS, THINK ABOUT ON OURSELVES TO SEE WHETHER WE AGREE, DISAGREE, WHATEVER THOUGHTS, IF WE HAVE QUESTIONS, AND THEN WE COME BACK TO THE MEETING ON OCTOBER 25TH TO DISCUSS THOSE IN THE PUBLIC SETTING.

BUT IT GIVES US A CHANCE TO HEAR INTO ANY OTHER BOARD MEMBERS THOUGHTS FOR THE FIRST TIME SINCE WE HAVING TIME TO THINK ABOUT IT OR TO CLARIFY.

QUESTIONS SO FAR? DOES THAT MAKE SENSE? HOPEFULLY THE PICTURE, THAT'S ONE PIECE AND WE'LL HAVE THE OTHER PIECES [INAUDIBLE] ALL THERE.

>> ORDINARILY OF THIS WHERE WE GOT THE SAFETY REPORT AT THE JULY BUSINESS MEETING THAT WE GOT THE NON-ANNEX ONE AT THE AUGUST BUSINESS MEETING.

BUT ONCE WE GET INTO A CYCLE OF THIS, WE WOULD HAVE GOTTEN THE MATHEMATICS AND SAFETY AND THE PUBLIC WOULD FIRST LAY EYES ON THIS MEETING.

>> CORRECT.

FEEL FREE TO STOP ME AT ANY POINT.

>> SO FAR SO GOOD.

SO THEN WE WILL HAVE THE LINK WHICH AGAIN IS IN THE EXECUTIVE PORTION OF THE BOARD DOCS BECAUSE IT'S A LINK TO A SURVEY FOR US TO FILL OUT.

THE SURVEY YOU'LL SEE FOLLOWS THE OE12.

JUST AS A REMINDER OR A REFRESHER, OE12 IS THE POLICY THAT THE BOARD PUT TOGETHER.

THOSE ARE THE STATEMENTS THERE.

THE REPORT THAT WE DID IS A COMBINATION OF THE INTERPRETATIONS THAT ARE MADE BY THE SUPERINTENDENT AND EXECUTIVE TEAM [NOISE] AND THEN THE INDICATORS THAT THEY HAVE TO GO ALONG WITH IT.

WITHIN THE WRITTEN REPORT, WE HAVE ITEMS. SO UNDER SECTION 1, WE HAVE ITEMS 1.2, 1.3, 1.4 THAT WE CAN LOOK AT.

WE'VE GOT THE QUESTIONS UP THERE CORRESPONDING THAT WE CAN MARK AS EITHER IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING EXCEPTIONS, EXCUSE ME.

IF YOU DO HAVE EXCEPTIONS, WE DO ASK THAT PEOPLE WRITE THOSE DOWN IN THE COMMENTS SO WE KNOW WHAT WERE YOU FEELING WAS NOT IN COMPLIANCE.

THAT DOES NOT MEAN THAT IF IT IS IN COMPLIANCE OR NOT IN COMPLIANCE THAT YOU CAN'T MAKE A COMMENT.

IT JUST IS A MATTER OF IF YOU DO SAY THAT IT'S NOT, WE WANT TO KNOW WHY BECAUSE THAT'S WHAT WE'LL USE AS INPUT AS WE GIVE DIRECTION TO THE SUPERINTENDENT AND EXEC TEAM AS TO WHAT NEEDS TO BE CHANGED AND GIVE US COMPLIANCE WITH THE POLICY.

IT'S ALSO A PLACE DOWN IN THAT COMMENT SECTION WHERE YOU CAN PUT ANY COMMENTS ABOUT EITHER THE INDICATORS OR THE ACTUAL MATERIALS IN THE POLICY BECAUSE BASED ON THE CALENDAR,

[00:30:04]

WE'D COME BACK ON OCTOBER 25TH TO REVIEW THE POLICY AND VOTE ON IT OR ON THE COURT, WHETHER IT IS COMPLIANT, NON-COMPLIANT, OR PARTIALLY COMPLIANT IN CASES, THOUGH, WE REPORT.

THEN THE FOLLOWING MONTH IN NOVEMBER.

I APOLOGIZE THIS PART, THINK THEY GET PUT ON THE CALENDAR AT OUR NOVEMBER 29TH MEETING, THEN COME BACK AND DISCUSS THE ACTUAL POLICY TO CLOSE TO CIRCLE IF THERE ARE CHANGES, ADJUSTMENTS WHAT WE'RE DOING WITH 011 TONIGHT AND MORE CYNICISM CAN COME JANUARY.

BUT AGAIN, ADDRESSING SECTION 7.

WE DON'T WE HAVE ANY PROBLEMS WITH THE ONGOING HIGH SCHOOL CHAPTER. YEAH.

AT SOME POINT IN THIS PROCESS AND MAYBE I JUST MISSED IT, BUT WHEN DO WE ALL GET TO SEE RESULTS IN THE SURVEY AND READ THE OTHER BOARD MEMBERS COMMENTS SO THAT WE CAN COUNTER PARADIGM IT IN DISCUSSION.

EXACTLY. LOOKING AT THE CALENDAR AND I ONLY USE IT SO I HAVE DATES IN MY HEAD.

OCTOBER 7TH IS WHEN THE SURVEY FROM EACH INDIVIDUAL BOARD MEMBERS DO BACK TO CHRIS ON OCTOBER 14TH IS WHEN SHE WILL CHANGE AND [INAUDIBLE] HAVE COMPILE THOSE RESULTS AND THEN GIVE THEM BACK TO US.

THAT GIVES US, LIKE I SAID, ABOUT A WEEK-AND-A-HALF TO REVIEW THOSE BEFORE WE COME TO THE MEETING ON THE 25TH DISCUSSION.

JUST FOR CLARIFICATION.

YEAH.

HE POSTED UP THERE. IT'S HARD TO HEAR DAVID REVIEWED JULY 26, 22.

THE OPTIONS ARE COMPLIANT, NON-COMPLIANT COMPLIANCE, COORDINATING WITH WHAT I'M SEEING ON THE SCREEN.

I'M JUST WONDERING WHAT SEE GONE SEE OR WHETHER HE HAD CHANGED? BASICALLY, THE PROBLEM WE'VE GOT A CLERICAL AND WE PROBABLY NEED TO CHANGE THAT IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING EXCEPTIONS TO MOST COMPLIANT SOMETHING WE DIDN'T CATCH HIM THE ROUGH DRAFT.

[OVERLAPPING] I ACTUALLY LIKE THAT BETTER THAN.

I'VE STATED BEFORE PARTIAL COMPLIANT DOESN'T FLY WITH ME.

I RATHER HAVE THAT RATHER THAN PARTIALLY COMPLIANT.

PERSONALLY THAT'S JUST MY DOC.

WE CAN LEAVE IT LIKE THAT. IT'S LESS EDITING.

[LAUGHTER] BASICALLY IN MY MIND, THE REAL MEAT OF IT IS, WHAT IS THE COMMENT THAT'S MADE? WHAT PART DOES NOT COMPLY AND THE PARTIAL COMPLIANT OR IN WHICHEVER TERMINOLOGY YOU USE.

THE COMMENTS OR THE PLACE WHERE THE RUBBER MEETS THE ROAD IN MY MIND.

WE'RE OPEN, AGAIN THIS IS A [NOISE] WE'RE THROWING IT OUT THERE AND TRYING TO IMPROVE AND TRYING TO GET, GENERATE BETTER DISCUSSION AND GIVE PEOPLE TIME TO THINK ABOUT IT.

I THINK THE COMMENT, PLEASE ADD EXPLANATION IN THE COMMENTS BOX BELOW.

YOU HAVEN'T ONLY ON THE EXCEPTIONS.

I'M SOMEBODY WHO YOU WERE SAYING, NOT COMPLIANCE.

YOU WANT THEM TO EXPLAIN IT THERE TOO.

THEN ALSO IF IT ISN'T COMPLIANCE, BUT YOU'VE GOT TO LIKE, GREAT KUDOS, OR WE NEED TO DO MORE OF THIS OR SOME OTHER COMMENT.

YOU MADE A COMMENT AS WELL.

I THINK THE WHOLE THING OF MADE COMMENTS BELOW IS NOT ON THE BOARD.

IF YOU HAVE SOMETHING TO SAY, YOU AGREE OR DISAGREE, YOU MAY HAVE COMMUNISTS.

THAT'S WHAT WE DO. MAKE SURE THERE'S A COMMENT BOX THERE, AND USE IT.

I WILL ADD THAT.

FOR EXAMPLE, 1.3 IS MADE SO YOU HAVE TO LEARN ON THOSE AND COMMENT OR IS IT OPTIONAL? IF SOMEONE REALLY DIDN'T HAVE COMMENTS THEY WANT TO MAKE, YOU DON'T HAVE TO, BUT IT'S GOING TO POP UP.

THAT'S ALWAYS AN OPTION. YEAH.

[INAUDIBLE] AS I SAID, IN COMPLIANCE AND THEN UNDERNEATH IT, IT SAID IT OTHER.

WHICH IS [INAUDIBLE] WAS THAT.

[BACKGROUND] IT COULDN'T HAVE BEEN ANY OF YOU THAT HAVE [INAUDIBLE]? THEY'RE OPTIONAL.

THEY'RE OPTIONAL.

I DON'T KNOW WHAT THAT IS. [OVERLAPPING] YEAH. PUTTING TOGETHER THESE THEY ALWAYS LOOK REALLY GOOD, BUT PUTTING THEM TOGETHER AS EXERCISES AND CUTTING.

THIS IS WHY WE'RE DOING THIS.

SO FAR.

SO GOOD OR QUESTIONS OR ANY OTHER CONTINENTS?

[00:35:05]

JUST GO BACK TO MY NOTES TO MAKE SURE THAT I MISSED IN THE PROCESS.

I DO THIS THE OTHER NIGHT OR YESTERDAY.

I HAD A SAFETY THE FULL REPORT OPEN AND THEN I HAVE MY GOOGLE DOC SURVEY NEXT TO IT, LIKE A SPLIT SCREEN THING.

YOU CAN PUT ONE ON ONE SIDE AND ONE ON THE OTHER.

THEY ACTUALLY FIT REALLY WELL BECAUSE IT WOULD BE THE WHOLE THING AND MY SHUFFLING BACK FROM ONE PAGE TO THE OTHER SOMETIMES CAN BE A HEADACHE.

JUST BEST PRACTICE SUGGESTIONS SPLIT YOUR SCREEN, NOT ONE ON ONES I BELONG TOGETHER AND HELPS TO REMEMBER WHAT YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT.

>> AGAIN ENDS WITH MELINDA, I LIKE IT.

THEN WE GET THIS SURVEY RESULTS BACK FROM CHRIS AND GET EVERYBODY'S INPUT.

WE HAVE TIME TO CHEW ON IT.

THEN WE COME TO OUR MEETING ON THE 25TH, WHICH IS THE TIME TO DISCUSS IT AND ASK QUESTIONS AND GO, YES I AGREE, NO I DON'T AGREE, HASH IT OUT.

IF YOU LOOK IN YOUR PACKET, AGAIN, THERE IS THIS TWO PAGE STAPLED TOGETHER DOCUMENT.

BASICALLY WHAT IT IS, IT'S IS FILL IN THE BOXES, FILL IN THE LINES THAT BASICALLY PUTS TOGETHER A REPORT.

ESSENTIALLY THE WAY THAT WORKS IF WE GET THE SURVEY BACK.

I'M GOING TO KEEP THIS SIMPLE SO THAT HOPEFULLY YOU DON'T LOSE ANYONE.

THERE'S THREE COMMENTS THAT ARE MADE WITHIN THAT SURVEY.

I KNOW FROM THIS WE HAVE MANY MORE.

BUT IF THERE'S THREE COMMENTS, AND WE TALK ABOUT THIS THREE COMMENTS WE GO BACK AND FORTH AND WE DECIDED, ONE AND THREE, WE DON'T CARE FOR THOSE NUMBER 2 WE REALLY THINK IS IMPORTANT THAT NEEDS TO BE PART OF OUR FINAL REPORT, THEN WE CAN UTILIZE THIS.

IN THIS CASE IT'S AN OPERATIONAL EXPECTATIONS POLICIES SO IT'S A SECOND PAGE, WE DETERMINED IF WE'RE, COMPLIANT OR NON-COMPLIANT.

THEN WE CAN SAY WITH THESE COMMENTS, THAT ARE IN CONSENSUS OF THE GROUP, BECAUSE THOSE ARE THE THINGS THAT WE WANT THE EXECUTIVE BOARD AND THE SUPERINTENDENT TO BE FOCUSING ON WORKING ON DEPENDING ON WHAT THE COMMENTS ARE.

THAT PROVIDES THEM WITH A CHECKLIST PROVIDED THEM WITH ACCOUNTABILITY AS WE COME BACK THE FOLLOWING YEAR OR THE FOLLOWING THE MOVIE CYCLE.

IF YOU NOTICE ON THE BOTTOM THERE IT HAS ON THEIR SOMETHING CAN POTENTIALLY BE LOOKING AT AND WHERE WE LOOK AT FREQUENCY OF REVIEWING THE REPORTS BECAUSE SOME OF THE POLICIES WE MAY FIND EVERY YEAR IS MORE THAN SUFFICIENT.

OTHERS DEFINITELY NEED TO GROW PER YEAR AND THEN WE CAN MAKE THOSE DECISIONS WHEN WE COME AROUND AND THE POLICY WILL BE THE FOLLOWING MONTH.

QUESTIONS, COMMENTS, AGAIN GET VERY WELL-MEANING THAT WE HAVE MULTIPLE COMMENTS DIDN'T VOTE ON, AND WHEN WE NAME ON ONE OR TWO AT A TIMES OR WE MAY PUT ON DIFFERENT ONES BACK AND FORTH BUT THAT'S PART OF THAT ROBUST DISCUSSION THAT THIS GROUP COULD HAVE HAD.

>> I THINK WHEN WE GET ALL THE COMMENTS BACK FROM CHRIS, THE ONES THAT SHE WOULD CALL IT MID-MONTH.

WHEN WE COME TO OUR MEETING AT THE END OF THE MONTH, WE DON'T HAVE TO DISCUSS EVERY SINGLE COMMENT.

WE ONLY DISCUSSED THE ONES THAT WE MAKE A MOTION ON TO DISCUSS, RIGHT? THEN WE'LL TALK ABOUT THOSE, THEN WE'LL DECIDE TO VOTE ON THEM OR NOT, AND ONLY THE ONES WE VOTE ON AND APPROVE WOULD GO INTO THIS BRIEF ONE-PAGE THING.

>> THERE'S TIMES WHERE I MIGHT THINK I WANT TO MAKE SOME COMMENT, BUT I DON'T NECESSARILY WANT TO CHANGE THE DIRECTION OF THE DISTRICT ON SOMETHING.

>> YEAH. AGAIN, THERE MAY BE TIMES WHEN WE'RE TALKING, KUDOS TO THIS THE OTHER DAY.

WE MAY NOT NEED THAT ON HERE NECESSARILY, OR WE MAY DEPENDING ON THE STRENGTH OF THE COMPLIMENT OR HOW STRONGLY WE FEEL ABOUT THE COMPLIMENT, OKAY? OTHER QUESTIONS.

>> YEAH. I LIKE THAT BUT CLARIFICATION IS GOOD, BUT I'M WONDERING I'M SURE SOME OF YOU PROBABLY ALREADY KNOW, BUT WE'RE ON THE CALENDAR.

>> THIS CALENDAR.

>> YES.

>> WE CAN CERTAINLY SEND THIS OUT.

BASICALLY WHAT WE SET IT UP, ONLINE WAS SILLY.

REALLY DOESN'T MATTER WHAT ABOUT THE DATE OF THE MONTH,

[00:40:01]

IT'S GOING TO BE MORE.

THE SURVEY WILL COME OUT AT THE TIME WE HAVE THE MEETING.

IT'LL BE DUE THE WEEK AFTER.

THE RESULTS WILL BE BACK THE NEXT WEEK AFTER THAT, AND THEN WE DISCUSS IT AT THE NEXT MEETING.

WE CAN CERTAINLY EASILY DIDN'T CALENDAR, SO WE CAN SERVE SURE.

SET UP A CALENDAR IF THAT IS EASIER FOR EVERYONE BECAUSE THERE AREN'T SOME OF THOSE MONTHS, SO THERE'S FIVE WEEKS THAT THROW THINGS OFF A LITTLE BIT OF A HICK UP.

NOT A PROBLEM WE CAN, GET THE CALENDAR TOGETHER?

>> YEAH. I THINK ALSO PEOPLE LIKE ME NEED TO SEE IT AND IN THE COMMUNITY THEY ALSO NEED TO HAVE THAT [INAUDIBLE] YEAH. WE CAN CERTAINLY PUT THAT ON EVEN HAVE IT AS PART, INCORPORATE IT WITH OE6A.

THE POLICY THAT ACTUALLY OUR CALENDAR.

>> WE COULD PUT IT WE CAN PUT IT RIGHT ON THAT PAGE WITHIN YOUR DOTS.

>> THE GC.

>> THE GC, YEAH, GC6.

>> YEAH, UNDER THERE.

>> BECAUSE I'M REMEMBERING RIGHT IN THE MIDDLE OF THIS, I KNOW.

>> THAT IS A GOOD IDEA.

>> THAT IS A GOOD IDEA AND NOW WE CAN JUST MODIFIED OR CHANGED.

WE CAN KEEP WORKING PARTS WE ARE COMING UP BECAUSE WHEN PEOPLE HAVE A PARTICULAR INTEREST IN MATHEMATICS OR WHATEVER'S COMING UP, THEY CAN BE THERE FOR THEIR REPORT.

OTHER SUGGESTIONS, COMMENTS, CLARIFICATIONS? AGAIN, JUST BECAUSE WE'RE TO START DOING THIS DOESN'T MEAN SET IN STONE.

I'M SURE AS WE GO THROUGH THE PROCESS WE'LL HAVE TWEAKS THAT WE'LL NEED TO MAKE AND AS WE SEE WHAT'S WORKING AND WHAT ISN'T.

>> ONE COMMENT I HAVE, I'M LOOKING DOWN AT THE FOOTER AND IT DOES STATE, YOU KNOW, AS TIMESTAMP LAST REVIEWED AND SO ON AND SO FORTH.

I WAS JUST CURIOUS AS TO WHO HAS ADMINISTRATIVE RIGHTS TO THESE POLICIES AND WHO CAN MAKE CHANGES.

IT'S READ ONLY DOCUMENT I'M SURE OR IT CAN ANNOUNCE THIS POLICY.

I WOULD LIKE TO KNOW WHO HAS ADMINISTRATIVE RIGHTS TO THIS POLICY, TO REWRITE IT.

>> WE DO IT.

>> WHO'S WE?

>> THE BOARD. I MEAN, THESE ONES THAT ARE PART OF OUR COHERENT GOVERNANCE, THAT WOULD BE THE PART WE WRESTLE WITH.

>> ARE YOU TALKING THIS BEFORE OR ARE YOU TALKING, WHICH ONE ARE YOU?

>> I'M TALKING ABOUT THE LONGITUDINAL OF COURSE?

>> WE INTERPRETED THE EXACT TEAM AND I INTERPRET WHAT THE POLICY MEANS, WHAT WE BELIEVE, HOW WE ARE INTERPRETING IT AND THEN WE WRITE THE REPORT, GATHER THE DATA BASED ON WHAT WE BELIEVE IS EVIDENCE TO EITHER DEMONSTRATE OR NOT DEMONSTRATE HOW ARE WE MEETING THAT POLICY. DOES THAT MAKES SENSE STEVE?

>> WELL, MY QUESTION IS WHO HAS ADMINISTRATIVE RIGHTS TO MAKE CHANGES TO THESE REPORTS?

>> LIKE WHO'S DOING THE TAKING?

>> YEAH, THESE DOCUMENTS ARE TIMESTAMP, RIGHT? WHAT I'M GETTING AT IS HOW DO I KNOW I HAVE THE LATEST AND GREATEST REVIEWED REPORT? AND THEN TYPICALLY, YOU KNOW, IT'S DONE BY AN ADMINISTRATOR.

SOMEBODY OWNS THIS DOCUMENT AND THERE'S ALWAYS SO MANY PEOPLE THAT CAN GO IN THERE AND MAKE REVISIONS TO THIS DOCUMENT.

I'M ASKING YOU WHO HAS THE RIGHTS TO MAKE REVISIONS ON THIS REPORT?

>> THE EXACT TEAM AND MYSELF AND THEN WE SUBMIT IT TO YOU.

>> OKAY, SO ALL EXACT TEAM CAN GO IN THERE?

>> WELL, I'LL TELL YOU THE WHOLE PROCESS.

WHAT HAPPENS IS LETS SAY MARK IS AS THERE SAY, AND ACTUALLY IF YOU LOOK ON GCOC, WE GIVE YOU WHO IS THE POINT PERSON.

IF IT'S IN AN OU REPORT, USUALLY I'M WORKING WITH MARK.

MARK GATHERS ALL THE DATA AND YOU MAY ASK, JOHN, DO YOU HAVE DATA AND MATCH THIS? KELLY, DO YOU HAVE SOMETHING FOR THIS? TRINA, THIS FEELS LIKE SOMETHING YOU MIGHT HAVE DATA ON AND THEN MARK, JACKSON, FAY AND MYSELF WOULD MEET IN A ROOM AND WE WILL WRESTLE WITH IT.

HOW ARE WE MAKING THIS MAKES SENSE, THINKING THAT OUR AUDIENCES IS THE BOARD AND THE COMMUNITY, AND MAKING SURE IT'S READABLE.

AND THE SETTLEMENT OF JACKSON DOES A FINE-TOOTHED COMB, RUNS IT OVER, BRADLEY SENDS IT BACK TO ME, CHRIS, SELENA, AND I READ IT AGAIN BEFORE WE SEND IT TO YOU.

>> OKAY, AND WHAT I'M DRIVING AT IS SIMILARLY,

[00:45:04]

IF I GO OUT AND I PRINT THIS REPORT, I WANT TO KNOW THAT I'M GETTING THE LATEST REVISION OF THIS REPORT AND IF MULTIPLE PEOPLE ARE MAKING CHANGES TO THE REPORT THEN I DON'T KNOW IF I'M GETTING THE LATEST REVISION.

>> THE ONE THAT WE UPLOAD IS THE LATEST.

FOR EXAMPLE, BASED ON OUR LAST CONVERSATION, I'M GOING TO GET THE NUMBERS NEXT TIME.

ONLY 11,IS THAT THE RIGHT ONE? THE ONLY 11, YOU HAD SOME QUESTIONS ABOUT IT SO THEN MARK AS THE AUTHOR, MAIN AUTHOR, I WENT BACK TO HIM.

HE MADE THE REVISIONS AND YOU'VE GOT THE UPDATED REPORT.

THAT'S THE ONE WE UPLOAD, THE LATEST AND GREATEST REPORT.

>> OKAY, THE OTHER THING THAT I THINK PROBABLY FITS INTO THAT AS WELL, IF YOU GO BACK TO THE CALENDAR FOR A SECOND, IS PREVIOUSLY WE HAD WHEN WE GOT THINGS AS FAR AS GUARD DOGS, IF I WOULD ASK A QUESTION AND THEN KELLY AND THEY WERE LIKE, THAT'S RIGHT.

THEY WOULD GO IN AND EDIT THE REPORTS AND THEN WE RE-UPLOAD IT TO WORD DOCS.

IF YOU LOOK AT, FOR EXAMPLE, WHAT DO YOU FEEL ABOUT TOMORROW? OCTOBER 18TH THERE THAT SAYS WORD DOCS IS LOCKED SO AS OF THAT POINT, THERE IS NOT GOING TO BE A CHANGE IN WHAT IS UPLOADED IN WORD DOCS MOVING FORWARD AND IF THERE IS A REVISION THAT IT WILL BE BROUGHT TO THE BOARD EITHER IN US SOME WAY OR AT THE MEETING SO THAT, THAT MAYBE DON'T HAVE, I READ THIS VERSION AND MAYBE READ THIS VERSION, AND YOU READ THE NEXT VERSION BECAUSE CHANGES WERE BEING MADE.

BECAUSE WE HAD TALKED ABOUT THAT IS CREATING A PROBLEM BECAUSE THERE WAS CHANGE MADE TO THE REPORT WHILE I READ IT BEFORE THAT AND SO I WAS THINKING THE SAME AS THEM.

>> THAT'S THE CLARIFICATION I WAS LOOKING FOR, IS I NEED TO KNOW THAT I'M GETTING THE LATEST AND GREATEST OF REVISIONS, RIGHT?

>> RIGHT, EXACTLY AND ULTIMATELY IF YOU CAN, CAN YOU PULL UP UNIVERSITY PLACE, THEIR UPSTA3.ORG, IF I'M NOT MISTAKEN.

>> YOUR AROUND THERE, KEVIN.

>> I'VE BEEN CALLED THAT BEFORE. THIS IS NOT.

HELP AND GO TO THEIR BOARD THAT BETH IS GOING TO SHOW THEM.

WE'RE MODELING OR WE LIKE THIS AND WE'VE BEEN USING IT TO GO TO THE POLICIES.

UNDER THE SCHOOL BOARD IT SHOWS THERE THEY HAVE THEIR POLICIES IN THEIR, UNDER POLICY GOVERNMENTS VERSUS COHERENT GOVERNANCE.

A LITTLE BIT DIFFERENT TERMINOLOGY.

BUT YOU CAN SEE THERE THEY HAVE THEIR POLICY, THEN THEY HAVE THE MONITORING REPORT, AND THEN THEY HAVE THE BOARDS RESPONSE, WHICH MAKES IT REAL EASY TO GO AND LOOK AT.

ULTIMATELY, THIS IS THE MODEL WE'VE BEEN LOOKING AT AND WITH THE HOPE OF GETTING SOMETHING TO THAT POINT BECAUSE AGAIN, IT MAKE REAL CLEAR.

YOU LOOK AT THE POLICY, SEE WHAT IT SAYS, YOU GO TO THAT MONITORING REPORT, HERE IS THE RESPONSE AND THEN WHAT DID THE BOARD THINK OF THAT WHAT ACTUALLY DO THEY GET FROM THE [INAUDIBLE] THE SUPERINTENDENT AND EXECUTIVE.

>> WE HAVE THAT IN OUR BOARD DOCS.

WE HAVE A TAB IN THE UPPER RIGHT AND IT SAYS [NOISE] POLICIES, AND YOU CAN GO AND FIND ALL POLICIES.

BUT LIKE DOWN AT THE BOTTOM THEN IT'LL SAY ADOPTED LIKE WHEN WE FIRST HAD THE POLICY, THEN REVISED.

BUT I THINK THAT WOULD BE A GOOD SPOT.

AFTER WE GET THROUGH THIS THREE OR FOUR MONTH PROCESS AND WE FIND A LITTLE BIT LIKE YEAH [NOISE] THAT'S OUR RESPONSE.

WE'RE DONE WITH THAT ONE, MOVING ON, UPDATING THAT REVISE DATE, AND THEN ATTACHING THE MONITORING REPORT AND OUR RESPONSE THERE.

IF SOMEBODY IS REALLY INTERESTED IN FOREIGN LANGUAGE AND THEY WANT TO LOOK IT UP BUT WE CAN'T REMEMBER, OH GOSH, WAS THAT APRIL, OR MAYBE IT WAS MAY, AND SO WE'RE SEARCHING THROUGH EVERYTHING, TO FIND THE LATEST AND GREATEST REPORT.

IT'S NO, YOU CAN GO TO POLICIES, [NOISE] LOOKUP THE POLICIES AND THERE IS THE ATTACHMENT.

>> WHAT IS OUR PROCESS FOR ANYTHING? WHAT DOES THAT LOOK LIKE?

>> ANYTHING IN THE POLICY?

>> YES.

>> LET'S GO TO THE CALENDAR.

[LAUGHTER] THAT'S THE PART THAT WAS MISSING, STEVE, AND THAT'S WHAT KEPT COMING UP.

WE ARE TALKING ABOUT POLICY AND THE FREQUENCY WE WANT TO LOOK AT.

IS IT REALLY MEETING WHAT WE WERE TRYING TO SAY? AFTER WE REVIEWED IT, WE'VE LOCKED THE RESPONSE, WE'VE SAID COMPLIANCE, NOT COMPLIANCE, COMPLIANCE WITH THESE EXCEPTIONS,

[00:50:02]

THEN WE'RE GOING TO JUST TAKE THE POLICY AND WE'RE GOING TO WRESTLE WITH JUST THE POLICY.

IS IT THE RIGHT WORDING? IS THIS THE POLICY WE WANT? DOES IT GET TO WHAT IT IS WE WERE HOPING? BECAUSE BASED ON THE INTERPRETATION, THE DATA YOU'RE GETTING WE NEED TO ASK OURSELVES, ARE WE GETTING FROM IT WHAT WE WERE HOPING? WE'RE ADDING IN THAT LAST REVIEW PART.

THEN WE'LL UPDATE IT AND PUT THE NEW DATE ON, PUT THE FREQUENCY AND I'LL UPLOAD IT.

THE NEXT TIME WE LOOK AT THAT POLICY IT WILL BE YOUR REVISED VERSION. HOW DID I DO?

>> YOU DID WELL.

>> I HEARD THERE WAS A QUESTION THAT WAS PUT FORTH.

I DON'T KNOW IF ANY OF YOU HAVE HAD A CHANCE TO DO THIS, BUT IT WAS WOW.

IF YOU GO TO BOARD DOCS AND YOU PULL UP OUR MEETINGS AND YOU SEARCH.

LIKE YOU WANT TO LOOK AT GRADING.

MAYBE HE'S ASKED ABOUT GRADING ON A FEW OCCASIONS.

IF YOU TYPE IN GRADING INTO THE SEARCH BAR UNDER THE MEETINGS, YOU WILL GET EVERY TIMESTAMP WHERE GRADING WAS MENTIONED NEARLY AD NAUSEAM.

YOU CAN CLICK ON THAT AND IT'LL TAKE YOU RIGHT TO THE VIDEO OF THE MEETING.

I LOVED WATCHING MYSELF? NO. [NOISE] BUT THEN WE CAN GO BACK TO THOSE DISCUSSIONS AND KNOW FROM THE TIMESTAMPS OR STAMPS WE PUT ON THE POLICY REVISIONS WE CAN HAVE THE OKAY.

THIS IS THE MEETING I'VE BEEN LOOKING FOR AND THEN SCAN THAT THROUGH IF PEOPLE WANT TO.

>> I DO HAVE A QUESTION ON THAT SEARCHING STUFF.

IS THERE ANYWAY, YOU CAN GET LIKE IN CHRONOLOGICAL ORDER? BECAUSE I JUST PUT IT IN GRADING AND I HAVE 2018, 2009, 2016, 2009, 2012, 2012, 2013 AD NAUSEAM.

IS THERE A WAY TO LIKE ADVANCE SEARCH WITH MULTIPLE PARAMETERS? LIKE I WANT GRADING IN 2022.

IF ANYBODY KNOWS.

>> IT'S A GOOD QUESTION AS FAR AS BOARD DOCS.

I KNOW THERE ARE.

I DON'T KNOW THE ANSWER TO THE QUESTION, BUT I KNOW THERE ARE SOME TUTORIALS IN THERE WITHIN BOARD DOCS.

I TRIED THIS BUT I SUSPECT THEY HAVE A SUPPORT TEAM.

I KNOW THEY HAD THE DIFFERENT CONFERENCES THERE HAD BEEN IN THE BOARD DOC PEOPLE AND I'M SURE THEY HAVE PEOPLE THAT COULD PROBABLY HELP DO THAT.

>> YOU SHOULD PROBABLY GO [INAUDIBLE]

>> [OVERLAPPING] CHRIS, SHE'S OVER THERE SHAKING HER HEAD.

>> YEAH, I DISAGREE BECAUSE SOMETIMES IT DOES. I DON'T KNOW IF IT DOESN'T.

I DON'T KNOW WHAT ALGORITHM IT USES AND HOW IT PUTS IT IN ORDER.

IS IT? YOU'RE RIGHT.

>> IT DOESN'T. [LAUGHTER]

>> [INAUDIBLE] WE JUST USE WEIRD ALGORITHMS. ARE THERE QUESTIONS ABOUT THE PROCESS? GO AHEAD.

>> [LAUGHTER] JUST WORRYING ABOUT TRACING THE HISTORY OF THE DOCUMENT.

IS THERE THIS FEATURE AT ALL THAT WOULD JUST SAY VERSION 1, VERSION 2? I KNOW SOME OF THEM HAVE LAST REVISED, SOMEWHERE OVER THERE [INAUDIBLE].

>> I AM NOT AWARE OF ANY ARCHIVE THAT WE HAVE THAT WAY.

IT'S SOMETHING WE CAN CONSIDER.

THE BIGGEST CHALLENGE WILL BE HOW MUCH OF THE REVISION AND HOW OFTEN? THE TECHIE PERSON IS SHAKING HIS HEAD YES BACK THERE.

[LAUGHTER] AS FAR AS CHANGING THAT AIR SOMETHING LIKE THAT VERSUS A MAJOR, LIKE ARE WE 11? WE'RE LOOKING AT A MAJOR REWRITE OF THE SECTION UNDER THERE AND CHANGE.

THOSE THINGS WILL BE IN ONE REGARD IT WOULD BE WITHIN MORE DOTS IF YOU SEARCH.

IF YOU GO BACK CHRONOLOGICALLY WHERE THEY ARE IN THE MEETING, THOSE ATTACHMENTS ARE NOT GOING TO CHANGE AFTER THE MEETINGS.

YOU'D BE ABLE TO BE GOING BACK TO LOOK AT WHAT WAS THIS DOCUMENT? WHAT WAS THE NEXT RENDITION THAT CAME IN THE NEXT MEETING? THEY WOULDN'T HAVE THE TIMESTAMP ESSENTIALLY AT THE BOTTOM OF THEM.

THAT'S, I THINK, ALL THAT'S THERE RIGHT NOW.

OTHER QUESTIONS? WE'VE GOT THE SURVEY FOR OE 12, THE SAFETY ONE THAT HAS BEEN PUT FORTH THERE.

WE'LL BE GETTING THE LINK [NOISE] TO THE R2.2, WHICH IS MATHEMATICS.

SAME PROCESS GOING THROUGH.

WE'VE GOT THE REPORT, WE CAN READ, AND THEN WE CAN MAKE COMMENTS.

THOSE WILL BE DUE BACK ON OCTOBER 7TH.

[00:55:02]

IT'S A WEEK FROM FRIDAY.

CHRIS WILL COMPILE COMMENTS.

WE'LL GET THOSE BACK TO READ BY OCTOBER 14TH, AND THEN WE WILL DISCUSS THEM AT OUR OCTOBER 25TH MEETING AND MAKE OUR CONSENSUS COMMENTS AND ADOPT THOSE REPORTS AND THEN THOSE WILL BE POSTED IN THE FINAL RESPONSE.

THEN AGAIN, LIKE I SAID, WE'LL COME BACK AT THE NOVEMBER MEETING AND WE'LL REVIEW THOSE POLICIES PER SE.

I THINK, DEPENDENT ON THE DEGREE THAT WE ARE LOOKING AT REVISING THEM, SUCH AS WITH OE 11, WE ALREADY HAVE A LONG LIST OF THINGS.

WE'RE HITTING THE MOST CRITICAL ONES HERE TONIGHT AND THEN WE'RE COMING BACK TO STUDY SESSION TO REALLY HASH OUT IN DEPTH SOME OF THE LESSER TIME CRITICAL THINGS WITH THINGS THAT CAN BE ADJUSTED WITHIN THE POLICY.

NEXT TIME MAYBE THE SAME THING WE CAN DO WITH SOME OF THESE OTHER POLICIES DEPENDING ON THE AMOUNT OF CHANGE WE'RE GOING TO DO.

CERTAINLY IF THERE'S QUESTIONS IN THE PROCESS, IF YOU HAVE TROUBLE WITH THE SURVEY, CHRIS IS PROBABLY THE GO-TO PERSON TO START WITH.

IF SHE CAN'T ANSWER THE QUESTION, SHE WILL FIND THE PERSON WHO CAN AND GET AN ANSWER.

SHE'S DONE THAT THROUGH ME SEVERAL TIMES, THANK YOU.

BUT THAT THE PROCESS WE'VE GOT IN PLACE FOR THOSE SO UNLESS THERE'S ANY OTHER QUESTIONS, WE'LL MOVE ON TO ITEM 4.02.

[MUSIC].

WE TALKED ABOUT REVISION AND CLOSING THE CIRCLE AND THAT IS WHAT WE'RE DOING UNDER ITEM 4.02, WHICH IS REVIEW POLICY.

WITHIN BOARD DOCS, THERE WAS A COPY ATTACHED OF THE, GIVE ME A SECOND AS I GET BACK TO THE RIGHT PAGE.

WE'VE GOT IN THERE THE OE 11, THE FACILITIES REPORT.

AGAIN THE GOAL FOR THIS EVENING WAS TO LOOK AT THAT SECTION 7 WHICH PRIMARILY HAD TO DO WITH THE AUTHORIZATION OF APPROVAL OF WORK OR THE CHANGES.

MARK, I DON'T KNOW IF YOU WANTED TO START WITH A REVIEW OF THE CHANGES YOU MADE AND THE REASONING BEHIND THAT.

>> I BELIEVE I MADE THE CHANGES BASED [NOISE] ON THE REQUEST OF THE BOARD WHERE WE ORIGINALLY WOULD REVIEW POLICY IN HERE.

[NOISE].

>> SORRY.

>> AROUND THE CHANGE OR AMOUNT THAT WE'RE TALKING ABOUT EARLIER.

IT SAYS HERE THOSE ARE MADE UP, ARBITRARY NUMBER WE PICKED AT THE TIME WE WROTE THE POLICY WHICH WE WROTE PRIOR TO OR THE MONITORING CRITERION ONE.

THAT WE WROTE PRIOR TO ACTUALLY SCHEDULED HIGH SCHOOL CONSTRUCTION PROJECT.

[NOISE] IT SEEMED LIKE ANOTHER THAT MADE SENSE AT THE TIME.

LIKE DR. [INAUDIBLE] SAID EARLIER, THAT'S NOT BASED ON ANYTHING OTHER THAN US PICKING A NUMBER THAT SEEMED TO MAKE SENSE.

PROBABLY WASN'T PARTICULARLY WELL THOUGHT OUT.

WE SHOULD HAVE GOT SOME INPUT FROM SOMEBODY ELSE WHO HAD BUILT A SCHOOL RECENTLY, THAT COULD HAVE TOLD US THAT THAT'S NOT APPROPRIATE AND RATHER THAT WOULD SLOW PROJECT AND THAT WOULD COST QUITE A BIT OF TIME AND MONEY IF YOU'RE TRYING TO EXECUTE THAT.

BASED ON BOARD INPUT FROM THE FIRST TIME WE WENT THROUGH THE POLICY, I MADE THAT PROVISION.

>> THE REVISIONS ARE IN THE GREEN ON PAGE 33, RIGHT? THAT'S THE ONE YOU'RE PROPOSING FOR US?

>> THAT'S CORRECT.

>> WE'RE TALKING PROPOSED UNIT INTERPRETATION.

ADJUSTED, MONITORING FOR INTERIOR.

>> DOES THAT MEAN THAT THE CHANGE ORDER LIMIT IS GOING TO BE OBSERVED THEN THE EXISTING CHANGE ORDER IS GOING TO BE OBSERVED GOING FORWARD OR NOT?

[01:00:08]

>> WOULD YOU MIND REPHRASING THAT QUESTION?

>> YES, I DON'T. FOR ONE THING I'M NOT REALLY ENTIRELY SURE WHICH OF THESE VERSIONS WE'RE LOOKING AT BECAUSE THERE'S THREE SEPARATE ONES HERE AND THE LAST ONE, I THINK IT'S PROBABLY, IS IT THE LAST.

>> IT'S THE TOP ONE UP HERE.

>> OKAY. I WANT TO ENSURE I UNDERSTAND THIS CORRECTLY, DOES THAT MEAN THAT THE CHANGE ORDER LIMIT IS WE'RE OBSERVING THE $50,000 FROM THIS POINT FORWARD OR AM I MISINTERPRETING THAT?

>> NO, I BELIEVE WE'RE PROPOSING TO REMOVE THAT.

>> IF I'M INTERPRETING THIS, WHAT WE'RE SAYING IS AS LONG AS WE'RE ON TIME WITH THE PROJECT AND WITHIN BUDGET, WE'RE GOING TO MOVE FORWARD WITH OUR EXISTING PROJECTS WITHOUT ANY MONEY LIMITATIONS, CORRECT?

>> THAT'S RIGHT.

>> WITHIN THE SCOPE.

>> WITHIN THE PROJECT, WITHIN THE SCOPE.

NOW LET ME ASK, WAS CFG AWARE OF THE SCOPE? AS PART OF THE SCOPE OF THE WORK DID THEY SEE THE MONITORING FOOTSTEP WE SEE AS FAR AS THE CONTRACT THAT WHAT HE DID WITH CSG, WERE THEY AWARE THAT THERE WAS A $50,000 LEMON ON CHANGE ORDERS?

>> THE $50,000 CHANGE ORDER NUMBER, THE ONLY PLACE IT APPEARS WAS IN THIS MONITORING REPORT.

>> CSG HAS NEVER SEEN THIS POLICY?

>> NO, AND THAT'S WHY I SAID WE PROBABLY SHOULD HAVE HAD A CONVERSATION WITH THEM UPFRONT.

BUT WE HAD A CONTRACT WITH THEM YET BECAUSE WE HAVEN'T ALLOCATED THE PROJECT.

>> WHAT I'M SAYING IS THIS.

WHEN THEY BID THIS THEY'D NEVER SEEN THAT NUMBER SO THEY DIDN'T EVER HAVE TO CONSIDER WORKING WITHIN THOSE PARAMETERS, CORRECT?

>> CORRECT. THEY WOULDN'T HAVE DONE IT.

>> THEY'RE THE EXPERTS. THEY WOULD HAVE PROBABLY SAID, HEY, WE CAN'T WORK WITHIN THAT PARAMETER, CORRECT?

>> FOR SURE.

>> FOR FOLKS THAT MAYBE HAVEN'T FOLLOWED ALL THE WAY ALONG, IT'S NOT EVEN IN THE POLICY, IT'S ACTUALLY IN WHAT WE SAID WE ARE GOING TO MEASURE, TO PROVE WE WERE BEING RESPONSIBLE WITH THE BONDS.

THE MANAGEMENT MADE IT OUT AS A BAD INDICATOR.

>> LOOKING FORWARD, WE'RE GETTING TO THE END OF THE PROJECT, RIGHT? MONEY IS GETTING A LITTLE BIT TIGHTER.

WE MADE SOME PROMISES.

WE'LL TAKE A LOOK AT CASCADIA, WE ARE GOING TO TAKE A LOOK AT CUSTARD.

THERE ARE SOME OTHER PARTS OF THIS BOND PROJECT, RIGHT? ARE WE FORECASTING THAT WE'RE GOING TO BE ABLE TO COMPLETE THAT WITHIN BUDGET AND STILL COMPLETE THE HIGH SCHOOL?

>> YES. YOU'VE ACTUALLY FORESHADOWED MY REPORT.

>> I APOLOGIZE FOR THAT. [LAUGHTER]

>> IT WILL SAVE SOME TIME ON THE BOND UPDATE.

WE ACTUALLY SPENT A GOOD PORTION OF TODAY AND WE BEING TEN MONTHS STAFF.

KEN KIRKIN AND HARDING HANSEN FROM CSG.

WE SPENT A LOT OF TODAY ACTUALLY GOING THROUGH THE BUDGET IN GREAT DETAIL.

TIGHTENING THINGS UP, SHIFTING LINE ITEMS THAT WE'RE GOING TO SPEND OR OVERSPEND.

ECONOMIC JUSTICE TO MAKE SURE AS WE GET TOWARDS THE END OF THE PROJECT WE CAN ACTUALLY DELIVER ON EVERYTHING THAT NEEDS TO BE DONE AND ONE OF THE AREAS THAT WE TALKED ABOUT SPECIFICALLY IS THE [INAUDIBLE] $2 MILLION YOU'RE WORKING ON.

WE'VE GOT $3.5 MILLION WORTH OF WORK THAT NEEDS TO BE DONE.

THE QUESTION IS, OKAY, HOW ARE YOU GOING TO DO THAT? WE HAD THE FUNDS TO BE ABLE TO DO THAT.

I HAD TO COMPLETE ALL THE OTHER PROJECTS.

AND YES, WE ARE.

AS THE RESULT OF TODAY'S RECONCILIATION WORK, WE FEEL PRETTY CONFIDENT.

VERY CONFIDENT THAT WE'RE ACTUALLY GOING TO BE ABLE TO DELIVER EVERYTHING AS PROMISED.

>> TO PUT IT VERY BLONDLY AND I APOLOGIZE FOR THIS, FOR PUTTING IT BLONDLY.

WHAT WE'RE SAYING IS WHAT WE'RE CONSIDERING IS SAYING.

OKAY, WE'RE GOING TO HAND IT OVER TO YOU TO STAY WITHIN THE TIME FRAME, STAY WITHIN BUDGET TO COMPLETE THE PROJECTS IN THE FUTURE WITHOUT ANY MONEY LIMITATIONS ON CHANGE OF COURSE, CORRECT?

[01:05:07]

>> YEAH, LIMITATION BASICALLY IS THE PROJECT BUDGET.

WE CAN'T OVERSPEND THE PROJECT, WHICH IS BIG. THAT'S THE BOTTOM LINE.

>> I JUST WANTED ALL THE BOARD TO UNDERSTAND WHAT WE'RE LOOKING AT AS FAR AS SAYING, WE'RE NOT PUTTING ANY MONEY LIMITATIONS ON ANYTHING.

CHANGE ORDERS COME UP AND YOU KNOW AS WELL BEING A PART OF THIS PROJECT.

SOME OF THESE CHANGE ORDERS CAN GET QUITE EXPENSIVE, MAYBE GETTING INTO MILLIONS, RIGHT? WITH THE STRUCTURE AND ALL THAT KIND OF STUFF.

>> I GUESS THE ONLY OBJECTION, I APPRECIATE BLOND.

THE ONLY THING I'D SAY IS THAT THE PARAMETER IS THAT WE CAN'T EXCEED THE PROGRAM BUDGET.

THE BOTTOM LINE.

>> RIGHT ALWAYS KEEP IN MIND THAT NUMBER.

>> YOU'LL REPORT BACK TO THE BOARD IF YOU FEEL LIKE WE'RE APPROACHING ON THAT NUMBER.

>> OF COURSE. YEAH.

>> AS YOU KNOW, SITTING IN ON THE BOND OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE MEETINGS.

THEY SCRUTINIZE THE BUDGET VERY CAREFULLY.

APPARENTLY INCOME ACCOUNTING [INAUDIBLE]

>> YEAH. I WILL ASSURE THE REST OF THE BOARD THAT THAT PART IS VERY WELL SCRUTINIZED.

>> THERE'S A COUPLE OF THINGS WITH THAT THOUGH, IS LIKE WITH ANY INDICATOR ON HERE, WE SEE THEM AT WHATEVER PERIOD WE SEE THAT EVERY TWO YEARS OR ONE YEAR, WHATEVER, AND IT'S IN COMPLIANCE OR NON-COMPLIANCE.

THERE'S NOTHING IN HERE THAT SAYS YOU NEED TO TELL US BEFORE THIS REPORT COMES UP.

IT COULD BE BASED STRICTLY ON WHAT THE REPORT SAYS THAT WE WOULD NOT KNOW THAT WE WERE OVER BUDGET ON SOMETHING UNTIL THE NEXT TIME THE REPORT WAS LOOKED AT, WHICH WAS WAY TOO LATE.

THE OTHER THING IS, I TOTALLY UNDERSTAND THAT 50,000 WAS WAY TOO LOW.

BUT I MEAN, THE VOTERS VOTE IN A BOND.

THAT IS THE LIMIT BY LAW.

THIS IS JUST SAYING WHAT THE LAW IS.

I MEAN, IT DOESN'T GIVE ANY OVERSIGHT TO THE BOARD.

I THINK WE DO STILL NEED A NUMBER OR WE NEED A PERCENTAGE OR WE NEED SOMETHING.

BUT TO JUST SAY LIKE YOU'LL FIND OUT THE NEXT TIME YOU SEE THE REPORT.

I DON'T THINK THAT'S A GOOD INDICATOR.

>> WELL, YOU ACTUALLY RECEIVE A REPORT MONTHLY OF THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.

WHEN DID YOU GET THE MONTHLY FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND YOU GET THE CAPITAL PROJECTS REPORT.

THAT INFORMATION IS IN THERE.

>> MAYBE ON THAT ONE THOUGH AS FAR AS LIKE GETTING THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS THAT I CAN SEE ALL THE CHECKS WERE TAKEN IN FRONT OF THIS BUDGET AND WE PAID OUT THAT MUCH AND THEN WE'VE GOT A DASHBOARD OVER HERE, BUT THEY'RE NOT GOING TO BOND OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE, SO I DON'T KNOW EXACTLY HOW MUCH IS LEFT IN THE BUCKET TO PAY.

I GUESS I LIKE BLUNT AND SO I WANT THAT BLUNT.

WE'RE ONLY 20% THROUGH THIS PROJECT.

WE'VE ONLY SPENT 30% OF THE MONEY AND NOT TALKING THIS PROJECT, BUT IN THE FUTURE TYPE OF PROJECT, WE'RE 20% IS SPENDING 30%, WE'VE GOT TO CHANGE ALREADY.

I'M JUST GOING TO TOTALLY THROW THINGS OUT OF WHACK ACCORDING TO THIS POLICY. YOU DON'T HAVE TO TELL ME.

I HAVE TO BE ABLE TO FIGURE THAT OUT ON MY OWN, READING ALL THE DOCUMENTS AND I HONESTLY I DON'T HAVE THE TRAINING KNOW-HOW CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT SKILLS TO MAYBE GET THAT.

I WOULD NEED THAT AS A VOLUNTEER BOARD MEMBER, I WOULD NEED YOU TO TELL ME BLUNTLY, THIS ONE IS WAY OUT OF WHACK AND YOU GUYS NEED TO KNOW ABOUT IT.

>> TWO THINGS, I'LL ANSWER THAT IN TWO DIFFERENT PARTS.

WHEN WE STARTED THE PROJECT WAY BACK IN THE EARLY STAGES OF GETTING THE BOND OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE UP AND RUNNING, GETTING THE CONTRACTORS HIRED IN THE VERY BEGINNING STAGES OF THE PROJECT.

THE BOND OVERSIGHTS' BIGGEST CONCERN, THEIR BIGGEST WORRY THE GUYS ARE IN THE TRAINS WAS OUR SPEED, ABILITY TO ANSWER QUESTIONS AND GIVE THEM DIRECTIVES AND NOT SLOW THE PROJECT DOWN.

THESE ARE THE PEOPLE THAT ARE WATCHING THIS AND THEIR BIGGEST ISSUE WAS HOW FAST YOU CAN PROVIDE THE ANSWERS TO GIVE YOU THE PROJECT AND NOT HOW MUCH OFFER TO UNDERSTAND.

THE OTHER PIECE OF THAT TOO, I GUESS, IS THE SUPERINTENDENT WORKS FOR YOU?

[01:10:04]

HER JOB IS TO KEEP YOU INFORMED THAT APPRISED OF WHAT'S HAPPENING, WHAT'S GOING ON.

YOU'RE NOT HAPPY WITH THE INFORMATION YOU'RE GETTING.

YOU GUYS HAVE TO RECOURSE THERE.

IT'S WHETHER IT'S IN A POLICY OR NOT.

IF YOU'RE NOT HAVING THAT COMMUNICATION AND THAT DIALOGUE I GUESS THERE'S BIGGER ISSUES [OVERLAPPING] IN YOUR SCENARIO WE'RE NOT SHARING THAT INFORMATION.

WE'VE GOT BIGGER ISSUES THAN WHAT'S [INAUDIBLE].

>> [INAUDIBLE] YOU KNOW THE BOARD.

I WOULD SAY THAT, I UNDERSTAND THERE'S AN OBSTACLE WHEN IT COMES TO APPROVAL OF X AMOUNT OF MONIES FOR A CHANGE ORDER.

HOWEVER, THERE'S A LOT OF ROADBLOCKS WHEN YOU'RE DEALING WITH A PROJECT OF THIS SIZE.

AS YOU WELL KNOW, THERE'S A CHANGEOVER FOR THE PLACE, THERE HAS TO BE AN RFI.

AN RFI TAKES TIME.

YOU KNOW, YOU HAVE TO REVIEW THE INFORMATION AND A LOT OF TIMES THAT INCLUDES BUYING EXTRA [INAUDIBLE] PIECES.

THERE'S LEAD TIMES OR THOSE PARTS SO IN ALL FAIRNESS TO THE BOARD THAT'S NOT YOUR ONLY LOCALIZED AS TO A TIME LIMITATION ON COMPLETING THE PROJECT ON TIME.

THERE IS A LEAD TIMES FOR PARTS AND PIECES AND ALL THE OTHER STUFF THAT GOES WITH THE PROJECT.

>> ABSOLUTELY.

>> [INAUDIBLE] SICK AND YOU DON'T THINK YOU CAN CALL AN EMERGENCY MEETING WITHIN 24 HOURS.

I THINK, ESPECIALLY WITH THE ABILITY TO ZOOM, WE'LL BE ABLE TO RESOLVE ANY PROBLEMS THAT YOU BROUGHT TO US IN A TIMELY MANNER.

>> I THINK ONE OF THE OTHER THINGS THAT WAS SET UP IN INITIAL STAGES OF THIS RANDOM WITH THIS NUMBER.

BUT THE PART OF THE OTHER STANDING WITH THOSE CHANGE ORDERS IS THE SCRUTINY THAT THE BOND OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE WAS PUTTING ON THOSE CHANGE ORDERS AND REALISTICALLY SAID, IF YOU BRING SOMETHING TO ME AND ASKED ME, IS THIS THE BEST WAY TO SAY THE DOG OR CAT? I CAN TELL YOU, YES, NO, AND OTHERWISE, BUT IF YOU ASK ME, IS THIS THE RIGHT CONSTRUCTION MATERIAL, I WOULD MUCH RATHER HAVE THOSE PEOPLE ON BOND OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE MAKING THOSE DECISIONS BECAUSE [INAUDIBLE] BECAUSE WHEN I WENT AND VISITED THE BUILDING WITH HIM, IT'S LIKE HE'S ASKING AND USING ALL THESE ACRONYMS AND I'M LIKE I HAVE NO IDEA WHAT YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT JUST TO GIVE ME UP TO SPEED WOULD TAKE QUITE AWHILE.

AGAIN, KUDOS TO OUR BOND OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE BECAUSE THEY HAVE BEEN DOING SCRUTINIZE THESE THINGS BEYOND MY CERTAINLY ABILITY TO DO SUCH.

BUT I THINK PART OF IT IS DELEGATING OUT THAT PROCESS AND THAT IS A PART OF THE THOUGHT PROCESS IN THE ORIGINAL SETTING UP OF THINGS, AS OPPOSED TO HAVING ALL THAT STUFF COME TO THE BOARD WHICH THEN WE HAVE TO TRY AND GET UP TO SPEED ON IT AND IN THE MIDST OF WHEREVER WE WERE.

>> A SUGGESTION. I THINK WE ALL THINK THAT THE BOND OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE IS WORTH ITS WEIGHT IN GOLD.

>> I TOTALLY AGREE.

>> WHAT IF WE PUT IN THE POLICY THAT WE HAVE THAT OUR POLICY IS FOR MAJOR CONSTRUCTION WE HAVE A BOND OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE.

WE HAD ONE WITH THIS BOND BECAUSE IT WAS A PROMISE MADE TO VOTERS AND WE NEEDED IT AND IT WAS GOOD.

WHAT IF WE PUT IT AS POLICY THAT WE WOULD ALWAYS HAVE ONE.

THEN THE SECOND OTHER THING, I DON'T NECESSARILY FEEL LIKE I NEED TO APPROVE EVERY CHANGE ORDER, BUT IF WE WROTE IT IN 7.1 AND 7.

2 THAT WE ARE NOTIFIED OF CHANGE ORDERS ABOVE X DOLLAR AMOUNT DOESN'T HAVE ANY 50 WHATEVER THEY'RE CALLED OUT RATHER THAN HOW TO READ THE FINANCIAL DOCUMENTS TO KNOW WHERE WE ARE IN CONSTRUCTION HAS GOT EQUAL.

TWO DIFFERENT THINGS, NOTIFIED AS OPPOSED TO IMPROVE AND MUST HAVE A BOND OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE.

>> BUT ARE WE ALLOWED TO DO THAT?

>> WHICH PART?

>> NOTIFY AS OPPOSED TO APPROVED IF WE ARE ELECTED OFFICIALS AND WE'RE SUPPOSED TO APPROVE THESE THINGS, THEN I MEAN, ULTIMATELY IT LANDS IN OUR ARMS AGAIN SO IF THERE IS A PROBLEM.

>> I'M SORRY. I INTERRUPTED YOU.

>> IT'S OKAY. GO AHEAD.

>> THE BOARD AT THE TIME, APPROVED WHAT THE ASK AND THE BOND WOULD BE AND THEN THE VOTERS APPROVED WITH THE BOND AND PAST THAT I THINK ANY THINGS THAT WE SAY WE HAVE TO APPROVE OF ARE WRITTEN INTO OUR POLICY.

WE HAD IN OUR POLICY THAT WE APPROVED THE CHANGE ORDERS OF 50,000 OR MORE WHICH WASN'T WORKING IF WE REWRITE THE POLICY THAT INSTEAD OF APPROVING WERE NOTIFIED, THEN WE'RE JUST CHANGING THE COMMUNICATION STRUCTURE.

I THINK AS FAR AS THE APPROVAL OF HOW MUCH MONEY WILL BE SPENT ON THE HIGH SCHOOL, THE VOTERS DID THAT NOT US.

WE ASKED THEM TO DO IT AND THEY SAID YES [INAUDIBLE].

>> IF WE ARE NOTIFIED IN A TIMELY MANNER,

[01:15:03]

THEN IF WE GO WELL, THAT DOESN'T LOOK OR WE CAN TIME GET A HOLD OF THE BOND OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE TO SAY EXPLAIN THIS.

WAS THIS A GOOD BAD OR OTHERWISE, THEY'RE NOT AFRAID TO TELL US GOOD, BAD, OR OTHERWISE.

>> NOW KEEP IN MIND, WE ARE INFORMED, YOU DON'T GET EVERY SO OFTEN THE BOND OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE MEETS WITH BOARD MEMBERS AND GIVES A MONTHLY REPORT OF WHERE WE STAND AND KUDOS TO THEM.

THEY'RE DOING A GREAT JOB.

IT'S GREATER THAN WE HAVE IN PLACE.

I AGREE WITH YOU AND LINDA THAT MOVING FORWARD, MAYBE THAT SHOULD BE PART OF THE PROCESS, IS WE SECURE THAT MOVING FORWARD FOR BIG PROJECTS, X AMOUNT OF DOLLARS OR WHATEVER, THAT WE DO HAVE A BOND OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE IN CHARGE.

>> WELL, AND IF YOU READ PARAGRAPH 2, IT HAS IT IN THERE.

WE UNDERSTAND THIS COMPONENT FOR ME THAT'S THE SUPERINTENDENT FROM A PRIMITIVE AND SUBSTANTIAL CHANGE ORDERS UNLESS SUCH CHANGE ORDER SECOND HAVE BEEN FULLY VETTED THROUGH A PROCESS THAT HAS BEEN PRE-APPROVED.

IF THE SCHOOL BOARD SAYING WE'RE GOING TO HAVE A BOND OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE, THAT'S WHO'S GOING TO BE IN CHARGE OF FULLY VETTING IT AND I SAT AND WATCHED THAT MEETING AND THEY DO.

THEN IN THE EVENT THAT CUMULATIVE COST OF CHANGE ORDERS REACHES 80% OF THE AMOUNT OF OWNER'S CONTINGENCY BUDGET.

RIGHT THERE THAT'S BOTH OF THOSE CASES.

>> I WOULD ALSO STATE THAT SOMEWHERE IN THERE WE SHOULD HAVE PROBABLY SOMETHING THAT SAYS THE FACT THAT THE MONITORING PORCH SHOULD BE PART OF THE SCOPE WHEN WE CONTRACT, FOR INSTANCE, CISG, TO DO A PROJECT, THEY SHOULD BE AWARE OF WHAT THE BOARD'S PARAMETERS ARE.

THAT SHOULD BE PART OF THEIR SOCIAL WORK SO THAT THEY CAN BID THE JOB WITHIN OUR PARAMETERS AND NOT VIOLATE BECAUSE BASICALLY WE DID VIOLATE THE $50,000 RULE.

AGAIN, THE $50,000 WAS OUR REASONABLE INTERPRETATION.

IT'S NOT IN YOUR POLICY.

YOUR POLICY DIDN'T SAY IT SET $50,000, OUR REASONABLE INTERPRETATION, IT SAID $50,000.

>> IF WE GO BACK TO OUR POLICY ON OE-11 ON FACILITIES, BASICALLY 7 SAYS, THE SUPERINTENDENT MAY NOT AUTHORIZE CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULES AND CHANGE ORDERS THAT INSIGNIFICANTLY INCREASE THE COST OR REDUCE QUALITY.

[NOISE] 7.1 AND 7.2 WERE THE INDICATORS THAT WERE PUT FORWARD BY THE EXACT TEAM.

JUST AGAIN, AS FAR AS CLARIFICATION, THOSE WERE THE BOARD'S POLICY HAPPENS WITH THEY PUT IT FORWARD.

THIS IS OUR INTERPRETATION OF THAT AT THE TIME, AND IN THAT TIME I DIDN'T SEE, AGAIN, WE WEREN'T IN THE MIDDLE OF BUILDING PROJECT AND SO WE WERE PICKING A NUMBER OUT OF VIRTUAL THIN AIR.

>> DON'T GET ME WRONG. THIS IS GOING TO BE AN ARBITRARY NUMBER.

WE ALL KNOW THAT THAT WASN'T A REALISTIC NUMBER.

COME ON, REALLY.

[LAUGHTER] I DON'T THINK WE'RE GOING TO SPEND A LOT OF TIME ON WORRYING ABOUT THAT NUMBERS.

>> I THINK IF I'M HERE AND I LIKE MORE IN THESE BOTH SUGGESTIONS OF CLARIFYING THE REQUIREMENT FOR THE BOND OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE ON MAJOR PROJECTS.

IF WE ADD 7.2, A PHYSICAL COMPONENT, CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULES WILL BE COMMUNICATED AND WE'RE BEING FORCED WITH SUBSTANTIAL CHANGES TO PROJECT BUDGETS AND/OR SCHEDULES.

RIGHT NOW, THERE'S A REQUIREMENT THAT THAT TAKES PLACE.

DOES THAT GET US WHERE WE NEED TO BE?

>> IT GETS ME READY.

>> THEY ANSWER, I THINK WHAT YOUR QUESTION WAS REALLY PETTY, THAT WHEN YOU IMPROVE THE BOUNDARIES, ALL THE CAPITAL PROJECT INFORMATION AND EXPENDITURES ARE IN THERE AS WELL.

>> THAT WAS ACTUALLY A QUESTION I HAD ABOUT, IS THERE A LIMIT ON VOUCHERS SINCE, ARE WE APPROVING VOUCHERS OR ARE WE APPROVING CHECKS THAT HAVE ALREADY BEEN THERE, OR WE ARE APPROVING WARRANTS?

>> WARRANTS.

>> IS THERE A LIMIT ON THE AMOUNT [NOISE] OF WARRANTS THAT WE CAN APPROVE? BECAUSE I'M LOOKING THROUGH THE STATE AUDITOR'S DESCRIPTION OF HOW WARRANTS AND VOUCHERS ARE DONE, IT SEEMS LIKE THERE ARE LIMITS UNLESS YOUR BOARD ADOPTS

[01:20:03]

A CERTAIN APPROACH WHICH ALLOWS THAT, BUT THEN THERE ARE BONDING REQUIREMENTS AND I DON'T REMEMBER WHAT ELSE.

THE NUMBER $50,000, PERHAPS IN THOSE REGULATIONS AND THAT'S WHY I'M WONDERING, THAT'S WHERE THAT NUMBER CAME FROM.

>> NO. WHAT HAPPENS, WE CANNOT APPROVE MORE THAN WE HAVE WITHOUT PUTTING THE DISTRICT INTO WHAT THEY CALL BINDING CONDITIONS.

IF WE'RE GETTING TO THE POINT WHERE WE'RE ACTUALLY ISSUING INTERESTS FAIR AND WARRANTS, WHICH BASICALLY MEANS WE'RE HAVING CHECKS BUT WE DON'T HAVE THE MONEY IN CASH, THEN EVERYBODY IN THE STATE IS GOING TO KNOW ABOUT IT.

THAT BASICALLY PUTS US ONE STEP FROM INSOLVENCY.

THE ESD WILL BE TAKING OVER BASED ON THOSE PIS CORRECTION.

THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN CHECK AND WARRANT, A WARRANT IS A PROMISSORY NOTE.

IF WE DON'T HAVE THE MONEY TO PAY IT IN TERMS OF DOING THE INTERESTS BEARING WARRANT, WE START ACCRUING INTEREST AND ALL.

BASICALLY THE WARRANTS WILL BE ISSUED UNTIL WE'RE ABLE TO ACTUALLY SATISFY THE OBLIGATION.

UNLESS THIS IS HOW MUCH MONEY WE HAVE.

>> I GUESS ANOTHER QUESTION THAT I HAVE IS THAT, ALL THE WAY BACK I LOOK AT THIS AND I ASKED TO SEE THE CONTRACT THAT WE HAVE WITH THE PROJECT MANAGER AND THERE WERE ATTACHED TO THIS TOO THAT LIKE AN EXHIBIT OR WHATEVER.

I CAN SWEAR THAT THE CHANGE ORDER LIMIT IS IN THERE.

IS THAT PART OF THE CONTRACT?

>> ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT THE CONTRACT WITH THE GC/CM OR ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT THE CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT ONLY?

>> THE CSG.

>> THE CSG CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT COMPANY?

>> I WOULD HAVE TO GO AND LOOK AND I DON'T RECALL OF A CHANGE OR A LIMIT IN THE AGREEMENT.

I HAVE TO GO AND LOOK AT THEM.

>> THAT'S ALL THE ATTACHMENTS, ONE OF THE EXHIBITS A OR B, AND I CAN'T REMEMBER WHICH ONE, BUT WE HAVE THIS ONE HERE, MY APOLOGIES IF IT'S NOT, BUT THAT'S WHY I'M QUESTIONING THIS IS BECAUSE MY MEMORY IS TELLING SOMETHING DIFFERENT, BUT I WILL GO AND CHECK.

>> OTHER QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS REGARDING REVISIONS TO OE-12, SECTION 7?

>> OE-11.

>> OE-11. THANK YOU.

SO MUCH TO THINK ABOUT TODAY.

>> WE'VE TALKED ABOUT 7.1 AND 7.2.

>> CORRECT.

>> YOUR FINAL DRAFT THAT I READ INCLUDED SOME OTHER ITEMS RIGHT UP BY DIFFERENT BOARD MEMBERS.

>> CORRECT.

>> ONE WAS WORK ORDERS IN PROCESS, THEY HIT BOTH, AND STUFF LIKE.

MY QUESTION IS, DO WE HAVE A TIMESTAMP AS FAR AS GETTING THESE THINGS DONE? THE NEXT REVISION IS GOING TO BE IN 2024, WHICH IS QUITE SOME TIME OFF.

MY QUESTION IS, SOMEBODY HAD COMMENTS, WHEN WILL THEY BE ADDRESSED? WHO ARE THEY ASSIGNED TO? WHO'S RESPONSIBLE FOR GETTING SOME OF THESE THINGS DONE?

>> ULTIMATELY, THAT GOES BACK TO THE SUPERINTENDENT BECAUSE AGAIN, SHE'S OUR ONLY EMPLOYEE.

EVERYTHING THAT WE DECLARE GOES BACK TO HER AND THEN SHE DELEGATES IT TO HER TEAM AND SHE SEES THAT.

THAT'S ONE OF THE THINGS THAT WE WERE LOOKING TO STREAMLINE THE PROCESSES SO THAT WE CAN VIEW THOSE IN ESSENCE MORE FREQUENTLY AND DOING IT ON AN ANNUAL BASIS OR BI-ANNUAL BASIS.

AGAIN, PART OF THAT WAS 7.1 WITH OE-11.

THERE WERE A LOT OF THINGS THAT WE DID SUGGEST ADJUSTING, CHANGING, CORRECTING, BLAH-BLAH-BLAH.

THAT'S COMING BACK UP AT JANUARY'S DAY SESSION TENTATIVELY TO GO OVER AND CLARIFY AND PROBABLY PRIORITIZE SOME OF THOSE THINGS BECAUSE THERE WERE A LOT OF POTENTIAL CHANGES TO THE POLICY IN WHAT WE WERE EXPECTING.

>> FOR THIS PARTICULAR MEETING, MARK AND I MET.

HE REVISED THESE PARTICULAR TWO BECAUSE WHAT I HEARD AT THE LAST MEETING WAS WE DIDN'T WANT THAT NUMBER TO HOLD UP THE PROJECT SO WE ADDRESSED THOSE IN JANUARY.

WE WILL GET A REVIEW OF THAT.

THEN WE WILL BE LOOKING AT THAT POLICY.

IS IT WRITTEN THE WAY WE WANT? HOW FREQUENTLY DO WE WANT TO REVIEW IT?

[01:25:02]

THEN WE'LL BE FINALIZING THINGS THERE.

>> THAT'S A BIG TEAM.

>> IF I'M HEARING THINGS CORRECTLY AND TO JUST CLARIFY, WE'RE TRYING TO BRING THE DISCUSSION TOGETHER, IT SOUNDS LIKE MARK HAS DIRECTION THAT WE CAN TAKE ONBOARD IF WE'RE COMFORTABLE WITH, TO BASICALLY MAKE A FEW MORE TWEAKS TO THAT SECTION 7 OF OE-11 AND THEN POTENTIALLY BRINGING BACK AT OUR NEXT MEETING TO FINALIZE OR HOPEFULLY FINALIZE.

IS THAT WHAT EVERYBODY IS FEELING OR WHERE ARE WE?

>> I'LL FEEL MORE COMFORTABLE IF WE DID TAKE A LOOK ON IT BECAUSE I SAID WHAT I WANTED AND MARK SAID PRETTY MUCH WHAT I WANTED.

[LAUGHTER] BUT I DON'T KNOW IF YOU GUYS ALL LIKE.

[NOISE] I THINK WE SHOULD LOOK ON THOSE.

>> OKAY. DO YOU WANT TO PUT FORTH A MOTION TO THAT EFFECT?

>> I'M GOING TO PUT FORWARD AS TWO SEPARATE ONES.

>> OKAY.

>> I WOULD LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION THAT WITHIN OE-11, WE CODIFY THAT FOR BOND PROJECTS, WE HAVE A BOND OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE.

>> IT'S BEEN MOVED IN FOR CAPITAL BOND PROJECTS THEN WE CODIFY THAT WE'RE GOING TO HAVE A BOND OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE. ANY DISCUSSION?

>> WELL, ARE THE RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE BUSINESS THAT WE OWN UP LATER WHERE I'LL SAY IT'S RESPONSIBILITIES OF AN OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE OR ENDED UP CODIFIED RIGHT NOW? BUT YOU HAVE IT ASSIGNED.

>> THE BOND OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE THAT WE HAVE RIGHT NOW, THEY ARE CLARIFIED OF WHAT THEY ARE.

IT WOULD BE A BOND OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE IN THE SAME FASHION OF WHAT WE HAVE NOW.

[OVERLAPPING] VOLUNTEER COMMITTEE MEMBERS FROM THE COMMUNITY WITHOUT CONFLICTS OF INTEREST.

>> I JUST WANT TO KNOW, HOW MUCH GOES INTO THIS POLICY THAT WE HAVE TO HAVE SPELLED OUT? THAT'S WHAT I WAS WONDERING.

>> THAT COULD BE LIKE THE ATTACHMENT TOO.

>> WELL, I'M TRYING TO FIND IT AND I'M NOT FINDING IT IN HERE REAL QUICK, AND WE MAY NEED TO LOOK AT THAT BECAUSE THERE ARE SOME OUTLINES IN THE COHERENT AND GOVERNANCE MODEL AS FAR AS COMMITTEES AND HOW THEY ARE SET OUT AND REPORTING AND DIFFERENT THINGS THERE.

CERTAINLY WE CAN MAKE TWEAKS TO THAT, BUT THERE ARE SOME THEY'RE ALWAYS UP.

THERE ARE A FAIR NUMBER OF THINGS THAT WE DID SET UP WITH THE BOND OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE.

AGAIN, I DON'T HAVE THEM ON THE TIP OF MY TONGUE.

>> THIS IS IN GC-5, I THINK.

ALTHOUGH THAT MIGHT NOT BE UPDATED ON OUR WEBSITE BECAUSE THERE'S THE BOND TASKFORCE.

BOND OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE.

IT'S GC-5.B SAYS WHAT THE BOND OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE IS AUTHORIZED TO DO, WHAT THEIR PURPOSE AND AUTHORITY IS, THEIR OPERATING GUIDELINES, CONFLICTS OF INTERESTS, DISTRICT REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE, DURATION OF THE COMMITTEE AND OPPORTUNITY FOR REVIEW.

>> THANKS [INAUDIBLE].

CERTAINLY THE CURRENT BOND OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE HAS SET THE BAR HIGH.

>> THEY HAVE TO COME BACK. [LAUGHTER]

>> ONCE WE PASS THE BALL.

>> THAT'S IT. ANY OTHER DISCUSSION? THEN WE'LL GO AHEAD AND VOTE ON THE MOTION TO INCLUDE CODE TO PUT IT INTO OUR POLICY THAT ANY CAPITAL BONDS PROJECT WILL HAVE A BOND OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE.

ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SIGNIFY BY SAYING AYE.

>> ALL OPPOSED? THAT PASSES. YOUR SECOND MOTION.

>> SECOND MOTION I'D LIKE TO MAKE IS THAT, SOMETHING JUST OCCURRED TO ME.

IT DOESN'T MATTER THE SIZE OF THE CAPITAL PROJECTS.

>> YOU'LL PAY CAPITAL BONDS AGAINST ALL, [OVERLAPPING].

>> A SMALL TOKEN.

>> ANYTHING THAT PROVES BY.

IT MIGHT BE SOMETHING SMALL, BUT I THINK USUALLY HAVE TO LAUNCH IT.

THE SECOND MOTION I WOULD LIKE TO MAKE IS THAT FOR 7.1 AND 7.2 IN OE 11, THAT WE ADD VERBIAGE TO NOTIFY THE BOND OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE WHEN THE BUDGET FOR THE SCHEDULE DEVIATES FROM THE PLAN.

[01:30:01]

>>YOU WANT AN IMPORTANT NOTIFICATION?

>> IS THAT WHAT I SAID?

>> YOU SAID IMPORTANT NOTIFICATION.

>> SORRY, BOARD NOTIFICATION.

>>I'M SORRY. IF I READ THAT, IS THAT ALREADY IN THERE?

>> IT SAYS SCHEDULE, BUT IT DOESN'T SAY BUDGET.

>> IT DOESN'T SAY NOTIFICATION WHEN IT HAPPENS.

>> SAYS CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS WILL BE COMPLETED WITHIN THE FUNDS ALLOCATED.

IN ADDITION, CONSTRUCTION PROGRESS, WHAT WE'VE COMPLETED WITHIN DISTRICT BID SPECIFICATIONS, INCLUDING TIME FRAME AND BUDGET.

>> IT DOESN'T ADDRESS THE CHANGE, WHICH IS THAT ANYWAY, WAY I WAS UNDERSTANDING THAT CONVERSATION.

SO 7.2 IS SPECIFICALLY TO THE CHANGES IN BUDGET OR SCHEDULE, IT DOESN'T SAY BUDGET.

>> I SEE WHAT YOU'RE SAYING, PROJECT SCHEDULES, IT DOESN'T SAY BUDGETS, 7.1 SAYS BUDGET. I'M WITH YOU.

>> BASICALLY WE JUST NEED TO ADD CHANGES TO SECTION 7.2.

>> YOU ARE GOING TO RESTATE MY MOTION?

>> I CAN RESTATE IT FOR YOU.

>> THANK YOU.

>> WE HAVE A MOTION TO ADD TO THE INTERPRETATION ON SECTION 7.2 THAT THE BOARD WOULD BE NOTIFIED OF NOT ONLY SCHEDULE CHANGES BUT BUDGET CHANGES.

AGAIN, ANY DISCUSSION? SEEING NONE, WE'LL GO AHEAD AND VOTE ALL THOSE IN FAVOR OF THE BOARD BE NOTIFIED OF BUDGETARY CHANGES, SIGNIFY BY SAYING, AYE.

>> NAY. MAY I ASK YOU A CLARIFYING QUESTION, I'LL GIVE SOME OF US WHO JUST CHANGED TO THE VERBIAGE, SO IT REMOVES ANY OF THE CHANGE OF ORDER LIMITATIONS.

>> ALL OPPOSED.

THAT'S WHAT WE JUST VOTED ON, IS TO REMOVE THAT AND REPLACE IT WITH THIS.

>> THAT WOULD BE MY UNDERSTANDING.

THERE ARE SOME LIMITATIONS WITHIN THAT STATEMENT, AND IT IS GOING TO BE CHANGING SIGNIFICANT AMOUNTS WHO HAVE BEEN GETTING WITHIN A CERTAIN AMOUNT OF A CONTINGENCY BUDGET.

IT DOES HAVE A LIMIT ON THE CHANGE ORDER MATTERS.

I THINK THAT ANYTHING ELSE THAT WE NEED TO DISCUSS WITH THE REVISIONS TO SECTION SEVEN OR TO SECTION SEVEN OF THE 11 FACILITIES.

MARK, GET THOSE IN JUSTIN'S NAME, WE'LL GET THAT BACK AT THE NEXT MEETING, AND HOPEFULLY IMPROVE THE CHANGES TO SECTION SEVEN.

THEN AGAIN WE WILL BRING OUT THE WHOLE LAWSUIT TO DISCUSS SOME OF THE OTHER THINGS IN THE JANUARY STUDY SESSION.

LET ME STAY TENTATIVE AND JUST BECAUSE WE DON'T HAVE A JANUARY SEVENTH SESSION SCHEDULED, SO IN CASE SOMETHING CHANGES, BUT THAT'S OUR PLAN AT THIS POINT.

THAT BRINGS US TO THE ITEM 4.03 OF THE MATTERS RESERVED FOR THE REPORT ACTION.

THAT IS JUST A DISCUSSION ABOUT GENERAL ASSEMBLY, AND OUR PLANS FOR THAT PROCESS.

GENERAL ASSEMBLY FOR THOSE JUST TO REFRESH YOUR MEMORY FOR THE BOARD AND ALSO FOR THOSE WHO MAY BE WATCHING IN THE AUDIENCE.

GENERAL ASSEMBLY IS WHEN THE DIRECTORS COME TOGETHER, IT HAS BEEN DONE IN PERSON, THIS YEAR THEY'RE DOING IT VIRTUALLY AND ARE CONTINUING TO DO IT VIRTUALLY.

SO ALL THE BOARD MEMBERS CAN ATTEND.

ONLY ONE BOARD MEMBER IS ALLOWED TO BE THE VOTING MEMBER FOR THE GROUP.

SO THAT'S ONE OF THE THINGS WE NEED TO DECIDE ON TONIGHT.

IT DOESN'T HAVE TO BE THE SAME PERSON THE WHOLE MEETING, THEY CAN CHANGE BACK AND FORTH.

BASED ON MY UNDERSTANDING OF THE READING AND PREPARATION.

BUT THAT'S HAPPENING THIS WEEKEND ON SATURDAY AND SUNDAY.

EXCUSE ME, FRIDAY AND SATURDAY.

IT IS BASICALLY WHEN THE WASON GROUP GOES OVER ALL OF THE POLICIES THAT THEY HAVE, ADDS POLICIES IF POLICIES NEED TO BE ADDED, AMENDS POLICIES.

BASICALLY, WHAT'S FOR THEIR STANCE IS SO THAT THE LOBBYING GROUPS KNOW WHAT WASON HAS A WHOLE STANCE FOR.

ONCE THOSE POLICIES HAVE BEEN SET FORTH, THEN THE GROUP OR THE BOSS AS A WHOLE WILL TAKE AND PRIORITIZE THOSE GETTING ESSENTIALLY THE TOP,

[01:35:02]

AND THE TOP THREE, THAT WILL BE THE BIG PUSHES OF WHAT THEY FEEL IS MOST IMPORTANT FOR LEGISLATIVE DIRECTION MOVING FORWARD INTO THE COMING YEAR IN THE 2023 LEGISLATIVE SESSION.

QUESTIONS IN REGARDS TO THAT PROCESS FOR THOSE THAT HAVEN'T BEEN FORTHRIGHT OR THOUGHTS ON HOW WE BEST, WHO IS, IF ANYONE IS LOOKING FORWARD TO PARTICIPATING IN THE MATTERS OF HOW YOU WANT TO GO ABOUT DOING THAT.

>> I THINK I SHOULD FESS UP RIGHT NOW THAT AS A LEGISLATIVE REPRESENTATIVE, I'M GOING TO BE OUT OF TOWN THIS WEEKEND AND I WILL NOT BE ABLE TO ATTEND THIS.

I DO APOLOGIZE.

>> STEVE'S CHECKED OUT AS WELL.

>> SINCE THE ACTIONS ARE GOING TO BEING THROUGH POLICIES AND THE PROPOSED, I'LL VOLUNTEER.

>> WAY TO FOLLOW THAT SORT OF THING.

>> THAT BEING SET, IN REPRESENTING THE BOARD ON THESE POSITIONS, I DON'T REALLY KNOW HOW THE ENTIRE BOARD FEELS ABOUT THE VARIOUS AND SALARIED POSITIONS THAT ARE THERE.

I KNOW THAT I'LL BE REPRESENTING THE DISTRICT, THE BOARD, NOT MYSELF.

ARE THERE ANY PARTICULAR ONES THAT IF WE COULD BRING IN ENOUGH, COULD YOU DO THIS, HAVE A DISCUSSION ABOUT BEFORE THE WEEKEND?

>> I'M NOT SURE IF ANYONE HAS WENT THROUGH THE FINAL HANDBOOK FOR THAT.

I KNOW, HISTORICALLY, I HAVE NOT HAD A CHANCE BECAUSE I WAS OUT OF TOWN ON A WORK MEETING LAST WEEK SO I'M CATCHING UP MYSELF.

BUT WHOEVER IS DOING IT, AND I WENT TO THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY BEFORE AND I'VE HELPED WITH OTHERS.

IT IS DEFINITELY HELPFUL IF PEOPLE CAN HAVE A CHANCE TO READ THROUGH THOSE AND GIVE SOME INPUT TO THE PERSON WHO'S ATTENDING.

JUST SO I DON'T FORGET TO MENTION, I DO HAVE THE EMAIL AND IT HAS OUR PASSWORD FOR VOTING MEMBERS SO YOU NOW NEED TO BE IN CONTACT WITH THAT.

BUT IF YOU GET A CHANCE YOU CAN GO THROUGH THAT.

IT IS A LENGTHY DOCUMENT, I DON'T KNOW HOW MANY PAGES THERE ARE THIS YEAR.

LAST YEAR WHEN I WENT THROUGH IT WAS 194 OR SOMETHING.

IT'S LIKE READING, NOT REALLY.

BUT IT IS IMPORTANT BECAUSE IT DOES PUT FORTH ALL THE POSITIONS.

THERE ARE, ESSENTIALLY, STANDING POSITIONS WHICH ARE ONES THAT HAVE BEEN BROUGHT UP AND HAVE BEEN APPROVED BY LAWS TO THREE YEARS IN A ROW.

ONCE THEY'VE BEEN APPROVED FOR THREE YEARS IN A ROW, THEY BECOME A STANDING POSITION AND THIS IS ALWAYS PART OF THAT THEY ARE REVIEWED ON A REGULAR BASIS.

THERE'RE OTHER ONES THAT ARE BROUGHT UP THAT ARE REPEATS THAT HAVE COME UP FROM YEARS PAST.

THEN FINALLY THERE ARE NEW PROPOSALS.

IT'S QUITE A PROCESS TO WATCH.

I WOULD SAY IT'S PROBABLY MUCH BETTER IN-PERSON THAN VIRTUALLY JUST BECAUSE YOU SEE ALL THE INNER WORKINGS, AND PARTICULARLY IF THEY CALL A WEIGHTED VOTE WHERE EACH DISTRICT GETS A WEIGHTED AMOUNT BASED ON THE SIZE OF THEIR HISTORY OF THEIR ENROLLING.

THEN I THINK A LOT OF IT IS GOING THROUGH [INAUDIBLE].

MY SUSPICION HAVING DONE IT BEFORE IS YOU'LL HAVE A FEELING WHAT THE DISTRICT, WHICH WAY THEY WILL GO.

SOME OF THEM ARE REALLY STRAIGHTFORWARD.

IT'S LIKE, FOR LACK OF A BETTER WAY OF SAYING IT, NO-BRAINERS BECAUSE OF THE THINGS THAT JUST SUPPORT STUDENT EDUCATION.

THEN OTHERS CAN GET A LITTLE MORE [NOISE] WHICH THERE'S OPINIONS INVOLVED.

>> IS EVERYTHING, I JUST SAID PRIVATE UP THE MIDDLE OF THE ROAD, IS IT OKAY?

>> THAT WOULD BE MY ADVICE.

THANK YOU, AND AGAIN, WE'LL KEEP CONTACT AS FAR AS DOING THAT.

IF I UNDERSTAND CORRECTLY, AND I'M A LITTLE SKETCHY ON THIS SO, MELINDA, IF YOU KNOW MORE, OR ANYBODY IF YOU KNOW MORE.

BUT IT SOUNDS LIKE, HISTORICALLY, WHAT HAS BEEN DONE AT THE END OF THIS SESSION IS THEY WOULD GET IT FORTH, THESE ARE ALL POLICIES THAT HAVE CHANGED OR HAVE BEEN APPROVED.

THEN YOU SELECT YOUR TOP 10 OR 15 AND EVERY DISTRICT SELECTS A TOP 10 AND 15, THEY COMPILE THAT TO FIND OUT "WATSON" IS TOP 10 OR 15.

[01:40:01]

BUT I THINK THEY'RE ALLOWING SOME TIME TO PRIORITIZE THOSE SO THE BOARDS CAN GET TOGETHER AND DO THAT.

WE MAY WANT TO TRY TO SCHEDULE A TIME SO WE CAN LOOK AT THOSE AND GO, WHY ARE THESE DO WE THINK ARE THE TOP ONES.

>> THAT'S HOW I UNDERSTOOD IT.

BUT, AGAIN, I READ THAT AND UNDERSTOOD THAT WEEKS AGO.

BUT I THINK THAT'S THE OCTOBER 4TH THROUGH 12TH PERIOD OR WHATEVER.

THEY HAVE A HANDLER THAT'S 192 PAGES TO LOOK THROUGH.

>> SOME OF IT'S EASIER TO READ THAN SOME. QUESTION? [OVERLAPPING]

>> I JUST HAVE A COMMENT. AS THE LAW SAYS, WATSON CONFERENCE IS OPEN TO ANY SCHOOL BOARD MEMBERS, RIGHT?

>> THE WATSON CONFERENCE, YES.

>> THAT INCLUDES STUDENTS.

>> THE WATSON CONFERENCE, SO JUST TO CLARIFY, WE'RE TALKING ABOUT GENERAL ASSEMBLY, WHICH IS DIFFERENT THAN WATSON. [OVERLAPPING] THEN, YEAH.

>> LOOKING AT THE CONFERENCE, I JUST WANT THE TO STUDENTS TO GO.

>> THE STUDENTS CAN ALSO ATTEND TO GENERAL ASSEMBLY BUT THEY'RE NOT VOTING.

THEY CAN'T BE A VOTING MEMBER THERE.

>> BUT I DON'T THINK THEY KNEW ABOUT THE CONFERENCE BEING OPEN TO THEM.

>> FOR LAST YEAR?

>> YEAH. WELL, IS THERE A CONFERENCE?

>> THERE IS THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY WHICH IS SEPTEMBER 30TH, OCTOBER 1ST, SO FRIDAY, SATURDAY.

THAT IS WHERE THEY GO OVER ALL THE PROPOSALS AND LEGISLATION AND POLICIES AND WHAT LAWS ARE SUPPOSED TO GET ENACTED INTO LAW, ESSENTIALLY.

THEN THE CONFERENCE IS WHEN WE COME TOGETHER [NOISE] AND HAVE THE, ESSENTIALLY, CONTINUING EDUCATION AND STUFF.

BUT THAT'S JUST BEFORE THANKSGIVING.

>> YEAH. IT'S IN NOVEMBER.

I JUST WANTED TO LET THE STUDENTS KNOW THEY'RE WELCOME TO ATTEND.

IF THEY SO DESIRE, THEY NEED TO LET THE BOARD KNOW.

[NOISE]

>> I THINK, LIKE YOU SAID, PRETTY MUCH A REGISTRATION FOR GENERAL ASSEMBLY IS OPEN TO EVERYONE THIS YEAR TOO.

USED TO BE THAT YOU HAD ONE DELEGATE THAT WENT IN.

LIKE I SAID, IT WAS PRETTY IMPRESSIVE IN PERSON AND PARTICULARLY WITH THOSE WEIGHTED VOTES WHEN THEY CLOSE THE DOORS AND IF YOU WENT TO THE BATHROOM AT THE WRONG TIME, YOU WERE NOT LET BACK IN.

IT WAS PRETTY INTENSE.

ANY OTHER QUESTIONS ABOUT GENERAL ASSEMBLY?

[5. FOCUS ON DISTRICT OPERATIONS]

THEN WE'LL MOVE ON TO ITEM 5.01, WHICH IS A REPORT ON THE CAPITAL PROJECTS BONDS.

FOR THAT, I'LL TURN IT OVER TO MARK.

>> TODAY, WE SPENT A GREAT PORTION OF THE DAY RECONCILING THE BUDGET PROJECT.

WE'RE DONE WITH THAT.

JUST AS A POINT OF INTEREST, ON MONDAY, THERE WERE 73 WORKERS ON THE PROJECT REPRESENTED AND 184 PERSON-HOURS.

ACTUALLY THERE IN ALL KINDS OF DIFFERENT TRADES WORKING ON THE BUILDING.

THE GYM FLOOR IS GOING TO BE REFINISHED OVER THE WEEK OF THANKSGIVING.

THERE'LL BE A COUPLE OF DAYS WHERE THE STUDENTS WON'T HAVE ACCESS TO THE GYM, FIRST PART OF THE WEEK AND THEY'LL BE REFINISHING THE FLOOR.

WE HAD SOME TOUCH-UP WORK THAT NEEDED TO BE DONE AND THEY NEED A PERIOD OF TIME TO GO AND GET IN THERE AND LET IT CURE IN.

THAT SEEMED LIKE THE BEST TIME TO DO IT BEFORE OUR FIRST PROCESS.

BOND OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE MET LAST WEEK.

DR. DOMINGUEZ WAS IN ATTENDANCE, AND DR. CHARLES AS ALWAYS.

I DON'T KNOW IF YOU WANT TO SAY ANYTHING ABOUT MEETING, STEVE.

I DIDN'T PREP YOU FOR THAT.

>> YOU PUT ME ON SPOT, DIDN'T YOU?

>> YOU DON'T HAVE TO. [LAUGHTER]

>> NO, YOU GOT IT, MARK.

I THINK I'VE SAID ENOUGH. [LAUGHTER]

>> I'M SURE I HAVE, BUT I'LL PICK IT ON.

[LAUGHTER] THE ART COMMITTEE IS WORKING IN THE BACKGROUND.

THE CURATOR IS OUT CURATING, CHARTERING UP SOME POTENTIAL ARTWORKS AND THEY ARE WORKING ON SCHEDULING A FOLLOW-UP MEETING IN OCTOBER SOME TIME TO ACTUALLY GET A FIRST LOOK AT SOME OF THE PROPOSED ARTWORK FOR THE NEW CAMPUS, WHICH IS PART OF THE STATE ART COMMISSION FUNDING, THAT MONEY FROM THE STATE TO BUY ARTWORK FOR THE CAMPUS.

WE'RE ALL PRETTY EXCITED ABOUT THAT.

I THINK THAT THE BIG NEWS THAT WE SHARED EARLIER THAT IT'S PROBABLY WORTH REPEATING, WE ARE CURRENTLY ON BUDGET AND ON SCHEDULE TO BUILD THE WORK OF ART AS PROMISED.

[01:45:03]

WE'RE OPTIMISTIC WE'RE GOING TO GET THAT DONE.

>> ANYTHING ELSE OR ANY QUESTIONS FOR MARK? DEFINITELY I'LL LIKE TO CARRY ON TIME AND ON BUDGET, THOSE ARE THE KIND OF WORDS. COULD BE OUR MANTRA.

THEN THAT TAKES US ON,

[6. FOCUS ON STUDENTS]

AS WE RECALL, WE CAN MOVE TO 6.01, THE REVIEW OF MONITORING REPORT FOR RESULTS POLICY 2.2 UP INTO THAT REVIEW PROCESS AND THEN THAT WOULD COME OUT NEXT MONTH.

>> YEAH, HERE'S THE CALENDAR.

>> THERE'S THE CALENDAR, WHERE YOU CAN SEE IT.

AGAIN, OE-6 ON FINANCE WAS FORE-SCHEDULED TO BE PUT FORTH TO THIS MEETING FOR REVIEW, BUT WE'VE DELAYED IT JUST SO WE CAN START WITH TWO POLICIES AS OPPOSED TO THREE ON OUR FIRST GO AROUND WITH THIS.

THAT HOPEFULLY, THEN, WILL GET US BACK ON TRACK WITH OUR SCHEDULE AS LISTED IN THE GC POLICY.

THEN THAT TAKES US ON TO ITEM 7,

[7. SHARING [GC-7.E.]]

WHICH I'LL START WITH 7.01, WHICH IS STUDENTS SHARING.

WE TURN IT OVER TO JASMINE.

>> OKAY. I GOT A BUNCH OF HOMECOMING STUFF THAT I WROTE DOWN.

HOMECOMING IS GOING TO BE ON OCTOBER 8TH, 7:00 TO 11:00 PM.

WE ALSO HAVE DRESS-UP DAYS THROUGHOUT THE WHOLE WEEK.

FROM THE 3RD TO THE 8TH, WE'RE GOING TO HAVE DECADES SINCE THE FIRST IS MONDAY.

EACH CLASS WILL HAVE TO PICK A CERTAIN DECADE TO DRESS UP AS.

THE FRESHMEN ARE THE 2000S AND SOPHOMORES ARE THE '90S, JUNIORS ARE THE '80S AND SENIORS ARE THE '70S.

THEN FOR TUESDAY IT'S CONSTRUCTION OR NEON DAY.

WE'LL DRESS UP IN CONSTRUCTION OR NEONY CLOTHING.

FOR WEDNESDAY IT'S UGLY COLOR DAY, I.E.

GREEN BECAUSE, [LAUGHTER] YES.

[LAUGHTER] YES.

>> I'LL WORK WITH CHRIS AND WE'LL SEE IF WE CAN GET SOME DATA [INAUDIBLE]

[01:56:01]

AND HOPEFULLY WE CAN MAKE IT WORK. KRISTI.

[01:56:07]

>> YOU ALL NOTICE, WE HAVE TWO NEW SCREENS AND SO I DO WANT TO GIVE A SHOUT OUT TO OUR IT TEAM.

WE HAVE JOHN IN HERE TONIGHT, AND LAST WEEK WAS IT PROFESSIONALS WEEK [NOISE] AND I THINK OUR GAME CHANGERS FOR US.

THESE TWO SCREENS REPRESENT, WHAT WE'LL BE GOING INTO THE HIGH SCHOOL AND SOME ARE TRYING THEM OUT.

I'M SCREEN-SHARING WITH THIS ONE AND I'M [INAUDIBLE] THIS ONE, BUT THEY ARE TOUCHSCREENS, COULD BE MANUAL AND GOING UP [INAUDIBLE] I JUST WANT TO GIVE YOU AN UPDATE WHERE I'M AT WITH MY ENTRY PLAN THIS LAST WEEK.

I GOT TO SPEND THE DAY AT EACH ELEMENTARY, I RODE THE BUS OVER.

WE HAVE ABOUT 14 STUDENTS WHO RIDE THE FERRY OVER IN THE MORNINGS SO THAT WAS A JOY, IF YOU EVER WANT TO BREAK YOUR DAY, START IT OFF ON A FERRY WITH SOME OF OUR ELEMENTARY SCHOOL STUDENTS.

THERE, WE GOT PICKED UP BY STEWART, WHO IS THE BUS DRIVER AND A DAD AND RE-INVENTING THE GARDEN.

THEY'RE TAKING THE LEAD.

THAT WAS FUN. ANYTIME I GET A SWING OF THE DAY, I'VE BEEN HAVING A GOOD DAY. THAT WAS A LOT OF FUN.

IT WAS INTERESTING TO SPEND THE DAY THERE AND JUST WHAT AN AMAZING SCHOOL COMMUNITY, THE CHILDREN JUST REALLY FUNCTIONED A LOT LIKE A FAMILY.

I LEARNED A LOT ABOUT, WHAT HAPPENS WHEN THE FERRIES ARE NOT RUNNING.

WHAT HAPPENS IF THE FERRY CLOSES AND ALL OUR STUDENTS ARE ON THE OTHER SIDE.

THEY ALL HAVE AN EMERGENCY CONTACT ON THE ISLAND.

THE ISLAND IS REALLY TAKING CARE OF THE CHILDREN AS THEIR OWN AND THEN JUST A COMPLEXITY, SO WE HAVE TWO ROOM SCHOOLHOUSE BASICALLY.

TO OUR K-1, 2 TEACHER, I TAUGHT KINDERGARTEN AND SO THEY HAVE TO HAVE FIRST CLASS AND SECOND GRADERS IN THE SAME ROOM AT THE SAME TIME.

THEY'RE MAKING MAGIC HAPPEN AND THEN THEY HAVE 3, 4, 5 TOGETHER.

THEY JUST ALL WEAR MANY HATS AND GET THE JOB DONE.

IF YOU EVER WANT TO VISIT EACH, I'D LOVE TO HAVE YOU.

SOME UPCOMING VISITS ACTUALLY TOMORROW MORNING I WILL START MY NEXT TWO DAYS AT FERNDALE HIGH SCHOOL.

IN TWO FULL DAYS I'M NOT GOING TO BE ABLE TO VISIT EVERY TEACHER'S CLASSROOM.

I'LL BE GOING BACK ON NOVEMBER 2ND, OCTOBER 6TH AND 7TH.

THE 6TH I'LL BE AT CASCADIA ALL DAY AND THE 7TH I'LL BE AT SKYLINE AND THEN ON THE 10TH I'LL BE AT NORTH BELLINGHAM AND [INAUDIBLE] LEARNING CENTER AND CT. MY GOAL IS, I WILL VISIT EVERY SINGLE CLASSROOM IN OUR SCHOOL DISTRICT BETWEEN NOW AND DECEMBER.

MEETING WITH EACH STAFF AND SO I'M VERY EXCITED.

IT'S NOT GOING TO BE A LOT OF TIME.

TOMORROW IT'LL BE 10 MINUTES HERE, 10 MINUTES THERE.

I'LL BE LOOKING FOR JAZZY AND OFF AND ON.

BUT I'M EXCITED JUST TO GET A FEEL FOR OUR SYSTEM AND THEN I'M GOING TO BE MEETING WITH STUDENTS AND ASKING THEM SOME QUESTIONS ABOUT WHAT DOES BELONGING MEAN TO THEM? WHAT DO WE DO THAT HELPS THEM TO FEEL BELONGING? WHAT ARE SOME THINGS WE CAN BE DOING BETTER? HOW DO THEY LIKE TO LEARN AND ARE WE MEETING THEIR EXPECTATIONS FOR WHAT THEY'RE HOPING TO GET OUT OF OUR SCHOOL SYSTEMS. I'LL BE SHARING THAT DATA WITH YOU.

SOME HIGH FIVE FRIDAY.

OUR HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS, CELINE AND I GOT INVITED, SO I GOT TO SPEND FRIDAY MORNING GIVING HIGH FIVES TO STUDENTS AND STAFF AS THEY WALKED IN AND THAT WAS A LOT OF FUN.

THEN WE ATTENDED THE HIGH SCHOOL PARENT NIGHT, IT WAS AMAZING.

THE TEAM THERE AT KERRY RESOURCES, DIFFERENT AT BEYOND COLLEGE OPPORTUNITIES, SOCIAL SERVICES.

OUR HR TEAM WAS THERE, JUST LETTING PEOPLE KNOW THAT WE HAVE JOBS THAT FAMILIES COULD APPLY FOR IF THEY WERE INTERESTED.

FOOD SERVICE WAS THERE EXPLAINING THAT. IT WAS AMAZING.

[02:00:05]

OUR CULINARY ARTS PROGRAM, IF YOU EVER GET A CHANCE TO EAT OUR COOKIES I HIGHLY RECOMMEND IT.

THEN WE'VE BEEN WORKING WITH THE HIGH SCHOOL STAFF AND WE HAVE ABOUT SOLIDIFIED OUR SUPERINTENDENT STUDENT ADVISORY.

WE HAVE TWO REPRESENTATIVES, OUR STUDENT REPRESENTATIVES WILL SIT ON THAT ADVISORY AND I'LL COME BACK AND SHARE WITH YOU WHAT WE'RE WONDERING ABOUT THAT.

I'LL BE MEETING WITH THAT TEAM EACH MONTH, SO I'M EXCITED FOR THAT TO START.

I'M GOING TO BE SPEAKING AT CITY COUNCIL THIS COMING WEEK.

THEN DR. TAMMY CAMPBELL CAME LAST WEEK.

SHE'LL BE COMING BACK ON THE 5TH WHERE I'LL BE SHARING THE VOICES OF OUR STUDENTS.

BUT WE BEGUN ENVISIONING, WHERE WE BEGAN TO IDENTIFY HOW DO WE DEFINE THAT IN THE SCHOOL SYSTEM? WHAT ARE THOSE METAPHORS, WHEN WE'RE TALKING ABOUT HIGH-QUALITY EDUCATION.

THEN ON OCTOBER 18TH, RIGHT HERE IN THIS BUILDING, WE WILL BE HAVING OUR FAMILY RESOURCE OPEN HOUSE, AT THE SAME TIME WE'LL BE RUNNING A JOB FAIR SO PEOPLE IN THE COMMUNITY WHO ARE INTERESTED IN LEARNING MORE ABOUT THE FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER AND ALSO THE JOBS WE HAVE AVAILABLE.

WE'RE GOING TO HAVE THIS BUILDING OPEN AND READY TO GO.

THEN I DID GET TO ATTEND THE [INAUDIBLE] OR SITE COMMITTEE AND IT WAS GREAT FOR LOTS OF REASONS.

I GOT TO SIT ON THE SIDE AND JUST WATCH IT.

IT WASN'T PARTICIPATING IN.

IT WAS JUST AMAZING.

THERE ARE THIS GROUP OF VOLUNTEERS, THEY'RE TAKING THIS VERY SERIOUSLY.

IF WE DIDN'T FEEL GREAT ABOUT WHAT'S HAPPENING WITH OUR BOND BEFORE.

YOU WATCH ONE OF THOSE MEETINGS, LOOK AT THE WEBSITE, IT'S AMAZING HOW CAREFUL AND FINE TUNE AND THE QUESTIONS THEY WERE ASKING.

I LEARNED A TON AND LIKE YOU, I DIDN'T KNOW HALF THE VOCABULARY, SO I WAS BACK THERE GOOGLING LOTS OF WORDS.

IT WAS AMAZING. THAT'S THE END OF MY UPDATE.

>> ANYTHING FROM THE ADMIN TEAM? THEY'RE REALLY SHORT AND SWEET.

[LAUGHTER] COOL.

[NOISE] THAT BRINGS US ONTO OUR CONSENT AGENDAS,

[8. SUPERINTENDENT CONSENT AGENDA [GC-2.4]]

[9. BOARD CONSENT AGENDA [GC-2.4]]

BOTH THE SUPERINTENDENT AND OR CONSENT AGENDAS.

AGAIN, THESE ARE A GROUP OF ITEMS THAT HAVE BEEN PUT FORTH TO THE BOARD THAT THE BOARD HAS HAD TIME TO LOOK AT AND CAN APPROVE AS ONE GROUP OR CAN APPROVE SEPARATELY.

I KNOW WE MENTIONED AT THE BEGINNING OF THE MEETING SOME INTERESTS IN DISCUSSING A COUPLE OF THE ITEMS. AT THIS POINT, I'LL PUT FORTH THE SUPERINTENDENTS CONSENT AGENDA.

IF THERE'S DISCUSSION OR QUESTIONS ABOUT ANY ITEMS, YOU CAN BRING IT UP FOR DISCUSSION.

>> I WOULD LIKE TO LOOK AT [INAUDIBLE] THERE'S A REQUEST FOR FUNDING FOR A FIELD TRIP [OVERLAPPING] YES, I PRINTED OUT.

I DON'T KNOW. YOU CAN SEE EVERYTHING.

MY CONCERN IS THIS, CONSIDER ALL THESE STUDENTS AT [INAUDIBLE] THE FACILITY THAT THEY'RE GOING TO SAYS THAT IT HOUSES 92.

HOW DO THEY DO THAT WITH CHAPERONES AND WHATNOT? BECAUSE I'M SURE IT WILL REQUIRE SOME.

THIS WAS THE QUESTION I FOUND IS NOT ADDRESSED IN THEIR REQUEST.

>> I'M GOING TO LET COUNTY ANSWER THIS ONE.

>> HI. BECKY, I'D HAVE TO GO BACK AND DOUBLE-CHECK BUT WHAT I WOULD SAY IS THAT EAGLE RIDGE HAS TENDED AT MOUNTAIN SCHOOL FOR MULTIPLE YEARS AND WE'VE NEVER HAD A PROBLEM OR QUESTION REGARDING THE CAPACITY OF ANY OF THE CABINS OR THE ABILITY TO HOST US AS A DISTRICT.

JUST AS FYI, THIS IS THE FIRST REQUEST COMING IN BECAUSE LEGAL RAGE DOESN'T TEND MOUNTAIN SCHOOL, BUT ALL OF OUR 313 STUDENTS HERE AT FERNDALE DO ATTEND OUTDOOR EDUCATION PROGRAM.

THEY JUST GO IN THE FALL AND GO TO MOUNTAIN SCHOOL THAT OTHER SCHOOLS ALL THE [INAUDIBLE] IN SPRING.

THAT WILL ALSO BE COMING IN.

THERE'S NOT A CAPACITY ISSUE IN ANY OF THE CAMPS WHICH OUR STUDENTS ATTEND.

JUST TO CLARIFY ALSO, THE BOARD IS OR DISTRICT, WE ACTUALLY RECEIVED A GRANT THAT WAS BASED ON LEGISLATIVE FUNDING AND HOUSE BILL 2078, WHICH IS OUR OUTDOOR LEARNING GRANTS PROGRAM.

OUR DISTRICT RECEIVED A GRANT TO FULLY FUND OUTDOOR EDUCATION PROGRAMS THIS YEAR FOR OUR STUDENTS.

OUR DISTRICT WILL NOT HAVE TO PAY FOR OUR STUDENTS TO ATTEND,

[02:05:01]

OUR ONLY OBLIGATION WILL BE THE TRANSPORTATION PORTION OF IT.

[INAUDIBLE] REGISTER AS PART OF OUR POLICY WORK IN THAT BECAUSE IT IS ALREADY TRAVEL [INAUDIBLE]

>> THAT WAS JUST ONE QUESTION, WAS LODGING SEEMED QUESTIONABLE GIVEN THEY ARE NOT SO MANY.

YES, THIS HAS BEEN DONE IN THE PAST SUCCESSFULLY.

>> AS A PARENT I HAVE BEEN TO MOUNTAIN SCHOOL AND I BET WE HAVE [OVERLAPPING]

>> IT'S HUGE THERE.

I REMEMBER GOING THERE IN [INAUDIBLE] I THINK THERE'S MORE THAN ENOUGH SPACE.

>> WE DEFINITELY APPRECIATE CHAPERONES TOO. [LAUGHTER]

>> IT DOESN'T SAY HERE HOW MANY CHAPERONES THERE ARE.

IT'S LIKE, OKAY, 92 OF YOU, SO YOU GET [LAUGHTER]

>>TWO CHAPERONES IN [INAUDIBLE] [LAUGHTER] [OVERLAPPING]

>> WE'LL GET SOME VOLUNTEERS [LAUGHTER]

>> I'M GOING TO GO WITH THAT.

>> I SHARED ROOM FOR ONE OF MY KIDS.

I THINK MY YOUNGER ONE HE WAS IN FIFTH GRADE, WENT TO CAMP KATALOKA, SO MUCH FUN.

OF COURSE, I WAS IN IT WITH GIRLS, SO I DON'T HAVE GIRLS, SO IT WAS LIKE A TOTALLY DIFFERENT EXPERIENCE.

>> I HAVE THE EXPERIENCE CHAPERONING, LEARNED ABOUT BOYS AND LACK OF HYGIENE.

[LAUGHTER].

>> YOU ALREADY HAVE BOYS. YOU SHOULD KNOW ALL ABOUT THAT.

>> BUT THEIR MOTHER WAS THERE TO STRAIGHT TALK US [LAUGHTER].

>> IT'S CAMP.

[LAUGHTER].

>> THIS WASN'T A CAMP. THIS WAS DISNEYLAND.

>> JUST A QUESTION, WHEN THEY HAVE THINGS LIKE THESE, WE MUST HAVE SOME POLICIES SOMEWHERE ON HOW MANY CHAPERONES YOU NEED TO TAKE IT AND HOW THEY ORGANIZE THINGS SO THAT PEOPLE DON'T RUN OFF, GET INTO TROUBLE.

>> [OVERLAPPING] WE CAN GET THAT INFORMATION FOR YOU.

ACTUALLY, THE ORGANIZATION OF OUR SCHOOL HAS THAT MANDATE OF HOW MANY ADULTS ATTEND WITH, SO WE CAN GET THAT.

>>HERE'S THE OTHER THING I TRIED TO GET INTO THOSE THINGS ON THEIR WEBSITE AND IT WAS FOR.

>> [OVERLAPPING] WE CAN GET THAT INFORMATION.

WE'LL DO A FOLLOW-UP IN THIS WAY THIS WEEK.

>> THEY USUALLY SEND US AN AGREEMENT AS WE PREPARE FOR IT.

IF THAT DOES HAPPEN ALL OF THOSE EXPECTATIONS.

>> OTHER QUESTIONS ABOUT THE TRAVEL OR ANYTHING ELSE ON THE CONSENT AGENDA?

>> BEFORE WE GO, I KNOW I HAVE TO SAY THIS, BECAUSE THEY SAY AT HOME YOU DON'T TAKE THEM HOME WITH YOU, WHEN YOU HAVE SOMETHING TO SAY, YOU BETTER SAY IT.

WHETHER IT'S RELEVANT OR NOT, I DON'T KNOW.

>> SAY.

>> I LOVED THE EXECUTIVE TEAM AND I DON'T THINK SHE CAN BE AS GOOD WITHOUT HER TEAM.

SO THERE YOU GO. I'LL PROBABLY SAY IT AGAIN AND AGAIN AND AGAIN. [LAUGHTER] I APPRECIATE.

>> PEGGY, DID YOU HAVE SOME QUESTIONS? I KNOW YOU MENTIONED IN THE NURSE CASE MANAGER.

>> I DID MENTION THAT ONE BECAUSE I TALKED TO CHRISTINA ABOUT A LITTLE BIT MOVE IT OVER HERE AND GET SOME INFORMATION AND I STILL DON'T REALLY FEEL LIKE I'M A PLACE WHERE I'M COMFORTABLE WITH SAYING THIS IS NECESSARILY A BAD THING TO SAY.

IS THIS THREATENING? PARTIALLY BECAUSE IT'S MISSING ATTACHMENT A, SO THERE'S SOME INFORMATION THAT'S NOT HERE.

I DON'T KNOW IF WE COULD APPROVE IT IF IT'S ONLY PARTIAL INFORMATION, IF WE'RE MISSING SOME OF THE INFORMATION.

MORE SO I JUST WANT TO HAVE A BETTER UNDERSTANDING FOR WHAT OUR ACTION WILL BE.

YES, I KNOW WE TALKED ABOUT THAT A LITTLE BIT EARLIER, AND HOW THE PARTS WORK TOGETHER AND WHAT OTHER SERVICES EXIST IF YOU DO THIS.

TO ME, HONESTLY, I REALIZE THAT THE SCHOOL NURSE THAT FEELS MORE A LOT OF WHAT THEY'RE DOING IS SOCIAL SERVICES, WHICH IS NOT AN EDUCATION.

I REALIZED SHE WILL SUPPORT THINGS FOR EDUCATION, BUT AT THE SAME TIME, THIS FEELS LIKE IT'S MOVING IN THE DIRECTION, ADDING ANOTHER PROGRAM THAT I DON'T-

>> YEAH, I WOULDN'T SAY IT'S ADDING A PROGRAM BUT IT'S AN ADDING SERVICE.

IF A TEACHER IS NEEDING HELP, LET'S SAY WE HAVE A STUDENT IN THE CLASSROOM THAT IS DESIGNATED UNDER MIGRANT SERVICES, AND SOMEONE'S GOING TO HAVE TO DO THE HELP, AND SO THIS IS A DEDICATED PERSON AROUND NURSING SUPPORT THAT HELPS THEM CONNECT WITH DIFFERENT AGENCIES.

IF WE DON'T HAVE THIS NURSE PERSON,

[02:10:01]

ONE OF OUR EMPLOYEES IS DOING IT.

BEING ABLE TO HAVE THAT AND I'M GOING TO ACTUALLY BASED ON HERE, SHE'S BEEN TAKING THE LEAD ON THIS.

I DON'T KNOW IF TRINA OR KELLY FEEL LIKE THEY CAN TALK ABOUT THIS PARTICULAR ONE, BUT THEY TALK ABOUT THE NURSING SERVICES AND JUST SOME OF THE COMPLICATIONS OR THE LOAD THAT OUR NURSES ARE CARRYING.

>> SURE. WHAT I WOULD SAY AGAIN TRINA IS GOING TO HAVE A CHAT IN HERE AS WELL, IS OUR NURSES AND THE STUDENTS THAT WE ARE SERVING EVERY DAY HAVE SOME PRETTY COMPLEX MEDICAL NEEDS THAT WE'RE CONTINUING TO WORK HARD AT EVERY SINGLE DAY TO OUR BEST, AND WE ALSO HAVE SUCH AMAZINGLY DIVERSE SET OF STUDENTS AND FAMILIES THAN ANY OPPORTUNITY TO PROVIDE ADDITIONAL SUPPORTS IN WHATEVER WAY POSSIBLE, AND CONNECT OUR FAMILIES AND OUR STUDENTS TO RESOURCES THAT CAN HELP SUPPORT THEM IN ANY WAY, I THINK IS A GREAT VALUE TO US IN THIS DISTRICT.

WE'RE CONTINUING TO WORK REALLY HARD TO MEET THE NEEDS OF ALL OF OUR LEARNERS, ALL OUR FAMILIES, OUR COMMUNITY.

AT THIS POINT, WE HAVE MORE NURSING STAFF THAT YOU EVER HAD, AND WE'RE STILL FINDING OPPORTUNITIES TO IMPROVE IN ALL AREAS IN TERMS OF THE HEALTH NEEDS THAT WE ARE BEING PRESENTED.

BUT HAVING SOMEONE ELSE THAT'S CAPABLE AND KNOWS THOSE RESOURCES AND HAS THE ABILITY TO WORK WITH OUR FAMILIES TO GET ACCESS TO THOSE RESOURCES, WOULD ONLY BENEFIT OUR STUDENTS AND OUR GREATER SCHOOL COMMUNITY AS WELL AS HELP CONNECT THE LIFT THAT OUR NURSES CURRENTLY HAVE.

WE'RE ABLE TO TAKE SOMETHING AND GET THEM SOME ADDITIONAL SUPPORT IN ANY OF THOSE AREAS, I THINK IT'S ONLY A BENEFIT.

>> THIS IS LIKE A PILOT PROGRAM, WHAT IS THE END GOAL OF A PILOT, WHAT ARE THEY LOOKING TO ACCOMPLISH?

>>THEY STILL INVOLVE IN THOSE CONVERSATIONS.

UNLESS SOMEONE ON THE EXECUTIVE TEAM FEELS LIKE THEY CAN ANSWER IT, I CAN'T ANSWER THAT.

I THINK WHAT IT IS, IS WE, THIS IS SOMEONE WHO'S GOING BE BUYING THE WALL.

ONE OF THING THAT PEGGY AND I TALKED ABOUT YESTERDAY IS, OFTEN OUR STUDENTS, IF THEY QUALIFY UNDER MIGRANT, THEY MIGHT, EVEN FOR A DEAL THIS YEAR, AND THEY MIGHT BE [INAUDIBLE] NEXT YEAR, THEY MIGHT BE IN THE SKAGIT COUNTY THE NEXT YEAR.

THIS IS SOMEONE WHO COULD ACTUALLY BE ABLE TO OVERSEE, MANAGE THROUGH THE ESD.

DO YOU HAVE SOMETHING TO ADD [INAUDIBLE]?

>> I WAS GOING TO SAY THAT A PART OF THE FERNDALE REGIONALS, LOOKING AT A CROSSWALK FROM COUNTY, WE'RE LOOKING AT WHERE THOSE SUPPORTS ARE NEEDED, AND THE ESD MANAGING THAT PROJECT.

THE NURSE WOULDN'T WORK FOR US, SHE WILL WORK FOR ESD AND WORK ACROSS COUNTIES DEPENDING ON WHERE ALL THOSE SHOULD BE PLACE.

I SEE IT AS OUTREACH OF NOT JUST NURSING, BUT ALSO [INAUDIBLE] AND THAT ABILITY TO CONNECT FAMILIES WITH THOSE RESOURCES.

>> I'M JUST LOOKING AT NUMBER 8 AS WELL AS I'M DIGGING INTO THIS A LITTLE BIT MORE.

IT SAYS, THE MODEL BEING VALUABLE, IF IT PROVES TO BE VALUABLE AND FINANCIALLY FEASIBLE AT THE END OF EVERY YEAR, IT LOOKS WE WILL REEVALUATE THE PARTNERSHIP AS WELL AS THAT PERCENTAGE OF OUR MIGRANTS STUDENTS THAT ARE PARTICIPATING IN ACCESSING THE PROGRAM.

THEN IT LOOKS THAT WOULD BE THE AMOUNT THAT WOULD THEN BE SPLIT.

IT SOUNDS LIKE ON AN ANNUAL BASIS, WE HAD THE OPPORTUNITY TO REVIEW OUR PARTICIPATION, LOOK AT THE ENGAGEMENT OF [INAUDIBLE] OUR COMMUNITY AND FIGURE OUT IN WHICH WAY WE WILL CONTINUE TO MOVE FORWARD WITH THIS.

I THINK WE'RE LOOKING AT AN HIGHLIGHTED IN TERMS OF SEEING IF IT IS BENEFITING OUR COMMUNITY AND IF IT IS NOT, THEN WE HAVE THE OPPORTUNITY AT THE END OF THE YEAR TO THE REVALUATE PARTNERSHIP OR CONTINUE ON WITH IT BASED ON THE NUMBER OF MIGRANTS PARTICIPATING.

>> I KNOW TOO, YOU HAVE THE FAMILY [INAUDIBLE] PERSON THAT WILL HELP WITH RESOURCES THAT BEING NEW TO THE DISTRICT.

IT'S GOING TO BE BENEFICIAL FOR ALL THE FAMILIES.

>> THAT'S ONE OF THE ROLES OF THIS PARTICULAR NURSE WE TALKED ABOUT BECAUSE THEY ARE NOT ASSIGNED TO A SCHOOL, AND SO MAKING THEM PART OF THAT FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER AND WORKING WITH THOSE LIAISON.

AS NEEDS COME UP, THEY HAVE SOMEONE TO TALK TO.

>> I GUESS FOR ME, I DON'T AGAINST THE NEW PROGRAM.

[02:15:04]

IF WE CONTINUE THIS AND IT BECOMES ONE OF THE ROUTINE THINGS THAT WE SEE ALL THE TIME BECAUSE WE PARTICIPATED AND IT GETS INTO A CYCLE AND IT SEEMS LIKE I JUST SHOW THEM ON A CONSENT AGENDA NOT REALLY.

I JUST WORRY ABOUT, THERE'S ANOTHER ONE, THERE'S ANOTHER ONE, THERE'S ANOTHER ONE.

IT'S SAYING WHERE YOU'VE GOT MULTIPLE PROGRAMS, SOME OF WHICH OVERLAP AND PROVIDE SIMILAR FUNCTIONS.

HOW DO YOU GUYS MANAGE TO GO THROUGH OR DO A REVIEW OF PROGRAMS AND SAY [OVERLAPPING]

>> THAT'S PART OF WHAT WE DO IN THE EXECUTIVE TEAM.

IN FACT TODAY WE BEGAN TALKING AND WE BRING THOSE UP AND WE ASK OURSELVES, IT'S ALSO PART OF THE BUDGET CYCLE.

LET'S SAY WE DIDN'T NEED TO FUND THIS POSITION AT SOME POINT, AND IT'S NOT ABOUT HAVING TO, IT'S WHAT ARE WE NOT GOING TO DO IN ORDER TO AND WHAT'S THE WEIGHT OF THAT?

>> THEN THE FLIP SIDE OF THAT IS, DO YOU HAVE A COLLECTION OF PROGRAMS AND WHATNOT THAT SHOULD WE FIND YOURSELF LOW ON CASH, YOU SAY THIS THING GOES FIRST [INAUDIBLE] DO YOU HAVE THINGS PRIORITIES SO THAT IF YOU WERE [OVERLAPPING].

>> IT'S PRIORITIZED IN CYCLE, THAT'S WHAT WE DO AND MARK IS ALWAYS REMINDING US THAT, WHICH HE'S REALLY GOOD ABOUT ASKING US.

WE WRESTLED WITH HIM, IN FACT TODAY, WE WERE IN A MEETING FOR THREE HOURS WHERE WE SAT AND WHEN YOU WRESTLE WITH THESE IDEAS EVERY SINGLE WEEK, THAT'S OUR RESPONSIBILITY AS A TEAM.

BUT NURSING IS ONE OF THOSE THAT WE CAN'T YES OR NO.

WE'RE GOING TO MAYBE PROVIDE OR NOT PROVIDE, WE HAVE TO PROVIDE.

CURRENTLY WITH OUR CURRENT STAFFING OR NURSES ARE REALLY SPREAD QUITE THIN.

THEN WHEN YOU PUT IN LANGUAGES AND IF A FAMILY NEEDS A DIFFERENT LANGUAGE, WE DON'T ALWAYS HAVE THOSE RESOURCES.

THIS IS SOMETHING THAT WOULD BE ADDED TO, SO THIS IS AN ENHANCEMENT AND A SUPPORT TO OUR TEAM THAT ALREADY EXISTS.

>> SO JUST SOME QUESTIONS TO RELATION FOR THAT LAST.

WHEN WAS THE LAST TIME YOU CUT A PROGRAM? YOU MUST DRIVE FROM THAT IF YOU GO THROUGH REEVALUATE, YOU MUST CUT SOME OUT WITH ONE ASKS JUST DROP.

>> I'LL GET STRAIGHT THAT OVER TO THE EXECUTIVE TEAM WHO HAS BEEN INVOLVED IN THAT.

>> WELL, I CAN MENTION ONE PROGRAM THAT I'M MEETING WITH AN ORGANIZER TOMORROW TO LET THEM KNOW WE WILL BE WITHDRAWING FROM THE PROGRAM.

IT WAS A PROGRAM THAT IS SIGNED AT THE END OF LAST YEAR AND AS WE ARE EVALUATING OUR GOALS AND OUR STRATEGIC PLANS FOR THE YEAR, WE WERE RECOGNIZING THAT THIS PLAN OR THIS PROGRAM ISN'T NECESSARILY IN LINE WITH THOSE.

I'M MEETING WITH THAT ORGANIZATION TOMORROW.

SORRY, I'M NOT SAYING THAT SHE COULDN'T BE LIKE I NEED TO TALK WITH [LAUGHTER].

THERE ARE SOME OTHER PEOPLE INVOLVED IN IT [LAUGHTER].

BUT IT'S JUST A CONSTANT EVOLUTION.

WE ARE REALLY TRYING TO BE VERY STRATEGIC ON WHERE OUR VISION IS FOR THE DISTRICT AND TIME EVERYTHING THAT WE ARE INVOLVING OURSELVES IN OR ALLOCATING RESOURCES TO DIRECTLY TO THOSE PRIORITIES.

AS WE'RE SEEING ITEMS SET AREN'T NECESSARILY FITTING INTO THAT, WE'RE HAVING TO SAY THANK YOU, BUT NO, THANKS.

IT'S HARD SOMETIMES, BUT WE WANT TO BE REALLY INTENTIONAL WITH OUR RESOURCES, OUR TIME, AND PROVIDING THE BEST OPPORTUNITY FOR OUR STUDENTS.

>> THANK YOU, KELLY. I WOULD ADD, THAT'S PART OF WHAT I AM ENGAGING IN RIGHT NOW OPEN THAT TREE PLAN, IS GOING AND LISTENING TO OUR COMMUNITY, LISTENING TO OUR FAMILIES, LISTENING TO OUR STAFF AND STUDENTS, AND THEN WE'RE GOING TO TAKE THAT DATA AND WILL BE PART OF THAT, AND WE'RE GOING TO WRITE THAT VISION AND MISSION AND WHAT ARE THOSE STRATEGIES THAT WE'RE GOING TO REALLY DIVE DEEP INTO.

AFTER WE DO THAT, THEN WE'RE GOING TO COMPARE THAT TO WHAT WE ALREADY HAVE IN PLACE.

HOW DO WE GO DEEP IN ORDER TO INCREASE THE OUTCOMES FOR OUR STUDENTS?

>> A WHOLE LOT OF THINGS [INAUDIBLE] FAILED AND SO THEN EVENT OR ELIMINATE WAS PUT TO THE VOTERS AT A LESSER AMOUNT SO THAT WE COULD BRING IN SOME OF THE MATH.

WE DID BRING SOME OF THEM BACK BUT WE DIDN'T BRING IT ALL OVER THEM.

>> THIS POSITION IS BEING FULLY FUNDED BY [INAUDIBLE] THAT FIRST YEAR?

>> YEAH, AND A DRAFTSMAN.

I GUESS IT'S JUST NICE TO KNOW THAT MAYBE THERE'S A PLAN IN PLACE FOR TRIMMING THAT YOU'VE ALREADY GOTTEN INTO PLACE OR AS YOU KNOW, WE HAVE NEVER SEEN THAT.

>> EOB ABOUT THAT FOR SURE.

AS WE GO THROUGH THE BUDGET CYCLE AND TALKING ABOUT IT.

LIKE KELLY SAID, WE'RE GOING TO LOOK AT THIS AT THE END THIS YEAR, WAS IT WORTH THE TIME? WERE WE GETTING WHAT WE THOUGHT? THEY USE THESE GOING TO BE DOING THE SAME THING.

FOR THIS YEAR IT DOESN'T COST US ANYTHING.

BUT WE WILL BE ABLE TO COLLECT THE DATA.

[02:20:07]

>> OTHER QUESTIONS?

>> AT THIS TIME, THE CHAIR WILL ENTERTAIN EITHER A MOTION TO VOTE ON THE CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS AS A WHOLE OR IF THERE'S A MOTION TO PULL SOMETHING OFF OR AN INDIVIDUAL, WE'LL HAVE THAT TAKEN AS WELL.

>> MOTION TO PULL THAT LAST ONE OFF JUST BECAUSE I STILL WOULD LIKE TO SEE OTHER ATTACHMENTS ON MONDAY.

>> IT HAS BEEN MOVED TO PULL ITEM 8.06 OFF OF THE CONSENT AGENDA AND MOVE IT AENEID INDIVIDUALLY, ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SAY AYE.

ALL THOSE OPPOSED SAY NAY.

>> NAY.

>> IT'S TIME FOR ME TO GO [LAUGHTER]

>> ALL THOSE IN FAVOR OF TAKING ITEM 8.06 TO APPROVE THE AMENDMENT MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING REGARDING MIGRANT NURSE CASE MANAGEMENT OFF THE THE CONSENT AGENDA AND TO VOTE ON IT INDEPENDENTLY SIGNIFY BY SAYING AYE.

>> ALL THOSE THAT OPPOSE TO TAKING IT OFF THE CONSENT AGENDA SIGNIFY BY THE SAYING NAY.

>> NAY.

>> I'M HEARING TWO FOR ONE AGAINST, SO WE WILL TAKE IT OFF AND MOVE SEPARATELY ON IT.

AT THIS POINT THEN WE WILL PUT UP ALL THOSE IN FAVOR OF APPROVING THE MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING FOR MIGRANT NURSE CASE MANAGERS SIGNIFY BY SAYING AYE.

THEN WE'LL GO BACK TO THE FULL CONSENT AGENDA, AND AGAIN, THE CHAIR WILL ENTERTAIN A MOTION TO EITHER VOTE ON INDIVIDUAL ITEM OR TO VOTE ON THE CONSENT AGENDA AS A GROUP OR AS BOTH CONSENT AGENDAS AS A WHOLE.

>> I'LL MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE THE SUPERINTENDENT CONSENT OF AGENDA MINUS 8.06 AND BEFORE CONSENT AGENDA AS WRITTEN.

>> IT HAS BEEN MOVED TO APPROVE SUPERINTENDENT AND BOARD CONSENT AGENDAS LESS ITEM 8.06 AS ATTACHED TO TWO IN BEING PART OF THE MINUTES.

ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SIGNIFY BY SAYING AYE.

>> ALL OPPOSED TO SAY NAY.

CONSENT AGENDAS ARE PASSED.

>> THANK YOU.

[10. MEETING EVALUATION SURVEY]

>>THEN THAT BRINGS US DOWN TO THE LAST ITEM ON OUR AGENDA, WHICH IS THE ACTUAL MEETING EVALUATION SURVEY.

YOU HAVE THOSE IN YOUR PACKETS IN FRONT OF YOU. OPEN ON THIS ONE.

WE'VE BEEN HAVING SOME DISCUSSION ABOUT IT AS FAR AS HOW TO BEST DO IT.

AGAIN, WITH TRAINING THAT BRITT MALONEY DID IN REGARDS TO OUR COHERENT GOVERNANCE AND WATCHING THEIR MODEL, AND AGAIN, I SAID THIS A FEW TIMES THE OTHER NIGHT.

I HAVEN'T SAID MUCH TONIGHT, BUT NOT THE THEORIST IS THE END-ALL BE-ALL, BUT WHAT THEY DO, AND I DON'T WANT TO PUT ANYBODY ON THE SPOT.

BUT THEY HAD ONE MEMBER AT AGE MEDIAN AT THE END OF THE MEETING JUST TO GO DOWN THROUGH THE LIST.

AGAIN, I THROW THAT OUT AS A SUGGESTION.

WE CAN CERTAINLY DISCUSS THE MEETING AND SEE.

I THINK IF WE'RE GOING TO DISCUSS THE MEETING, I DON'T KNOW IF ANYONE WHO'S NECESSARILY COMFORTABLE TAKING THE MIC AND SAY, I CAME TO THIS MEETING ADEQUATELY PREPARED.

LET'S SEE, ON A SCALE OF ONE TO FIVE, FIVE WILL STRONGLY AGREE AND AND ONE WILL STRONGLY DISAGREE.

FEEL FREE TO RATE YOURSELF AT SIX.

BUT ANYWAY, WASN'T SURE.

I WANTED TO GET SOME FEEDBACK FROM THE GROUP, DID WE FEEL IT'S BEST TO DO THAT AS A GROUP THING? DO WE FILL OUT THE SURVEY AND THEN PUT THE RESULTS IN THE NEXT MEETING TO EITHER DISCUSS OR AT LEAST TO REVIEW AS PART OF EXECUTIVE SET CONTENT? WHAT ARE PEOPLE'S THOUGHTS, INTERESTS? THIS IS WHAT WE'VE STRUGGLED WITH HOW TO BEST DEAL WITH IT.

>> WHEN I LOOK AT THE QUESTIONS ON THIS, THE TWO THAT I THINK ARE THE MOST IMPORTANT ARE QUESTION NUMBER 3 AND QUESTION NUMBER 5.

QUESTION 3 IS, WE SPENT THE RIGHT PROPORTION OF THE TIME AT THIS MEETING FOCUSED ON STUDENT LEARNING AND RESULTS.

THEN QUESTION 5, DISCUSSION OF THIS MEETING WAS FOCUSED ON THE BOARD'S VALUES AS EXPRESSED IN POLICY,

[02:25:03]

NOT IN MANAGING OF THE STRATEGIES CHOSEN BY THE SUPERINTENDENT OR HER STAFF TO ACHIEVE THOSE POLICIES.

I THINK IT'S LIKE DO WE REALLY FOCUS ON WHAT WE'RE DOING WHICH IS STUDENT LEARNING? THEN ALSO, ARE WE DOING OUR JOB IN NOT MICRO-MANAGING BUT COMMUNICATING WITH THE SUPERINTENDENT ON IT? THE REST OF THE THINGS AS FAR AS CALLING OUT YOUR SCHOOL BOARD COLLEAGUES OR ADMITTING THAT I'M TIRED TODAY OR SOMETHING LIKE THAT IS LIKE THAT IS NOT AS IMPORTANT.

>> WHAT'S THAT?

>> OH, THAT ME BEING INADEQUATELY PREPARED.

I'M JUST SAYING I'M TIRED TODAY, SORRY.